3,072
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Playing the complex game of social status in school – a qualitative study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 1819689 | Received 20 Apr 2020, Accepted 01 Sep 2020, Published online: 05 Oct 2020

References

  • Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don’t. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:3–12.
  • Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365:1099–1104.
  • Boynton-Jarrett R, Ryan LM, Berkman LF, et al. Cumulative violence exposure and self-rated health: longitudinal study of adolescents in the United Status. Pediatrics. 2008;122:961.
  • Plenty S, Mood C. Money, peers and parents: social and economic aspects of inequality in youth wellbeing. J Youth Adolescence. 2016;45:1294–1308.
  • Siahpush M, Singh G. A multivariate analysis of the association between social class of origin and current social class with self‐rated general health and psychological health among 16‐year‐old Australians. Aust N Z J Med. 2000;30:653–659.
  • Hagquist C. Health inequalities among adolescents - the impact of academic orientation and parents’ education. Eur J Public Health. 2006;17:21–26.
  • Euteneuer F. Subjective social status and health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27:337–343.
  • Singh-Manoux A, Marmot MG, Adler NE. Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosom Med. 2005;67:855–861.
  • Goodman E, Adler NE, Kawachi I, et al. Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics. 2001;108:e31.
  • Joffer J, Flacking R, Bergström E, et al. Self-rated health, subjective social status in school and socioeconomic status in adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:785.
  • Diehl K, Hoebel J, Sonntag D, et al. Subjective social status and its relationship to health and health behavior: comparing two different scales in university students. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017;31. DOI:10.1515/ijamh-2017-0079
  • Åslund C, Leppert J, Starrin B, et al. Subjective social status and shaming experiences in relation to adolescent depression. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:55–60.
  • Sweeting H, Hunt K. Adolescent socio-economic and school-based social status, health and well-being. Soc Sci Med. 2014;121:39–47.
  • Sweeting H, Hunt K. Adolescent socioeconomic and school-based social status, smoking, and drinking. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57:37–45.
  • Finkelstein DM, Kubzansky LD, Goodman E. Social status, stress, and adolescent smoking. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:678–685.
  • Lemeshow AR, Fisher L, Goodman E, et al. Subjective social status in the school and change in adiposity in female adolescents: findings from a prospective cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:23–28.
  • Fournier MA. Adolescent hierarchy formation and the social competition theory of depression. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2009;28:1144–1172.
  • Hiltunen L. Lagom perfekt: erfarenheter av ohälsa bland unga tjejer och killar [The pursuit of restrained perfection: experiences of ill health among adolescent girls and boys]. Lund: Arkiv förlag; 2017.
  • Adler PA, Adler P. Peer power: preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press; 1998.
  • Cillessen AHN, Marks PEL. Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In: Cillessen AHN, Schwartz D, Mayeux L, editors. Popularity in the peer system. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 25–56.
  • Cillessen AH, Mayeux L. From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Dev. 2004;75:147–163.
  • Rose AJ, Swenson LP, Waller EM. Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Dev Psychol. 2004;40:378–387.
  • Stoltz S, Cillessen AH, van den Berg YH, et al. Popularity differentially predicts reactive and proactive aggression in early adolescence. Aggress Behav. 2016;42:29–40.
  • Cillessen AHN. Toward a theory of popularity. In: Cillessen AHN, Schwartz D, Mayeux L, editors. Popularity in the peer system. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 273–299.
  • Juvonen J, Graham S, Schuster MA. Bullying among young adolescents: the strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics. 2003;112:1231–1237.
  • Thornberg R. Schoolchildren’s social representations on bullying causes. Psychol Sch. 2010;47:311–327.
  • Merten DE. The meaning of meanness: popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociol Educ. 1997;70:175–191.
  • Schwartz D, Gorman AH. The high price of high status: popularity as a mechanism of risk. In: Cillessen AHN, Schwartz D, Mayeux L, editors. Popularity in the peer system. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 245–270.
  • Sweet E. “If your shoes are raggedy you get talked about”: symbolic and material dimensions of adolescent social status and health. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:2029–2035.
  • Rose AJ, Glick GC, Smith RL. Popularity and gender: the two cultures of boys and girls. In: Cillessen AHN, Schwartz D, Mayeux L, editors. Popularity in the peer system. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 103–122.
  • LaFontana KM, Cillessen AH. Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Dev Psychol. 2002;38:635–647.
  • Closson LM. Status and gender differences in early adolescents’ descriptions of popularity. Soc Dev. 2009;18:412–426.
  • Eder D. The cycle of popularity: interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociol Educ. 1985;58:154–165.
  • Lundberg J. Social status: a state of mind? [Doctoral thesis]. Linköping: Linköping University; 2008.
  • Presser S, Couper MP, Lessler JT, et al. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opin Q. 2004;68:109–130.
  • Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996.
  • Public Health Agency of Sweden. Kommunfaktablad [Facts about municipalities] [Internet]. [cited 2019 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/kommunfakta/
  • Joffer J, Jerdén L, Öhman A, et al. Exploring self-rated health among adolescents: a think-aloud study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:156.
  • Sandelowski M. Theoretical saturation. In: Given LM, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 875–876.
  • Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001;1:385–405.
  • Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1675–1683.
  • Garandeau CF, Lee IA, Salmivalli C. Inequality matters: classroom status hierarchy and adolescents’ bullying. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43:1123–1133.
  • Connell R. Gender in world perspective. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2009.
  • Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1385–1401.
  • Connell RW. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of Califonia Press; 1995.
  • Human Development Report Office Team. Human development data (1990–2018) [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Sept 23]. Available from: http://www.hdr.undp.org/en/data
  • Ellsberg M, Arango DJ, Morton M, et al. Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say? Lancet. 2015;385:1555–1566.
  • Rysst M. Popularity, gender, and social inclusion among girls in ethnically diverse contexts in Norway. Int J Child Fam Stud. 2020;11:45–69.
  • Martinsson L, Reimers E. Skola i normer [School in norms]. 2nd ed. Malmö: Gleerup; 2014.
  • Glenn EN. Racial ethnic women’s labor: the intersection of race, gender and class oppression. Rev Radic Political Econ. 1985;17:86–108.
  • Hankivsky O. Intersectionality 101. The Institute for Intersectionality Research Policy, SFU; 2014:1–24. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279293665_Intersectionality_101
  • Hankivsky O. Intersectionality 101. The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, SFU; 2014:1–34. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279293665_Intersectionality_101
  • Read B, Francis B, Skelton C. Gender, popularity and notions of in/authenticity amongst 12‐year‐old to 13‐year‐old school girls. Br J Sociol Educ. 2011;32:169–183.
  • Gådin KG, Hammarström A. “We won’t let them keep us quiet … gendered strategies in the negotiation of power-implications for pupils’ health and school health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:303–311.
  • Wiklund M. Close to the edge. Discursive, embodied and gendered stress in modern youth [Doctoral thesis]. Umeå: Umeå University; 2010.
  • Tolman DL, Davis BR, Bowman CP. “That’s just how it is”: a gendered analysis of masculinity and femininity ideologies in adolescent girls’ and boys’ heterosexual relationships. J Adolesc Res. 2015;31:3–31.
  • Strömbäck M, Formark B, Wiklund M, et al. The corporeality of living stressful femininity: a gender-theoretical analysis of young Swedish women’s stress experiences. Young. 2014;22:271–289.
  • Sandell A. Utbildningssegregation och självsortering - Om gymnasieval, genus och lokala praktiker [Educational segregation and self-sorting - Choices of upper-seconday school education, gender and local practices] [Doctoral thesis]. Malmö: Malmö University; 2007.
  • Panican A. Väljer unga fel? – grundskoleelevers attityder till gymnasievalet [Does adolescents choose wrong? - elementary school childrens’ attitudes about upper secondary school programs]. Lund: Lund University and Ratio; 2015. ( Report No.: 19).
  • Glenn EN. Racial ethnic women’s labor: the intersection of race, gender, and class oppression. In: Blumberg RL, editor. Gender, family, and economy: the triple overlap. Sage focus editions. Vol. 125. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1991. p. 173–201.
  • Lykke N. Intersectional gender pedagogy. In: Lundberg A, Werner A, editors. Gender studies education and pedagogy. A series on gender studies. Gothenburg: Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research; 2014. p. 14–17.
  • Sentse M, Kretschmer T, Salmivalli C. The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status: age‐related and gender differences. Soc Dev. 2015;24:659–677.
  • Flacking R, Jerdén L, Bergström E, et al. ‘In or out’—on the dynamic between acceptance and rejection and its influence on health in adolescent girls. Young. 2014;22:291–303.
  • Randell E, Jerdén L, Öhman A, et al. Tough, sensitive and sincere: how adolescent boys manage masculinities and emotions. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2016;21:486–498.
  • Almquist Y. A class of origin: the school class as a social context and health disparities in a life-course perspective [Doctoral thesis]. Stockholm: Stockholm University; 2011.
  • Mayeux L. Effects of popularity and gender on peers’ perceptions of prosocial, antisocial, and jealousy-eliciting behaviors. Merrill-Palmer Q. 2011;57:349–374.