Informing ‘good’ global health research partnerships: A scoping review of guiding principles

References

• Obamba MO, Mwema JK. Symmetry and asymmetry: new contours, paradigms, and politics in African academic partnerships. High Educ Policy. 2009;22:349–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley M. Whose agenda? Power, policies and priorities in North-South research partnerships. In: Mougeot LJA, editor. Putting knowledge to work: collaborating, influencing and learning for international development. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing; 2017. p. 37–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M. Championing equity, empowerment, and transformational leadership in (mental health) research partnerships: aligning collaborative agenda work with the global development agenda. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boum Y II, Burns BF, Siedner M, et al. Advancing equitable global health research partnerships in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E, Hunt M, Master Z. Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery JV, Green SK, Bandewar SVS, et al. Addressing ethical, social, and cultural issues in global health research. PLOS Neglect Trop D. 2013;7:e2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkan F, Uduma O, Lawal SA, et al. Developing a framework for successful research partnerships in global health. Globalization Health. 2016;12:17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plamondon K, Caxaj CS, Graham ID, et al. Connecting knowledge with action for health equity: a critical interpretive synthesis of promising practices. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier L, Sieleunou I, Kalolo A. Deconstructing the notion of “global health research partnerships” across Northern and African contexts. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19:49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Hatfield J, Afsana K, et al. Making a commitment to ethics in global health research partnerships: a practical tool to support ethical practice. J Biomed Inq. 2015;12:137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research. CCGHR principles for global health research [Internet]. 2015 Nov [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.ccghr.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/CCGHR-Principles-for-GHR-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jentsch B, Pilley C. Research relationships between the South and the North: cinderella and the ugly sisters? Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1957–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plamondon K, Walters D, Campbell S, et al. Promoting equitable global health research: a policy analysis of the Canadian funding landscape. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universities Canada. North-South mobility in Canada’s universities [Internet]. 2018 Jan [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.univcan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/north-south-mobility-in-canadas-universities-report-january-2018accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Raza M. Collaborative healthcare research: some ethical considerations. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005;11:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethinking Research Collaborative. Promoting fair and equitable research partnerships to respond to global challenges [Internet]. 2018 Sep [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://rethinkingresearchpartnerships.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/fair-and-equitable-partnerships_research-report-public.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Global health data access principles [Internet] 2011 Apr [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/documents/data-access-principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries. A guide for transboundary research partnerships [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: http://www.cohred.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/A-guide-for-transboundary-research-partnerships.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council. North-South research partnerships: issues and challenges [Internet] 2001 Sep [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/RAWOO-2001-North.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Costello A, Zumla A. Moving to research partnerships in developing countries. BMJ. 2000;321:827–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plamondon K, Bisung E. The CCGHR principles for global health research: centring equity in research, knowledge translation, and practice. Soc Sci Med. 2019;239:112530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhoff AP, Crouse HL, Lukolyo H, et al. Partnerships for global child health. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20163823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östlin P, Schrecker T, Sadana R, et al. Priorities for research on equity and health: towards an equity-focused health research agenda. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health Promot Int. 1992;6:217–228.
   Google Scholar
• Baretto ML, De Almeida-filho N, Breilh J. Epidemiology is more than discourse: critical thoughts from Latin America. J Epidemiol Commun H. 2001;55:158–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmoshuk AN, Guantai AN, Mwangu M, et al. What makes international global health university partnerships higher-value? An examination of partnership type and activities favoured at four East African universities. Ann Glob Health. 2018;84:139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plamondon KM. A tool to assess alignment between knowledge and action for health equity. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsana K, Habte D, Hatfield J, et al. Partnership assessment toolkit [Internet]. 2009 Dec [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.ccghr.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/PAT_web_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Research Fairness Initiative. RFI implementation guide [Internet]. 2018 Mar [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://rfi.cohred.org/wp-content/uploads/RFI_Implementation_Guide_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siriwardhana C, Lignou S, Doherty S, et al. Research ethics tool [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.elrha.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Elrha-R2HC-Research-Ethics-Tool.-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Using logic models. In: Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE, editors. Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010. p. 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Birch AP, Tuck J, Malata A, et al. Assessing global partnerships in graduate nursing. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:1288–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar