Does healthcare voucher provision improve utilisation in the continuum of maternal care for poor pregnant women? Experience from Bangladesh

References

• United Nations. Sustainable development goals: 17 goals to transform our world. 2015 [cited 2018 Feb 20]. Available from: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/
   Google Scholar
• NIPORT, ICDDRB, MEASURE Evaluation. Bangladesh maternal mortality and health care survey 2016: priliminary report. Dhaka (Bangladesh): NIPORT, ICDDRB, MEASURE Evaluation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, ICF International. Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2014. Dhaka (Bangladesh): NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, ICF International; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Hong R. Levels and determinants of continuum of care for maternal and newborn health in Cambodia-evidence from a population-based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO, ICM, FIGO. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kerber KJ, Graft-Johnson J, Bhutta Z, et al. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007;370:1358–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukder MN, Rob U, Musa S, et al. Evaluation of the impact of the voucher program for improving maternal health behavior and status in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Population Council; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Demand side financing pilot maternal health voucher scheme proposal. Dhaka: Ministry of Health and Family welfare, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Khan MM. A maternal health voucher scheme: what have we learned from the demand-side financing scheme in Bangladesh? Health Policy Plan. 2011;26:25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Khan MM. Is demand side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar I, Sami M, Akhtar A, et al. Inequity in maternal health care services: evidence from home based skilled-birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86. DOI:10.2471/blt.07.042754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal N, Curtis S, Hasan MS, et al. Trends in equity in use of maternal health services in urban and rural Bangladesh. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter BM, Harrison S, Portela A, et al. The effects of cash transfers and vouchers on the use and quality of maternity care services: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agha S. Impact of a maternal health voucher scheme on institutional delivery among low income women in Pakistan. Reprod Health. 2011;8:10. PubMed PMID: PMC3108911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massavon W, Wilunda C, Nannini M, et al. Effects of demand-side incentives in improving the utilisation of delivery services in Oyam District in northern Uganda: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:431. PubMed PMID: PMC5737523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihara AB, Harries AD, Bissell K, et al. Antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes in a safe motherhood health voucher system in rural Kenya, 2007–2013. Public Health Action. 2015;5:23–29. PubMed PMID: PMC4525362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi J, Thapa B, Osrin D, et al. Economic assessment of a women’s group intervention to improve birth outcomes in rural Nepal. Lancet. 2005;366:1882–1884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manandhar DS, Osrin D, Shrestha BP, et al. Effect of a participatory intervention with women’s groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:970–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Amos MJR, Wong K, Dennis M, et al. Pathways through the continuum of care: a person centred approach to transitions in pre-natal, delivery and post-partum care in Indonesia, Kenya and Nigeria. IUSSP International Population Conference; Cape Town, South Africa. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Adjiwanou V, LeGrand T. Does antenatal care matter in the use of skilled birth attendance in rural Africa: a multi-country analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2013;86:26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar I, Blaakman A, Akhter S. Program evaluation for demand side financing maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh: final report. Reet: HERA; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Woo SE, Jebb AT, Louis T, et al. Putting the ‘person’ in the center: review and synthesis of person-centered approaches and methods in organizational science. Organizational Res Methods. 2018;21:814–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filmer D, Pritchett L. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - or tears. An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2011;38:115–132.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. A joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research. WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka S, Aiga H, Rasmey LC, et al. Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health Policy. 2010;95:255–263. Epub 2010/01/12. PubMed PMID: 20060193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva G, Quinn A, Ngo TD. Vouchers for family planning and sexual and reproductive health services: a review of voucher programs involving Marie Stopes International among 11 Asian and African countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130 Suppl 3:E15–E20. PubMed PMID: 26165906.
   Google Scholar
• Bellows B, Kyobutungi C, Mutua MK, et al. Increase in facility-based deliveries associated with a maternal health voucher programme in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28:134–142. PubMed PMID: 22437506; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3584990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray SF, Hunter BM, Bisht R, et al. Effects of demand-side financing on utilisation, experiences and outcomes of maternity care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:30. PubMed PMID: PMC3897964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker BK, Rahman M, Rahman T, et al. Reasons for preference of home delivery with traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0146161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell R, Spillman I, Newell M-L. The use of facilities for labor and delivery: the views of women in rural Uganda. J Public Health Afr. 2017;8:592. PubMed PMID: 28890773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bernis L, Kinney MV, Stones W, et al. Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet. 2016;387:703–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heazell AE, Siassakos D, Blencowe H, et al. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet. 2016;387:604–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassi ZS, Musavi NB, Maliqi B, et al. Systematic review on human resources for health interventions to improve maternal health outcomes: evidence from low-and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victora CG, Requejo JH, Barros AJD, et al. Countdown to 2015: a decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet. 2016;387:2049–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Luxembourg: WHO; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Definition of skilled health personnel providing care during childbirth: the 2018 joint statement by WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, ICM, ICN, FIGO and IPA. WHO/RHR/18.14. 2018 [cited 2019]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/defining-competent-mnh-professionals
   Google Scholar