The role of evaluation in iterative learning and implementation of quality of care interventions

References

• Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. High-quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1196–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill PS. Understanding global health governance as a complex adaptive system. Glob Public Health. 2011;6:593–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds M, Sarriot E, Swanson RC, et al. Navigating systems ideas for health practice: towards a common learning device. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24:619–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews M, Pritchett L, Woolcock M. Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). World Dev. 2013;51:234–244 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Evaluation science. Am J Eval. 2018;39:183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonehara A, Saito O, Hayashi K, et al. The role of evaluation in achieving the SDGs. Sustain Sci. 2017;12: 969–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minary L, Trompette J, Kivits J, et al. Which design to evaluate complex interventions? Toward a methodological framework through a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambon L, Terral P, Alla F. From intervention to interventional system: towards greater theorization in population health intervention research. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:979–983 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CY, Shulha LM. Insights on using developmental evaluation for innovating: a case study on the cocreation of an innovative program. Am J Eval. 2015;36:358–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper LM, Dickson R. Using developmental evaluation principles to build capacity for knowledge mobilisation in health and social care. Evaluation. 2019;25:330–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Adams A, Sedalia S, McNab S, et al. Lessons learned in using realist evaluation to assess Maternal and Newborn health programming in rural Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney MV, Boldosser-Boesch A, McCallon B. Quality, equity, and dignity for women and babies. Lancet. 2016;388:2066–2068. . [Internet]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy HP, Cheyney M, Dahlen HG, et al. Asking different questions: a call to action for research to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child. Birth. 2018;45:222–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Singh D, Montagu D, et al. Putting women at the center: a review of Indian policy to address person-centered care in maternal and newborn health, family planning and abortion. BMC Public Health. 2017;18:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhinaraset M, Afulani P, Diamond-Smith N, et al. Advancing a conceptual model to improve maternal health quality: the person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity. Gates Open Res. 2017;1:1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jain AK, Hardee K. Revising the FP quality of care framework in the context of rights-based family planning. Stud Fam Plann. 2018;49:171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Millennium Development Goals. UN [Internet]; 2000 [cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/about/en/
   Google Scholar
• Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN maternal mortality estimation inter-agency group. Lancet. 2016;387:462–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemayehu M, Mekonnen W. The prevalence of skilled birth attendant utilization and its correlates in North West Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2015;1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/436938
   Google Scholar
• WHO – UN Sustainable Development Summit. WHO [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/meetings/2015/un-sustainable-development-summit/en/
   Google Scholar
• Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C, et al. Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. Lancet. 2016;388:2307–2320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public health and welfare: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global. 2017;268.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine: crossing the Quality Chasm: a New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. 1966;44: 166–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones RW. A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. Stud Family Plann. 2000;31:35–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven JH, Tolhurst RJ, Tang S, et al. What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery. 2012;28:e676–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin A, Langer A, Salam RA, et al. Approaches to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health care: an overview of the evidence. Reprod Health. 2014;11:S1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi S, De Costa A, Raven J. Does the Janani Suraksha Yojana cash transfer programme to promote facility births in India ensure skilled birth attendance? A qualitative study of intrapartum care in Madhya Pradesh. Glob Health Action. 2018;8:1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter A. Patient engagement—what works? J Ambul Care Manage. 2012;35:80–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hibbard JH, Jessica G. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff. 2013;32:207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter A, Roberts S, Dixon A Delivering better services for people with long-term conditions: building the house of care. King’s Fund [Internet]; 2013. [cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/delivering-better-services-for-people-with-long-term-conditions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad N, Ellins J, Krelle H et al. Person-centred care: from ideas to action. Health Foundation [Internet]; 2014. [cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/PersonCentredCareFromIdeasToAction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James J Patient engagement. Health Aff.[Internet]; 2013.[cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10377/hpb20130214.898775/full/
   Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Street RLJ Jr. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9: 100–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons JA, Lavery JV. Brokered dialogue: a new research method for controversial health and social issues. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore B, Vallières F, McAuliffe E, et al. The last one heard: the importance of an early-stage participatory evaluation for programme implementation. Implement Sci. 2014;9:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kananura RM, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Paina L, et al. Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:55-68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber KJ, Graft-Johnson JED, Bhutta ZA, et al. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007;370:1358–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Moyer CA, et al. Next generation maternal health: external shocks and health-system innovations. Lancet. 2016;388:2296–2306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrmeister FC, Restrepo-Mendez MC, Franca GV, et al. Summary indices for monitoring universal coverage in maternal and child health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:903–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392:1341–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Story WT, Moran AC. Assessing the continuum of care pathway for maternal health in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20:281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi K, Okawa S, Zamawe COF, et al. Effectiveness of continuum of care – linking pre-pregnancy care and pregnancy care to improve neonatal and perinatal mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer MA. Mapping the patient journey across the continuum: lessons learned from one patient’s experience. J Patient Exp. 2019;6:103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Kyei NNA, Campbell OMR, Gabrysch S. The influence of distance and level of service provision on antenatal care use in rural Zambia. PLoS One. 2012;7:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami ND, Schmitz MM, Sanchez T, et al. Understanding local spatial variation along the care continuum: the potential impact of transportation vulnerability on HIV linkage to care and viral suppression in high-poverty areas, Atlanta, Georgia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72:65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willie TC, Stockman JK, Keene DE, et al. Social networks and its impact on women’s awareness, interest, and uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80:386–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill M, Huff A, Chumbler N. Variation in networks and forms of support for care-seeking across the HIV care continuum in the Rural Southeastern USA. J Rural Health. 2018;34:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricca J, Kureshy N, Leban K, et al. Community-based intervention packages facilitated by NGOs demonstrate plausible evidence for child mortality impact. Health Policy Plan. 2013;29:204–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman J, Darmstadt GL, Agarwal S, et al. Community-based intervention packages for improving perinatal health in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34:462–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman S, Srinivasan K, Kurpad A, et al. My mother … my sisters … and my friends: sources of maternal support in the perinatal period in urban India. Midwifery. 2014;30:130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, et al. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26:289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury ME, Botlero R, Koblinsky M, et al. Determinants of reduction in maternal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: a 30-year cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370:1320–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Personalised care and support planning handbook. NHS [Internet]; 2015; [cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from:https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/core-info-care-support-planning-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Couture M, et al. Partners for the optimal organisation of the healthcare continuum for high users of health and social services: protocol of a developmental evaluation case study design. BMJ Open. 2014;4:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Campbell OM, et al. Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action. Lancet. 2006;368:1535–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhimannil KB, Henning-Smith CE, Hardeman RR. Reducing maternal health disparities: the rural context. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:193–194 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization.Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. WHO Press [Internet]; 2009. Available from https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/9789241547734/en/
   Google Scholar
• Kruk ME, Freedman LP. Assessing health system performance in developing countries: a review of the literature. Health Policy. 2008;85:263–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irimu G, Ogero M, Mbevi G, et al. Approaching quality improvement at scale: a learning health system approach in Kenya. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103:1013–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English M, Irimu G, Agweyu A, et al. Building learning health systems to accelerate research and improve outcomes of clinical care in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med. 2016;13:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;11:1–12 [Internet].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T, et al. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2004;58:788–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenso B, Manzano A, Uzochukwu B, et al. Dealing with context in logic model development: reflections from a realist evaluation of a community health worker programme in Nigeria. Eval Program Plann. 2019;73:97–110 [Internet].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivier De Sardan JP, Diarra A, Moha M. Travelling models and the challenge of pragmatic contexts and practical norms: the case of maternal health. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:71-87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraamwinkel N, Ekbrand H, Davia S, et al. The influence of maternal agency on severe child undernutrition in conflict-ridden Nigeria: modeling heterogeneous treatment effects with machine learning. PLoS One. 2019;14:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist synthesis: an introduction(Paper 2). ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester. 2004. Available from http://betterevaluation.org/sites/default/files/RMPmethods2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kemp L. Adaptation and fidelity: a recipe analogy for achieving both in population scale implementation. Prev Sci. 2016;17:429–438 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RJ. Human rights and maternal health: exploring the effectiveness of the Alyne decision. J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41:103–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trelles Centurion M, Crestani R, Dominguez L, et al. Surgery with limited resources in natural disasters: what is the minimum standard of care? Curr Trauma Reports. 2018;4: 89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:509–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnes Miltenburg A, Lambermon F, Hamelink C, et al. Maternity care and human rights: what do women think? BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016;16:1–10 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, et al. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125:932–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388:2176–2192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt G, O’Donnell C, Sridharan S. Building on Julian Tudor Hart’s example of anticipatory care. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2011;12:1.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer N, Berhanu D, Bhattacharya D, et al. The stars seem aligned: a qualitative study to understand the effects of context on scale-up of maternal and newborn health innovations in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria. Global Health. 2016;12:1–13 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SL. Political contexts and maternal health policy: insights from a comparison of south Indian states. Soc Sci Med. 2014;100:46–53 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Bergström A, Hoa DTP, et al. Sustainability of knowledge implementation in a low- and middle- income context: experiences from a facilitation project in Vietnam targeting maternal and neonatal health. PLoS One. 2017;12:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridharan S, Pereira A, Hay K, et al. Heterogeneities in utilization of antenatal care in Uttar Pradesh, India: the need to contextualize interventions to individual contexts. Glob Health Action. 2018;11:1517929 [Internet].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belaid L, Ridde V. Contextual factors as a key to understanding the heterogeneity of effects of a maternal health policy in Burkina Faso? Health Policy Plan. 2015;30:309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witter S, Palmer N, Balabanova D, et al. Health system strengthening—reflections on its meaning, assessment, and our state of knowledge. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019;34:e1980–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzón-Flórez CE, Fernández-Niño JA, Ruiz-Rodríguez M, et al. Determinants of performance of health systems concerning maternal and child health: a global approach. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanneving L, Kulane A, Iyer A, et al. Health system capacity: maternal health policy implementation in the state of Gujarat, India. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucagu M, Kagubare JM, Basinga P, et al. Impact of health systems strengthening on coverage of maternal health services in Rwanda, 2000-2010: a systematic review. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20:50–61 [Internet].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NS, Huicho L, Afnan-Holmes H, et al. Countdown to 2015 country case studies: systematic tools to address the “black box” of health systems and policy assessment. BMC Public Health. 2016;16 [Internet]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3402-5.
   Google Scholar