Midwifery education, regulation and association in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – current state and challenges

References

• Van Lerberghe W, Matthews Z, Achadi E, et al. Country experience with strengthening of health systems and deployment of midwives in countries with high maternal mortality. Lancet. 2014;384:1215–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFPA, WHO, ICM. The state of the world’s midwifery 2014: a universal pathway. a woman’s right to health. New York (NY): United Nations Population Fund; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Homer CS, Friberg IK, Dias MA, et al. The projected effect of scaling up midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384:1146–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384:1129–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullerton JT, Thompson JB, Johnson P. Competency-based education: the essential basis of pre-service education for the professional midwifery workforce. Midwifery. 2013;29:1129–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Hoope-Bender P, Nove A, Sochas L, et al. The ‘Dream Team’ for sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health: an adjusted service target model to estimate the ideal mix of health care professionals to cover population need. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15:46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York (NY): United Nations; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund East and Southern Africa Regional Office. The state of the world’s midwifery: analysis of the sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health workforce in East & Southern Africa. Johannesburg (South Africa): United Nations Populations Fund; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère du Plan et Suivi de la Mise en œuvre de la Révolution de la Modernité (MPSMRM) MdlSPMaII. Democratic republic of congo demographic and health survey 2013-14: key findings. Rockville (MD): MPSMRM, MSP et ICF International; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund. The State of the World’s Midwifery 2011. Delivering health, saving lives. New York (NY): United Nations Populations Fund; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts J. The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology. 2003;18:395–415.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts J. Professionalism: value and ideology. Current Sociology. 2013;61:778–796.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott A. An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bogren M. Building a midwifery profession in South Asia [Doctoral]. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. Education, regulation and association; 2018. Available from: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/our-work/policy-and-practice/global-standards.html
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton JT, Thompson JB, Severino R. The International Confederation of Midwives essential competencies for basic midwifery practice. an update study: 2009-2010. Midwifery. 2011;27:399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. International definition of the midwife; 2017. Available from: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/definitions-files/2018/06/eng-definition_of_the_midwife-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Polit D, Beck C. Nursing research- generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. Global standards for midwifery education international confederation of midwives; 2013. Available from: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2018/04/icm-standards-guidelines_ammended2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. Global standards for midwifery regulation; 2011. Available from: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2018/04/global-standards-for-midwifery-regulation-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. Member Association Capacity Assessment Tool (MACAT); 2011. Available from: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/association-files/2018/04/macat-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Strengthening quality midwifery education for Universal Health Coverage 2030: framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes SC, Titulaer P, Bokosi M, et al. The involvement of midwives’ associations in policy and planning about the midwifery workforce: A global survey. Midwifery. 2015;31:1096–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandwell R, Bonser D, Hebert E, et al. Stronger together: midwifery twinning between Tanzania and Canada. Global Health. 2018;14:123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. The midwifery educator core competencies. Geneva; 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/13012WHO_Midwifery_educator_core_competencies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hermansson E, Martensson LB. The evolution of midwifery education at the master’s level: a study of Swedish midwifery education programmes after the implementation of the Bologna process. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:866–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler MM, Hutton EK, McNiven PS. Midwifery education in Canada. Midwifery. 2016;33:28–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson K, Osman F, Hatakka M, et al. Evaluation of an online master’s programme in Somaliland. A phenomenographic study on the experience of professional and personal development among midwifery faculty. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;25:96–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards G, Kyakuwaire H, Brownie S. Developing a work/study programme for midwifery education in East Africa. Midwifery. 2018;59:74–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming V, Luyben A. Establishing a masters for Europe–A transnational model for higher education. Midwifery. 2016;33:52–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mivsek P, Baskova M, Wilhelmova R. Midwifery education in Central-Eastern Europe. Midwifery. 2016;33:43–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan R, Lakhani A, Kaufman K, et al. The first competency-based higher education programme for midwives in the South Asian region–Pakistan. Midwifery. 2016;33:37–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson K, Byrskog U, Osman F, et al. Evaluating a model for the capacity building of midwifery educators in Bangladesh through a blended, web-based master’s programme. Glob Health Action. 2019;12:1652022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilkison A, Pairman S, McAra-Couper J, et al. Midwifery education in New Zealand: education, practice and autonomy. Midwifery. 2016;33:31–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogren M, Begum F, Erlandsson K. The historical development of the midwifery profession in Bangladesh. J Asian Midwives. 2017;4:65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Castro Lopes S, Nove A, ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Bokosi M, Moyo NT, et al. A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14:37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland J, van Teijlingen E, Kemp J. Twinning in Nepal: the Royal College of Midwives UK and the Midwifery Society of Nepal working in partnership. J Asian Midwives. 2015;2:26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bogren MU, Wiseman A, Berg M. Midwifery education, regulation and association in six South Asian countries–a descriptive report. Sexual Reprod Healthcare. 2012;3:67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer CSE, Turkmani S, Rumsey M. The state of midwifery in small island Pacific nations. Women Birth. 2017;30:193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar