Key issues for participatory research in the design and implementation of humanitarian assistance: a scoping review

References

• Ramalingam B, Rush H, Bessant J, et al. Strengthening the humanitarian innovation ecosystem. Brighton, Eastbourne: University of Brighton; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs. In: Policy analysis and innovation section world humanitarian data and trends 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA); 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tan YA, von Schreeb J. Humanitarian assistance and accountability: what are we really talking about? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30:264–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalingam B. Aid on the edge of chaos: rethinking international cooperation in a complex world. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moyo D. Dead Aid: why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. New York, United States: Macmillan; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield P. Life in crisis: the ethical journey of doctors without borders. Berkeley, California: Univ of California Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy J, Alexander J, Kiani M. Humanitarian accountability report. London, United Kingdom: Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance (ALNAP); 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Foran MP, Williams AR. Global uptake of the humanitarian accountability partnership over its first ten years. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29:413–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ager A, Burnham G, Checchi F, et al. Strengthening the evidence base for health programming in humanitarian crises. Science. 2014;345:1290–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet K, Roberts B, Sistenich V, et al. An evidence review of research on health interventions in humanitarian crises. London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kohrt BA, Mistry AS, Anand N, et al. Health research in humanitarian crises: an urgent global imperative. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Haar G, Heijmans A, Hilhorst D. Interactive research and the construction of knowledge in conflict-affected settings. Disasters. 2013;37:S20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corburn J. Street science: community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hall BL. Participatory research, popular knowledge and power: A personal reflection. Convergence. 1981;14:6.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari AMC, Graham ID. Defining integrated knowledge translation and moving forward: a response to recent commentaries. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2017;6:299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, et al. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90:311–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salsberg J, Parry D, Pluye P, et al. Successful strategies to engage research partners for translating evidence into action in community health: a critical review. J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Anåker A, Heylighen A, Nordin S, et al. Design quality in the context of healthcare environments: a scoping review. HERD Health Env Res Des J. 2017;10:136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320:50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane. LMIC filters 2012. 2012. Available from: https://epoc.cochrane.org/lmic-filters
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. LMIC country list. 2018; [cited 2020 Mar 17] Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18:179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks L, Moroni C, Rivera IC, et al. “Losing the tombola”: a case study describing the use of community consultation in designing the study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a mental health intervention in two conflict-affected regions. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16:31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelems M, Currie V. Listening to Iraqi refugee children in Jordan, but then what? Exploring the impact of participatory research with children. Dev Pract. 2012;22:600–612.
   Google Scholar
• Tansey CM, Pringle J, Davé A, et al. Earthquakes to floods: A scoping review of health-related disaster research in low-and middle-income countries. PLoS Curr Disasters. 2018 Aug 30;10:10.
   Google Scholar
• Tanabe M, Pearce E, Krause SK. “Nothing about us, without us”: conducting participatory action research among and with persons with disabilities in humanitarian settings. Action Res. 2018;16:280–29834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmusharaf K, Byrne E, O’Donovan D. Social and traditional practices and their implications for family planning: a participatory ethnographic study in Renk, South Sudan. Reprod Health. 2017 Jan 17;14:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass N, Ramazani P, Tosha M, et al. A congolese-US participatory action research partnership to rebuild the lives of rape survivors and their families in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Glob Public Health. 2012;7:184–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulrahim S, El Shareef M, Alameddine M, et al. The potentials and challenges of an academic–community partnership in a low-trust urban context. J Urban Health. 2010;87:1017–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi RA, Makhoul J, El Hajj T, et al. Developing a logic model for youth mental health: participatory research with a refugee community in Beirut. Health Policy Plan. 2011;26:508–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones T, Ho L, Kun KK, et al. Rebuilding people-centred maternal health services in post-Ebola Liberia through participatory action research. Glob Public Health. 2018;13(11):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edström J, Dolan C. Breaking the spell of silence: collective healing as activism amongst refugee male survivors of sexual violence in Uganda. J Refugee Stud. 2018;32:175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhoul J, Nakkash R, Harpham T, et al. Community-based participatory research in complex settings: clean mind-dirty hands. Health Promot Int. 2014 Sep;29:510–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmusharaf K, Byrne E, Manandhar M, et al. Participatory ethnographic evaluation and research: reflections on the research approach used to understand the complexity of maternal health issues in South Sudan. Qual Health Res. 2017 Jul;27:1345–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MB, Brown D, Jean I. Time to listen: hearing people on the receiving end of international aid. Cambridge, UK: CDA Collaborative Learning Projects; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hearod JB, Wetherill MS, Salvatore AL, et al. Community-based participatory intervention research with American Indian communities: what is the state of the science? Curr Dev Nutr. 2019;3:39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’toole TP, Aaron KF, Chin MH, et al. Community-based participatory research: opportunities, challenges, and the need for a common language. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivier C, Hunt MR, Ridde V. NGO–researcher partnerships in global health research: benefits, challenges, and approaches that promote success. Dev Pract. 2016;26:444–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik KB. Now is the time to deliver: looking for humanitarian innovation’s theory of change. J Int Humanitarian Action. 2017;2:8.
   Google Scholar
• Eyben R. Power, mutual accountability and responsibility in the practice of international aid: A relational approach. Brighton, UK: IDS; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hilhorst D. Classical humanitarianism and resilience humanitarianism: making sense of two brands of humanitarian action. J Int Humanitarian Action. 2018;3:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Krystalli R, Ott E. Evidence synthesis in the humanitarian sector: a guidance note. Boston, United States: Oxfam–Feinstein International Center; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Karris MY, Dubé K, Moore AA. What lessons it might teach us? Community engagement in HIV research. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020;15:142–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod KE, Korchinski M, Young P, et al. Supporting women leaving prison through peer health mentoring: A participatory health research study. CMAJ Open. 2020;8:E1.
   Google Scholar
• Raanaas RK, Bjøntegaard HØ, Shaw L. A scoping review of participatory action research to promote mental health and resilience in youth and adolescents. Adolesc Res Rev. 2018 Oct 1;5:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DL, Kahawita TM, Cairncross S, et al. The impact of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to control cholera: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magone C, Neuman M, Weissman F. Humanitarian negotiations revealed: the MSF experience. Hurst. 2012. p. 216.
   Google Scholar