2,553
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Understanding women’s decision-making process for birth location in Tanzania based on individual women’s reproductive pathways: a life-course perspective

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2040149 | Received 09 Sep 2020, Accepted 04 Feb 2022, Published online: 24 Mar 2022

References

  • Montagu D, Sudhinaraset M, Diamond-Smith N, et al. Where women go to deliver: understanding the changing landscape of childbirth in Africa and Asia. Health Policy Plann. 2017;32:1146–16.
  • Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C, et al. Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. Lancet. 2016;388:2307–2320.
  • Campbell OMR, Calvert C, Testa A, et al. The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Lancet. 2016;388:2193–2208.
  • United Nations. The millenium development goals report 2014. New York: United Nations; 2014. Available from: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/reports.shtml
  • Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender E and C (MoHCDGEC) [Tanzania, Mainland], Ministry of Health (MoH) [Zanzibar], National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) O of the C, Government Statistician (OCGS) and I. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) 2015–16. Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Rockville (MD); 2016.
  • Gabrysch S, Campbell OMR. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:34.
  • Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, et al. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014;11:71.
  • Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10.
  • Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 2005;44:94–127.
  • Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1091–1110.
  • Giele J. Life stories to understand diversity. Variations by class, race and gender. In: Elder GHJ, Giele J, editors. The craft of life course research. Epub editing. New York: The Guilford Press; 2009. p. 235–257.
  • Lloyd CB, Mensch BS. Marriage and childbirth as factors in dropping out from school: an analysis of DHS data from sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Stud. 2008;62:1–13.
  • Jacob C, Cooper C, and Baird J, et al. What quantitative and qualitative methods have been developed to measure the implementation of a life-course approach in public health policies at the national level? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2019.
  • Elder GHJ, and Giele J. Life course studies an evolving field. In: Elder GHJ, and Giele J, editors. The craft of life course research. Epub editing. New York: The Guilford Press. 2009; 1–23 .
  • Scientific Advisory Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and, Gynaecologists. Why should we consider a life course approach to women’s health care? London; 2011. (Scientific Impact Paper No. 27).
  • Elder GHJ. Time, human agency, and social change: perspectives on the life course. Soc Psychol Q. 1994;57:4–15.
  • Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, et al. Women and health: the key for sustainable development. Lancet. 2015;386:1165–1210.
  • Solnes Miltenburg A, Kvernflaten B, Meguid T, et al. Towards renewed commitment to prevent maternal mortality and morbidity: learning from 30 years of maternal health priorities [Unpublished]. paper in review.
  • Hollos M, Larsen U. Motherhood in sub-Saharan Africa: the social consequences of infertility in an urban population in northern Tanzania. Cult Health Sex. 2008;10:159–173.
  • Sundby J, Mboge R, Sonko S. Infertility in the Gambia: frequency and health care seeking. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:891–899.
  • Rakotsoane F, and Nicolaides A. A critical discussion on the relevance of biosocial science research ethics codes and principles for social science researchers in Africa. In: Nortje N, Visagie R, and Wessels J, editors. Social science research ethics in Africa. eBook. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2019; 17–34 .
  • Moyer CA, Mustafa A. Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2013;10:40.
  • Glen H, Elder J. Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociol Theory. 2007;2:171–191.
  • Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1989;44:1175–1184.
  • Okkolin MA, Lehtomäki E, Bhalalusesa E. The successful education sector development in Tanzania - comment on gender balance and inclusive education. Gender Educ. 2010;22:63–71.
  • Coates D, Catling C. The use of ethnography in maternity care. Global Qual Nurs Res. 2021;8:233339362110281.
  • Solnes Miltenburg A, van Pelt S, Meguid T, et al. Disrespect and abuse in maternity care: individual consequences of structural violence. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26:88–106.
  • Solnes Miltenburg A, van Pelt S, and Kiritta RF, et al. Symphysis-fundal height, gestational age and its value for identification of foetuses at risk in rural Tanzania: a qualitative follow-up study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2021;5:140–149 .
  • Polkinghorne DE. Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 1995;8:5–23.
  • Mattingly C, Lawlor M. Learning from stories: narrative interviewing in cross-cultural research. Scand J Occup Ther. 2000;7:4–14.
  • Sandelowski M. Telling stories: narrative approaches in qualitative research. J Nurs School. 1991;23:161–166.
  • Polkinghorne DE. Validity issues in narrative research. Qual Inq. 2007;13:471–486.
  • Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2007.
  • Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358:483–488.
  • Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–13.
  • Maxwell J. Validity. How might you be wrong? In: Maxwell J, editor. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. 3rd ed. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage Publications; 2013. p. 121–138.
  • Spangler SA, Bloom SS. Use of biomedical obstetric care in rural Tanzania: the role of social and material inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:760–768.
  • Kumbani LC, Chirwa E, Malata A, et al. Do Malawian women critically assess the quality of care? A qualitative study on women’s perceptions of perinatal care at a district hospital in Malawi. Reprod Health. 2012;9:30.
  • Kabakian-Khasholian T, Campbell O, Shediac-Rizkallah MGF. Women’s experiences of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity? Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:103–113.
  • Marston C, Cleland J. Do unintended pregnancies carried to term lead to adverse outcomes for mother and child? An assessment in five developing countries. Popul Stud (NY). 2003;57:77–93.
  • Exavery A, Kanté AM, Hingora A, et al. How mistimed and unwanted pregnancies affect timing of antenatal care initiation in three districts in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:1–11.
  • Kabakyenga JK, Ostergren P-O, Turyakira E, et al. Influence of birth preparedness, decision-making on location of birth and assistance by skilled birth attendants among women in South-Western Uganda. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35747.
  • Solnes Miltenburg A, Lambermon F, Hamelink C, et al. Maternity care and human rights: what do women think ? BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016;1–10. DOI:10.1186/s12914-016-0076-0
  • Spangler SA. “To open oneself is a poor woman’s trouble”: embodied inequality and childbirth in South-Central Tanzania. Med Anthropol Q. 2011;25:479–498.
  • Roth Allen D. Managing motherhood, managing risk: fertility and danger in west central Tanzania. The University of Michigan Press: University of Michigan; 2004.