Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Uganda: a policy landscape analysis

References

• The Republic of Uganda, Ministry of Health. Sector Development Plan 2015/16–2019/20. Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Health; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Non-communicable Diseases (NCD) Country Profiles-Uganda, 2018. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (2002: Geneva, Switzerland). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Geneva; 28 January – 1 February 2002
   Google Scholar
• Aggblade S, Duodu KG, Kabasa JD, et al. Emerging Early Actions to Bend the Curve in Sub-Saharan Africa’s Nutrition Transition. Food Nutr Bull. 2016;37:219–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda, World Health Organization (WHO), UNDP, World Diabetes Foundation. Non Communicable Disease Risk Factor Baseline Survey 2014. Uganda: Ministry of Health; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Kampala, Uganda and Rockville, Maryland, USA: UBOS and ICF; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Settumba SN, Sweeney S, Seeley J, et al. The health system burden of chronic disease care: an estimation of provider costs of selected chronic diseases in Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Jun;20:781–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers HE, Akiteng AR, Mutungi G, et al. Capacity of Ugandan public sector health facilities to prevent and control non-communicable diseases: an assessment based upon WHO-PEN standards. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 6;18:606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audain K, Levy L, Ellahi B. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in the early years and implications for type-2 diabetes: a sub-Saharan Africa context. Proc Nutr Soc. 2019;78:547–553. Epub 2019 Feb 28. PMID: 30816084..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu S, Vellakkal S, Agrawal S, et al. Averting obesity and type 2 diabetes in 377 India through sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an economic-epidemiologic modeling study. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiwanuka SN, Åstrøm AN, Trovik TA. Sugar snack consumption in Ugandan schoolchildren: validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34:372–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily Monitor [Internet]. The fights in Uganda’s soda business; 2015 Feb 24 [cited 2020 Mar 25]; [ about 2 screens]. Available from: https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/prosper/the-fights-in-uganda-s-soda-business-1601528
   Google Scholar
• Fitch Solutions. Namibia Food & Drink Report Q1 2019. Uganda: Fitch Solutions; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson RS, McGrady B, Gostin L, et al. Legal capacities required for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;97:108–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases: technical meeting report 2015 May 5–6. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Colchero MA, Molina M, Guerrero-López CM. After Mexico implemented a tax, purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages decreased and water increased: difference by place of residence, household composition, and income level. J Nutr. 2017;147:1552–1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thow AM, Jan S, Leeder S, et al. The impact of fiscal policy interventions for diets, obesity and chronic disease: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim SA, Kruger P, Hofman K. Industry strategies in the parliamentary process of adopting a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa: a systematic mapping. Global Health. 2020 Dec;16:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dua M, Tugendhaft A, Erzse A, et al. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes: industry Response and Tactics. Yale J Biol Med. 2018;91:185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thow AM, Erzse A, Asiki G, et al. Study Design: policy landscape analysis for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in seven sub-Saharan African countries. Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan;14:1856469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Longman; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank[Internet]. Databank: world Development Indicators. [ cited 2020 Mar 25]; [ about 3 screens]. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar
• Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Uganda National Household Survey 2016/2017. Kampala, Uganda: UBOS; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda. Second National Development Plan 2015/16 –2019/20 (NDPII), Draft. Kampala, Uganda: Republic of Uganda; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda. The National Food and Nutrition Strategy. Uganda: Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Health Animal Industry & Fisheries; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda. Health Sector Development Plan 2015/16–2019/20. Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Health; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The republic of Uganda. Community Health Department, Non communicable disease. Available from: https://health.go.ug/community-health-departments/non-communicable-diseases
   Google Scholar
• Uganda Revenue Authority (URA). Handbook on Benefiting from the National Budgets. Uganda: URA; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Uganda. The HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2014. Uganda: Government of Uganda; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• New Vision [Internet]. Soft drinks manufacturers implore government on taxes; 2019 May 22. [cited 2020 Feb 12] [ about 2 screens] Available from: https://www.newvision.co.ug/new_vision/news/1500732/soft-drinks-manufacturers-implore-government-taxes
   Google Scholar
• The Monitor [Internet]. Uganda: producers of Soft Drinks Protest Tax Increments On Products; 2017. [updated 2017 May 26; cited 2020 Feb 12] [ about 1 screen]. Available from: https://allafrica.com/stories/201705260012.html
   Google Scholar
• Uganda Revenue Authority. Handbook for the URA Annual Breakfast under the Theme: benefiting from the National Budgets, 18 June 2018. Uganda: URA; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Uganda. Report of the committee on Finance, Planning and Economic Development on the Excise duty (Amendment) Bill, 2018. Uganda: Office of the Clerk to Parliament; May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• New Vision [Internet]. MPs asked to increase tax on sodas, energy drinks. 2019 Apr 25 [cited 2020 Mar 25] [ about 2 screens]. Available from: https://www.newvision.co.ug/new_vision/news/1499225/mps-increase-tax-sodas-energy-drinks
   Google Scholar
• Stacey N, Mudara C, Ng SW, et al. Sugar-based beverage taxes and beverage prices: evidence from South Africa’s Health Promotion Levy. Soc Sci Med. 2019;238:112465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRICELESS SA [Internet]. Fiscal Policies For Population Health in South Africa. Johannesburg: PRICELESS South Africa; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Manyema M, Veerman LJ, Chola L, et al. The Potential Impact of a 20% Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Obesity in South African Adults: a Mathematical Model. Plos One. 2014;9:e105287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Africa Check [Internet]. SA’s proposed sugar tax: claims about calories & job losses checked. [ updated 2018 Feb 7; cited 2019 Nov 15]. Available from: https://africacheck.org/reports/sas-proposed-sugar-tax-claims-calories-job-losses-checked/
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda. Vision 2040. Kampala, Uganda: Governemnt of Uganda Kampala; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda. The Excise Duty (AMENDMENT) (NO.2) ACT,2018. Uganda: Parliamaent library; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda. The Second National Health Policy: promoting People’s Health to Enhance Socio-economic Development. Uganda: Republic of Uganda; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda. National Agriculture Policy. Uganda: Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry, and Fisheries and Ministry of Health; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• The Republic of Uganda, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries. Agriculture sector strategic plan 2015/16–2019/20. Uganda: Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• NilePost [Internet]. Beverage firms decry high taxes. [ Updated 2018 Feb 22; cited 2019 Nov 19] Available from: https://nilepost.co.ug/2018/02/22/beverage-firms-decry-high-taxes/
   Google Scholar
• The Independent [Internet]. President Museveni meets executives of Soft drinks companies. [ Updated 13 April 2016; cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.independent.co.ug/pepsi-coca-cola-officials-meet-museveni/
   Google Scholar
• ParliamantWatch [Internet]. Against excise duty on carbonated soft drinks. [ Updated 2014 Nov 27; cited 2019 Nov 16]. Available from: http://parliamentwatch.ug/motion/against-excise-duty-on-carbonated-soft-drinks/#.XGOoYrhRXDc
   Google Scholar
• CocaCola [Internet]. Coca-Cola Beverages Africa Uganda invests $8.35million in brand new manufacturing line. [ Updated 2018 Apr 23; cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.coca-colaafrica.com/stories/brand-new-manufacturing-line-in-uganda
   Google Scholar
• Kyakala [Internet]. Here is Coca-Cola’s sponsorship package to the MTN marathon. Hassan Kibirige [ Updated 2018 Nov 17; cited 2019 Nov 23] Available from: https://kyakala.com/coca-colas-sponsorship-package-mtn-marathon/
   Google Scholar
• The Independent [Internet]. Coke unveils more sugar-free soda. [ Updated 2018 Dec 18; cited 2019 Nov 23]. Kampala, Uganda. Available from: https://www.independent.co.ug/coke-unveils-more-sugar-free-soda/
   Google Scholar
• Mialon M, Swinburn B, Sacks G. A proposed approach to systematically identify and monitor the corporate political activity of the food industry with respect to public health using publicly available information. Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2015 Jul;16:519–530.
   Google Scholar