References
- Herrick T, Harner-Jay C, Shaffer C, et al. Modeling the potential impact of emerging innovations on achievement of Sustainable Development Goals related to maternal, newborn, and child health. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017;15:12.
- Bertone MP, Falisse JB, Russo G, et al. Context matters (but how and why?) A hypothesis-led literature review of performance based financing in fragile and conflict-affected health systems. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0195301–8.
- World Bank [Internet]. Program-for-results financing (PforR); [cited 2021 Sept 27]. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/program-for-results-financing
- USAID & Palladium [Internet]. Pay for results in development: a primer for practitioners; [cited 2021 Sept 27]. Available from: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1865/Pay_for_Performance_Primer_Final.pdf
- The Global Fund [Internet]. The global fund strategy 2017-2022; [cited 2021 Dec 2]. Available from: https://www.theglobalfund.org/media/2531/core_globalfundstrategy2017-2022_strategy_en.pdf
- Graham KER, Langlois-Klassen D, Adam SAM, et al. Assessing health research and innovation impact: evolution of a framework and tools in Alberta, Canada. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. Front Res Metr Anal. 2018;3. DOI:10.3389/frma.2018.00025.
- The International Development Innovation Alliance (IDIA) [Internet]. Insights on measuring the impact of innovation; 2017 [cited 2021 Sept 27]. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Measuring20Impact.pdf
- Bennett S, Lagomarsino G, Knezovich J, et al. Accelerating learning for pro-poor health markets. Glob Health. 2014;10:54.
- Bhattacharyya O, Mossman K, Ginther J, et al. Assessing health program performance in low- and middle-income countries: building a feasible, credible, and comprehensive framework. Glob Health. 2015;11:51.
- Langsam K, Clark C. Decoding the ABCs of effective enterprise acceleration: 10 lessons from the social entrepreneurship accelerator at duke (SEAD). Duke University; 2020 [cited 2021 Sept 27]. [Internet]. Available from: https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2020/10/Decoding-the-ABCs-of-Effective-Enterprise-Acceleration_Oct-12.pdf
- Gupta A, Thorpe C, Bhattacharyya O, et al. Promoting development and uptake of health innovations: the Nose to Tail Tool. F1000Res. 2016;5. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.8145.1
- Winfrey W, McKinnon R, Stover J. Methods used in the lives saved tool (LiST). BMC Public Health. 2011;11:S32.
- Fox MJ, Martorell R, van den Broek N, et al. Assumptions and methods in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). BMC Public Health. 2011;11:I1.
- PATH [Internet]. Harnessing the power of innovation to save mothers and children: how 11 innovations could save more than 6 million lives; 2016 [cited 2020 Sept 28]. Available from: https://www.path.org/resources/harnessing-the-power-of-innovation-to-save-mothers-and-children-how-11-innovations-could-save-more-than-6-million-lives/
- Yang H, Duvall S, Ratcliffe A, et al. Modeling health impact of global health programs implemented by Population Services International. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:S3.
- Healthy Newborn Network [Internet]. MANDATE: mobilizing innovations for maternal and neonatal health; 2011 [cited 2021 Nov 3]. Available from: https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/blog/mandate-mobilizing-innovations-for-maternal-and-neonatal-health/
- McClure EM, Rouse DJ, MacGuire ER, et al. The MANDATE model for evaluating interventions to reduce postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;121:5–9.
- RTI International [Internet]. Maternal and neonatal directed assessment of technology (MANDATE); [cited 2021 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.mandate4mnh.org/
- Grand Challenges Canada [Internet]. Evidence based innovation annual report (2015-2016); [cited 2021 Dec 2]. Available from: https://www.grandchallenges.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Annual_Report_EN_Sept2016.pdf
- PATH [Internet]. The IC 2030 report: reimaging global health; 2015 [cited 2021 Sept 27]. Available from: https://www.pqmd.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ic2030-Report-2015.pdf
- Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev. 2012;1:60.
- David PH. Introduction to use of health impact metrics for programmatic decision making in global health. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:S1,1471–2458-13-S2-S1.
- Biru B, Rajan S, Taylor A, et al. Evaluating saving lives at birth (SL@B): final evaluation report of round 1 through round 8 (2011-2020) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 2]. Available from: https://dukeghic.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2020/07/[email protected]
- Dixit S, Ogbuoji O, Fernholz F, et al. Evaluating saving lives at birth cost-effectiveness analysis: BEMPU-TEMPWATCH [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. Available from: https://sites.globalhealth.duke.edu/evidencelab/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2018/07/Bempu-CEA-Report.pdf
- Kumar V, Shearer JC, Kumar A, et al. Neonatal hypothermia in low resource settings: a review. J Perinatol. 2009;29:401–412.
- Byford S, Raftery J. Economics notes: perspectives in economic evaluation. BMJ. 1998;316:1529–1530.
- Maldonado G. Estimating causal effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:422–438.
- Dixit S, Ogbuoji O, Fernholz F, et al. Evaluating saving lives at birth cost-effectiveness analysis: Elizabeth Glaser pediatric AIDS foundation (EGPAF) - Pratt Pouch [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. Available from: https://sites.globalhealth.duke.edu/evidencelab/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2018/07/EGPAF-CEA-Report.pdf