3,605
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Institutional deliveries in India’s nine low performing states: levels, determinants and accessibility

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2001145 | Received 02 Aug 2021, Accepted 27 Oct 2021, Published online: 16 Dec 2021

References

  • World Health Organization. Maternal mortality: fact sheets. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Accessed on 20 September 2021.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
  • Kalter HD, Mohan P, and Mishra A, et al. Maternal death inquiry and response in India-the impact of contextual factors on defining an optimal model to help meet critical maternal health policy objectives. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011; 9: 41.
  • Khan N, Pradhan MR. Identifying factors associated with maternal deaths in Jharkhand, India: a verbal autopsy study. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31:262.
  • Prinja S, Bahuguna P, and Gupta R, et al. Coverage and financial risk protection for institutional delivery: how universal is provision of maternal health care in India? PLos One. 2015;10:e0137315.
  • Mishra PS, Veerapandian K, Choudhary PK. Impact of socio-economic inequity in access to maternal health benefits in India: evidence from Janani Suraksha Yojana using NFHS data. Plos One. 2021;16:e0247935.
  • Mohanty SK, Mishra RS, Mishra S, et al. Understanding equity of institutional delivery in public health centre by level of care in India: an assessment using benefit incidence analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:1–19.
  • Office of the Registrar General, Government of India. Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India 2016–18. Sample Registration System, 2020; Accessed on 25 June 2021. https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/MMR%20Bulletin%202016-18.pdf
  • Yadav AK, Jena PK, and Sahni B, et al. Comparative study on maternal healthcare services utilisation in selected empowered action group states of India. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29:1948–1959.
  • Baru R, Acharya A, Acharya S, et al. Inequities in access to health services in India: caste, class and region. Econ Political Weekly. 2010;45:49–58.
  • Joe W, Perkins JM, Kumar S, et al. Institutional delivery in India, 2004–14: unravelling the equity-enhancing contributions of the public sector. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:645–653.
  • World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Accessed on 22 July 2021. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf?sequence=1
  • Barman B, Roy A, Zaveri A, et al. Determining factors of institutional delivery in India: a study from national family health survey-4 (2015–16). Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2020;8:1335–1340.
  • Gopalan SS, Varatharajan D. Addressing maternal healthcare through demand side financial incentives: experience of Janani Suraksha Yojana program in India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:1–10.
  • Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington JA, et al. Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010;375:2009–2023.
  • International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National family health survey (NFHS)-4, 2015–16. India Mumbai: IIPS; 2017. Accessed on 28 July 2021. http://rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS-4Reports/India.pdf
  • Landrian A, Phillips BS, Singhal S, et al. Do you need to pay for quality care? Associations between bribes and out-of-pocket expenditures on quality of care during childbirth in India. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35:600–608.
  • Houweling TA, Ronsmans C, Campbell OM, et al. Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bullet World Health Organ. 2007;85:745–754.
  • Abebe F, Berhane Y, Girma B. Factors associated with home delivery in Bahirdar, Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:1–6.
  • Patel R, Marbaniang SP, Srivastava S, et al. Why women choose to delivery at home in india: a study of prevalence, factors, and socio-economic Inequality. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1785.
  • Sabde Y, Chaturvedi S, and Randive B, et al. Bypassing health facilities for childbirth in the context of the JSY cash transfer program to promote institutional birth: a cross-sectional study from Madhya Pradesh, India. PLos One. 2018;13:e0189364.
  • Gwatkin DR. Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do? Bullet World Health Organ. 2000;78:3–18.
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Janani Suraksha Yojana. Accessed on 20 July 2021. https://nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=3&lid=309&sublinkid=841
  • Gupta A, Fledderjohann J, Reddy H, et al. Barriers and prospects of India’s conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional delivery care: a qualitative analysis of the supply-side perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–12.
  • United Nations Population Fund-India. Concurrent assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in selected states of India. New Delhi: UNICEF; 2008. https://nhm.gov.in/WriteReadData/l892s/78619790621474872646.pdf 2009.
  • Mishra PS, Kumar P, Srivastava S. Regional inequality in the Janani Suraksha Yojana coverage in India: a geo-spatial analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20:1–4.
  • Randive B, Diwan V, De Costa A. India’s conditional cash transfer programme (the JSY) to promote institutional birth: is there an association between institutional birth proportion and maternal mortality? PloS One. 2013;8:e67452.
  • Randive B, San Sebastian M, and De Costa A, et al., Inequalities in institutional delivery uptake and maternal mortality reduction in the context of cash incentive program, Janani Suraksha Yojana: results from nine states in India. 2014;Soc Sci Med. 123:1–6.
  • Sidney K, Tolhurst R, and Jehan K, et al., ‘The money is important but all women anyway go to hospital for childbirth nowadays’-a qualitative exploration of why women participate in a conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional deliveries in Madhya Pradesh, India. 2016;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 16:1–14.
  • Bhattacharyya S, Issac A, Rajbangshi P, et al. “Neither we are satisfied nor they”-users and provider’s perspective: a qualitative study of maternity care in secondary level public health facilities, Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:1–13.
  • Sarkar P, and Tigga NS. Social inequality and institutional deliveries. Soc Change. 2018;48:85–103.
  • Saha R, Jungari S. Fear of childbirth amid COVID-19 in India: neglected aspect of maternal mental health. Int J Social Psychiatry. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020979019
  • Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388:2176–2192.
  • Montagu D, Landrian A, Kumar V, et al. Patient-experience during delivery in public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34:574–581.
  • Afulani PA, Phillips B, Aborigo RA, et al. Person-centred maternity care in low-income and middle-income countries: analysis of data from Kenya, Ghana, and India. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e96–109.
  • Sharma G, Penn-Kekana L, Halder K, et al. An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. Reprod Health. 2019;16:1–6.
  • World Health Organization. Standard for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Accessed on 10 June 2021. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/mca-documents/advisory-groups/quality-of-care/standards-for-improving-quality-of-maternal-and-newborn-care-in-health-facilities.pdf
  • Rao KD, Kachwaha S, Kaplan A, et al. Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e003033.
  • Powell-Jackson T, Mazumdar S, and Mills A. Financial incentives in health: new evidence from India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana. J Health Econ. 2015;43:154–169.
  • Vellakkal S, Reddy H, and Gupta A, et al., A qualitative study of factors impacting accessing of institutional delivery care in the context of India’s cash incentive program. 2017;Soc Sci Med. 178:55–65.
  • McFadden A, Gupta S, Marshall JL, et al. Systematic review of barriers to, and facilitators of, the provision of high‐quality midwifery services in India. Birth. 2020;47:304–321.
  • Karkee R, Lee AH, Binns CW. Bypassing birth centres for childbirth: an analysis of data from a community-based prospective cohort study in Nepal. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30:1–7.
  • Kruk ME, Mbaruku G, McCord CW, et al. Bypassing primary care facilities for childbirth: a population-based study in rural Tanzania. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24:279–288.
  • Sidney K, Ryan K, Diwan V, et al. Utilization of a state run public private emergency transportation service exclusively for childbirth: the Janani (maternal) express program in Madhya Pradesh, India. Plos One. 2014;9:e96287.
  • Mavalankar DV, Rosenfield A. Maternal mortality in resource-poor settings: policy barriers to care. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:200–203.
  • Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Annual health survey report: part I. Ministry of home affairs, Government of India.Accessed on 18 June 2021. https://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHS/AHS_report_part1.pdf
  • The World Bank. India States Briefs. 2018. Accessed on 18 June 2021. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2016/05/26/india-states-briefs
  • Ng M, Misra A, Diwan V, et al. An assessment of the impact of the JSY cash transfer program on maternal mortality reduction in Madhya Pradesh, India. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:24939.
  • Paul P, Chouhan P. Association between child marriage and utilization of maternal health care services in India: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Midwifery 2019;75:66–71.
  • Nasrullah M, Zakar R, Zakar MZ. Child marriage and its associations with controlling behaviors and spousal violence against adolescent and young women in Pakistan. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:804–809.
  • Raj A, Saggurti N, Lawrence D, et al. Association between adolescent marriage and marital violence among young adult women in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;110:35–39.
  • Speizer IS, Pearson E. Association between early marriage and intimate partner violence in India: a focus on youth from Bihar and Rajasthan. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26:1963–1981.
  • Srivastava J., and Joseph A. Why institutional deliveries are low in Balrampur District Uttar Pradesh: a cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative exploration. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69:445.
  • Paul PL, and Pandey S. Factors influencing institutional delivery and the role of accredited social health activist (ASHA): a secondary analysis of India human development survey 2012. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:1–9.
  • Paul P, Chouhan P. Socio-demographic factors influencing utilization of maternal health care services in India. Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2020;8:666–670.
  • Chaturvedi S, De Costa A, Raven J. Does the Janani Suraksha Yojana cash transfer programme to promote facility births in India ensure skilled birth attendance? A qualitative study of intrapartum care in Madhya Pradesh. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:27427.
  • Sen S, Chatterjee S, Khan PK, et al., Unintended effects of Janani Suraksha Yojana on maternal care in India. 2020;SSM-Population Health. 11:100619.
  • Gupta SK, Pal DK, Tiwari R, et al. Impact of Janani Suraksha Yojana on institutional delivery rate and maternal morbidity and mortality: an observational study in India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2012;30:464.
  • Department of Women & Child Development and Mission Shakti, Government of Odisha. MAMATA. Accessed on 28 September 2021.http://wcdodisha.gov.in/content/2/50#
  • Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), Government of Bihar. Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana (IGMSY), Accessed on 28 September 2021. http://www.icdsbih.gov.in/IGMSY.aspx
  • National Health Mission, Department of health & family welfare, govt. of U.P. Matra Evam Shishu Swasthya Sanrakshan Abhiyan 2015. Accessed on 28 September 2021. http://www.upnrhm.gov.in/Home/MCHCampaign
  • National Health Mission, Government of Madhya Pradesh. Gram Arogya Kendra: An innovation in health service delivery for universal health coverage. http://www.nhmmp.gov.in/WebContent/MPTast/Strengthening_Gram_Arogya_Kendra/Best_practice_document_GAK.pdf
  • Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1091–1110.
  • Sk MI, Paswan B, and Anand A, et al., Praying until death: revisiting three delays model to contextualize the socio-cultural factors associated with maternal deaths in a region with high prevalence of eclampsia in India. 2019;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 19:314.
  • Upadhyay RP, Rai SK, Krishnan A. Using three delays model to understand the social factors responsible for neonatal deaths in rural Haryana, India. J Trop Pediatr. 2013;59:100–105.
  • Mo’men MM, El Gelany S, and Eladwy AR, et al. A ten year analysis of maternal deaths in a tertiary hospital using the three delays model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:585.
  • Kumar S, Dansereau EA, Murray CJ. Does distance matter for institutional delivery in rural India? Appl Econ. 2014;46:4091–4103.