The role of participation and community mobilisation in preventing violence against women and girls: a programme review and critique

References

• Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, et al. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002;360:1083–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet [Internet]. 2002;359:1423–1429. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11978358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise LL What works to prevent partner violence? An Evidence Overview Working paper (version 2.0). 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsberg M, Arango DJ, Morton M, et al. Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say? Lancet [Internet]. 2015;385:1555–1566. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25467575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyegombe N, Starmann E, Devries KM, et al. “SASA! Is the medicine that treats violence”. Qualitative findings on how a community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women created change in Kampala, Uganda. Glob Health Action [Internet]. 2014;7:25082. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25226421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramsky T, Devries K, Kiss L, et al. Findings from the SASA! Study: A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Med [Internet]. 2014 cited 2020 May 7;12:122. Available from: http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J, et al. Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337:391–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michau L, Horn J, Bank A, et al. Prevention of violence against women and girls: lessons from practice. Lancet. 2015;385:1672–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal PA. Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. Dev. Pract. 2007;17:539–548.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin SB, Kangere M What is participation. Community-based Rehabil. As a Particip. Strateg. Africa. 2002;37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayakumar G. Collective demands and secret codes: the multiple uses of “community” in “community mobilization.”. World Dev [Internet]. 2018;104:173–182. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X17303716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook T. Where participatory approaches meet pragmatism in funded (health) research: the challenge of finding meaningful spaces. Forum Qual. Sozialforsch./Forum Qual. Soc. Res. Particip. Qual. Res. [Internet]. 2012;13. Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1783/3305
   Google Scholar
• McTaggart R. Guiding principles for participatory action research. In: Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. 1st ed. New York, USA: Suny Press; 1997. p 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall A, Brock K. Beyond buzzwords “poverty reduction”,“participation” and “empowerment” in development policy. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz L. Toward authentic participatory research in health: a critical review. Pimatisiwin. 2003;1:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell C. Community mobilisation in the 21st century: updating our theory of social change? J Health Psychol [Internet]. 2014 cited 2020 May 7;19:46–59. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1359105313500262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held D. Introduction to critical theory: horkheimer to Habermas. California, USA: University of California Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Mannell J, Dadswell A. Preventing intimate partner violence: towards a framework for supporting effective community mobilisation. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2017;27:196–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Cornish F, Gibbs A, et al. Heeding the push from below: how do social movements persuade the rich to listen to the poor? J. Health Psychol. 2010;15:962–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Cornish F. Towards a “fourth generation” of approaches to HIV/AIDS management: creating contexts for effective community mobilisation. AIDS Care. 2010;22:1569–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire P. Education for critical consciousness: bloomsbury academic [Internet]. Paulo Freire Read. 1974 cited 2020 May 7. Available from: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/education-for-critical-consciousness-9781780937816/
   Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Jovchelovitch S. Health, community and development: towards a social psychology of participation. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2000;10:255–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahnema M. Participatory action research: the “last temptation of saint” development. Altern. Glob. Local, Polit. [Internet]. 1990 cited 2020 May 7;15:199–226. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/030437549001500204
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin S, Pridmore P. Partners in planning: information, participation and empowerment. London, UK: Macmillan; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs A, Dunkle K, Ramsoomar L, et al. New learnings on drivers of men’s physical and/or sexual violence against their female partners, and women’s experiences of this, and the implications for prevention interventions New learnings on drivers of men’s physical and/or sexual violence against their female partners, and women’s experiences of this, and the implications for prevention interventions. Glob Health Action. 2020 cited 2020 May 7. DOI:10.1080/16549716.2020.1739845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol [Internet]. 2013 cited 2020 May 7;13:117. Available from: https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva MJ, Breuer E, Lee L, et al. Theory of change: A theory-driven approach to enhance the medical research council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials [Internet]. 2014 cited 2020 May 7;15:267. Available from: https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1745-6215-15-267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MiGeProf. Gender based violence training [Internet]. Rwanda: Ministry of Gender and Family Promotion; 2011. Available from: https://migeprof.gov.rw/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/GBV_Training_MODULE_English_Version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PFP Congo. Pigs for peace [Internet]. DRC: Promotion de la Famille Paysanne; 2011. Available from: https://www.pfpcongo.com/en-home
   Google Scholar
• International Inspiration. STOP GBV [Internet]. UK: Department for International Development; 2013. Available from: http://www.internationalinspiration.org/women-and-girls
   Google Scholar
• International Rescue Committee. Programme EA$E [Internet]. UK: International Rescue Commitee; 2014. Available from: https://gbvresponders.org/empowerment/eae-tools-resources/
   Google Scholar
• Raising voices, Voices TGBVPN and R. In her shoes: a toolkit for reflecting on violence against women in Sub-Saharan Africa [Internet]. Perspectives R, editor. Earn. From Pract. Ser. Uganda; 2011. Available from: http://raisingvoices.org/resources/.
   Google Scholar
• Salamander Trust. Stepping stones project [Internet]. Uganda: Salamander Trust; 2011. Available from: https://steppingstonesfeedback.org/resources/gender-based-violence/
   Google Scholar
• Population Council. Abriendo Oportunidades [Internet]. New York, USA: Population Council; 2019. Available from: https://www.popcouncil.org/about/leadership#Country_Directors
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam. We can campaign. UK: Oxfam; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Usdin S, Scheepers E, Goldstein S, et al. Achieving social change on gender-based violence: a report on the impact evaluation of Soul City’s fourth series. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2005;61:2434–2445. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16006028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARE. Great Lakes Advocacy Initiative (GLAI) [Internet]. Burundi: CARE; 2011. Available from: https://www.care.org/sites/default/files/documents/GBV-2012-Advocacy-guide-for-grassroots-activists-for-GBV-Burundi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher A, De Wet J, Bonell CP, et al. Promoting critical consciousness and social mobilization in HIV/AIDS programmes: lessons and curricular tools from a South African intervention [Internet]. Health Educ Res. 2011 cited 2020 May 7; 542–555. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/her/article/26/3/542/735899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevethan R. Deconstructing and assessing knowledge and awareness in public health research. Front Public Health. 2017;5:194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers R. Institute of development studies (Brighton E. Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Eff. Routledge. 2009;3:110–140.
   Google Scholar
• Michau L. Approaching old problems in new ways: community mobilisation as a primary prevention strategy to combat violence against women. Gend. Dev. [Internet]. 2007;15:95–109. .
   Google Scholar
• Moeller K. Proving “The Girl Effect”: corporate knowledge production and educational intervention. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2013;33:612–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichter M. Project community diagnosis: participatory research as a first step toward community involvement in primary health care. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19:237–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall A, Pratt G. The use and abuse of participatory rural appraisal: reflections from practice. Agric. Human Values. 2011;28:263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conchelos G, Kassam Y. A brief review of critical opinions and responses on issues facing participatory research. Convergence. 1981;14:52.
   Google Scholar