2,595
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special issue: Readiness for Sugar Sweetened Beverage Taxation in Sub-Saharan Africa

The data availability landscape in seven sub-Saharan African countries and its role in strengthening sugar-sweetened beverage taxation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 1871189 | Received 01 Jul 2020, Accepted 29 Dec 2020, Published online: 20 Apr 2021

References

  • Bennett JE, Stevens GA, Mathers CD, et al. NCD countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards sustainable development goal target 3.4. Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392:1072–13.
  • Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392:1923–1994.
  • Global Health Data Exchange | GHDx. [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 4]. Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/
  • Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393:1958–1972.
  • Malik VS, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: an update of the evidence. Nutrients. 2019 Aug;11:1840.
  • World Health Organization. Taxes on sugary drinks: why do it? [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260253
  • Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA, Gervais S, et al. Nutrition agenda setting, policy formulation and implementation: lessons from the mainstreaming nutrition initiative. Health Policy Plan. 2012 Jan 1;27:19–31.
  • Baker P, Hawkes C, Wingrove K, et al. What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the united nations decade of action on nutrition. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 1;3:e000485.
  • World Cancer Research Fund International. Building momentum: lessons on implementing a robust sugar sweetened beverage tax. 2018;36.
  • Manyema M, Veerman LJ, Chola L, et al. The potential impact of a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on obesity in South African adults: a mathematical model. Plos One. 2014 Aug 19;9:e105287.
  • World Health Organization. Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases: technical meeting report, 5–6 May 2015. Geneva, Switzerland [Internet]: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250131/1/9789241511247-eng.pdf?ua=1
  • NOURISHING database [Internet]. World cancer research fund. 2016. [cited 2019 Nov 27]. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/nourishing-database
  • Holmes MD, Dalal S, Volmink J, et al. Non-communicable diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: the case for cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2010 May 11;7:e1000244.
  • Thow A, Erzse A, Asiki G, et al. Study design: policy landscape analysis for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in seven sub-Saharan African countries. 2021;14(1).
  • Mytton OT, Eyles H, Ogilvie D. Evaluating the health impacts of food and beverage taxes. Curr Obes Rep. 2014 Dec 1;3:432–439.
  • Saxena A, Stacey N, Puech PDR, et al. The distributional impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: findings from an extended cost-effectiveness analysis in South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 1;4:e001317.
  • South Africa market analysis : fitch solutions [Internet]. Fitch Solutions. 2019. [cited 2019 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.fitchsolutions.com/topic/south-africa
  • Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep 1;15:239–246.
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec 1;19:349–357.
  • Fabic M, Choi Y, Bird S. A systematic review of demographic and health surveys: data availability and utilization for research. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:604–612.
  • STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS) [Internet]. World Health Organization. [cited 2019 Mar 22]. Available from: http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/en/
  • Food balance sheets [Internet]. Food and agribulture organization of the united nations. 2013. [cited 2019 Jul 29]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS
  • PMA2020 nutrition survey - urkina Faso and Kenya: measurement innovations report [Internet]. Bill & Melinda Gates institute for population and reproductive health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg school of public health. 2019. Available from: https://www.pma2020.org/sites/default/files/Nuturion_Measurement_Innovations_DIGITAL.pdf
  • Technical consultation on measuring nutrition in population-based household surveys and associated facility assessments [Internet]. Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, USA agency for international development. 2018. [cited 2019 Jul 1]. Available from: https://datadent.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Nutrition-Data-Convening-Meeting-Report-Full.pdf
  • Kupka R, Siekmans K, Beal T. The diets of children: overview of available data for children and adolescents. Global Food Secur. 2020 Dec 1;27:100442.
  • Tangcharoensathien V, Srisookwatana O, Pinprateep P, et al. Multisectoral actions for health: challenges and opportunities in complex policy environments. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 16;6:359–363.
  • Marasini MK, Mugenyi S. Overcoming the limits of evidence on effective multisectoral nutrition policy. Food Nutr Bull. 2016 Dec 1;37:S183–4.
  • Armstrong R, Doyle J, Lamb C, et al. Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: the role of evidence. J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Jun;28:168–172.