Tailoring youth-friendly health services in Nigeria: a mixed-methods analysis of a designathon approach

References

• Ruria EC, Masaba R, Kose J, et al. Optimizing linkage to care and initiation and retention on treatment of adolescents with newly diagnosed HIV infection. AIDS. 2017;31:S253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization WH. Adolescent friendly health services: an agenda for change. In: World Health Organization. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. Making health services adolescent friendly: developing national quality standards for adolescent friendly health services. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tylee A, Haller DM, Graham T, et al. Youth-friendly primary-care services: how are we doing and what more needs to be done? Lancet. 2007;369:1565–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musheke M, Ntalasha H, Gari S, et al. A systematic review of qualitative findings on factors enabling and deterring uptake of HIV testing in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FMOH FMoH. National strategic framework on the health & development of adolescents & young people in Nigeria (2007–2011) 2007. Available from: https://www.prb.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/National-Strategic-Framework-on-the-Health-and-Development-of-Adolescents-and-Young-People-in-Nigeria-2007-2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oginni AB, Adebajo SB, Ahonsi BA. Trends and determinants of comprehensive knowledge of HIV among adolescents and young adults in Nigeria: 2003-2013. Afr J Reprod Health. 2017;21:26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulli L, Ridgeway K, Packer C, et al. A social media–based support group for youth living with HIV in Nigeria (SMART Connections): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld AF, Agolory SG, Shiraishi RW, et al. Antiretroviral therapy enrollment characteristics and outcomes among HIV-infected adolescents and young adults compared with older adults—seven African countries, 2004–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odo AN, Samuel ES, Nwagu EN, et al. Sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) for adolescents in Enugu state, Nigeria: a mixed methods approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nmadu AG, Mohamed S, Usman NO. Adolescents’ utilization of reproductive health services in Kaduna, Nigeria: the role of stigma. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies. 2020: 1–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidelines on HIV self-testing and partner notification: supplement to consolidated guidelines on hiv testing services Geneva: world Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2019 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK401675/.
   Google Scholar
• Asuquo S, Tahlil K, Muessig KE, et al., editors. Youth engagement in HIV prevention intervention research in sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review. APHA’s 2020 VIRTUAL Annual Meeting and Expo (Oct 24-28); 2020: American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker JD, Tang W, Li H, et al. Crowdsourcing designathon: a new model for multisectoral collaboration. BMJ Innovations. 2018;4:46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Artiles JA, Wallace DR, Borrowing from hackathons: overnight designathons as a template for creative idea hubs in the space of hands-on learning, digital learning, and systems re-thinking. WEEF, Cartagena. 2013;
   Google Scholar
• Iwelunmor J, Ezechi O, Obiezu-Umeh C, et al. The 4 youth by youth HIV self-testing crowdsourcing contest: a qualitative evaluation. Plos One. 2020;15:e0233698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T. Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization WH, UNICEF. Crowdsourcing in health and health research: a practical guide. World Health Organization; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• 4YBY. 4 youth by youth 2020. Available from: https://4yby.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Erlingsson C, Brysiewicz P. A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. Afr J Emergency Med. 2017;7:93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpinganjira S, Tchereni T, Gunda A, et al. Factors associated with loss-to-follow-up of HIV-positive mothers and their infants enrolled in HIV care clinic: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston E, Osborn A, Lyons T, et al., Exploring perceived social support from peer facilitators in an HIV treatment adherence intervention for African American patients: a content analysis of participant perspectives. 2015;Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 25:487–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115. Epub 2008/ 03/21. PubMed PMID: 18352969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider J, Stickdorn M. This is service design thinking: basics, tools, cases. Hoboken; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Trebble TM, Hansi N, Hydes T, et al. Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2010;341:c4078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zomerdijk L, Voss C. Service design for experience-centric services. Journal of Service Research - J SERV RES. 2010;13:67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winskell K, Enger D. A new way of perceiving the pandemic: the findings from a participatory research process on young Africans’ stories about HIV/AIDS. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11:453–67S253-S260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand M, Ahumada C, Watson S. CrowdOutAIDS: crowdsourcing youth perspectives for action. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahlil KM, Obiezu-Umeh C, Gbajabiamila T, et al. A designathon to co-create community-driven HIV self-testing services for Nigerian youth: findings from a participatory event. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wang JK, Pamnani RD, Capasso R, et al. An extended hackathon model for collaborative education in medical innovation. J Med Syst. 2018;42:239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang FC. Leaving no man behind: how differentiated service delivery models increase men’s engagement in HIV care. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.32
   Google Scholar
• Unaids H. Addressing a blind spot in the response to HIV—reaching out to men and boys. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS Geneva; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Global A. Communities at the centre, defending rights, breaking barriers, reaching people with HIV services, UNAIDS joint United Nations programme on HIV. update. AIDS Geneva:UNAIDS;2019. p. 283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Xiong Y, Sit HF, et al. A men who have sex with men–friendly doctor finder hackathon in Guangzhou, China: Development of a mobile health intervention to enhance health care utilization. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e16030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSIR. Countering Coronavirus With Open Social Innovation 2020. Available from: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/countering_coronavirus_with_open_social_innovation#.
   Google Scholar
• Kpokiri E, Chen E, Li J, et al. Social innovation research checklist: a crowdsourcing open call and digital hackathon to develop a checklist for research to advance social innovation in health. medRxiv. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bell J, Murray F, Davies E. An investigation of the features facilitating effective collaboration between public health experts and data scientists at a hackathon. Public Health. 2019;173:120–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar