A lack of reproductive agency in facility-based births makes home births a first choice regardless of potential risks and medical needs—a qualitative study among multiparous women in Somaliland

References

• The World Bank. The World Bank data. 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 10]. Available from: https://dataworldbankorg/indicator/SHDYNNMRT
   Google Scholar
• WHO, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Maternity mortality: levels and trends 2000 to 2017. In: Sexual and reproductive health. Geneva. [cited 2020 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal-mortality-2000-2017/en/
   Google Scholar
• Black R, Laxminarayan R, Temmerman M, et al. Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. Washington (DC): The World Bank; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Definition of skilled health personnel providing care during childbirth: the 2018 joint statement by WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, ICM, ICN, FIGO and IPA. Geneva; 2020 [cited Nov 1]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272818/WHORHR
   Google Scholar
• Zahn CM, Remick A, Catalano A, et al. Levels of maternal care verification pilot: translating guidance into practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:1401–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctor HV, Radovich E, Benova L. Time trends in facility-based and private-sector childbirth care: analysis of demographic and health surveys from 25 sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2016. J Global Health. 2019;9:020406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner KM, Duke T, Bucens I. Reducing newborn mortality in the Asia-Pacific region: quality hospital services and community-based care. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49:511–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitsma A, Simioni J, Brunton G, et al. Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: a systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;21:100319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elder HR, Alio AP, Fisher SG. Investigating the debate of homebirth safety: a critical review of cohort studies focusing on selected infant outcomes. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016;13:297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarf VL, Rossiter C, Vedam S, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2018;62:240–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Planned home versus planned hospital births in women at low-risk pregnancy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;222:102–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comeau A, Hutton EK, Simioni J, et al. Homebirth integration into the health care systems of eleven international jurisdictions. Birth. 2018;45:311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedam S, Leeman L, Cheyney M, et al. Transfer from planned homebirth to hospital: improving interprofessional collaboration. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59:624–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielinski R, Ackerson K, Kane Low L. Planned homebirth: benefits, risks, and opportunities. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:361–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell OM, Calvert C, Testa A, et al. The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Lancet. 2016;388:2193–2208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384:1129–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nove A, Friberg IK, de Bernis L, et al. Potential impact of midwives in preventing neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a lives saved tool modelling study. Lancet. 2021;9:E24–E32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, et al. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 [cited 2020 Nov 1]:CD004667. PMID: 27121907. DOI:10.001002/14651858.CD14004667.pub14651855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (MoHD) MoHaD. Health sector strategic plan II. Hargeisa: Ministry of Health Development; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. The state of the world’s children 2009: maternal and newborn health. New York (NY): UNICEF; 2009. [cited 2021 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/media/84866/file/SOWC-2009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department CS. The Somaliland health and demographic survey. Ministry of Planning and National Development. Hargeisa: Somaliland Government; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• West F, Dawson A, Homer CSE. Building midwifery educator capacity using international partnerships: findings from a qualitative study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;25:66–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson A, Kililo M, Geita L, et al. Midwifery capacity building in Papua New Guinea: key achievements and ways forward. Women Birth. 2016;29:180–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, et al. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4:2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Polit D, Beck C. Nursing research- generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Standards for improving maternal and newborn quality of care in health facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2017 Feb 2]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/improving-mnh-health-facilities/en/
   Google Scholar
• Ndwiga C, Warren CE, Ritter J, et al. Exploring provider perspectives on respectful maternity care in Kenya: “work with what you have”. Reprod Health. 2017;14:99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balde MD, Bangoura A, Diallo BA, et al. A qualitative study of women’s and health providers’ attitudes and acceptability of mistreatment during childbirth in health facilities in Guinea. Reprod Health. 2017;14:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondele Gurara M, Van Geertruyden JP, Tariku Gutema B, et al. Maternity waiting homes as component of birth preparedness and complication readiness for rural women in hard-to-reach areas in Ethiopia. BMC. 2021;18:27.
   Google Scholar
• Yu S, Fiebig D, Scarf V, et al. Birth models of care and intervention rates: the impactof birth centres. Health Policy. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 20];124:1395–1402. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851020302542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller T, Smith H. Establishing partnership with traditional birth attendants for improved maternal and newborn health: a review of factors influencing implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working with individuals, families and communities to improve maternal and newborn health. Geneva: World Health Orgnaization; 2017. [cited 2021 Nov 30]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254989
   Google Scholar
• WHO. WHO recommendations on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/health-promotioninterventions/en/
   Google Scholar
• Pyone T, Adaji S, Madaj B, et al. Changing the role of the traditional birth attendant in Somaliland. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127:41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen HE, Lynam PF, Carr C, et al; Quality of M, Newborn Care Study Group of the M, Child Health Integrated P. Direct observation of respectful maternity care in five countries: a cross-sectional study of health facilities in East and Southern Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattison CA, Lavis JN, Wilson MG, et al. A critical interpretive synthesis of the roles of midwives in health systems. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Dec;18:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt L, Dalen HG, Hartz DL, et al. Leadership and management in midwifery-led continuity of care models: a thematic and lexical analysis of a scoping review. Midwifery. 2021;102986. DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2021.102986
   Google Scholar
• Cummins A, Coddington R, Fox D, et al. Exploring the qualities of midwifery-led continuity of care in Australia (MiLCCA) using the quality maternal and newborn care framwork. Women Birth. 2020;33:125–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994. p. 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Darteh EKM, Dickson KS, Doku DT. Women’s reproductive health decision-making: a multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0209985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed W, Azmat SK, Ali M, et al. Women’s empowerment and contraceptive use: the role of independent versus couples’ decision-making, from a lower middle income country perspective. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar