Karyological and molecular studies between six species of Plantago in the Northern border region at Saudi Arabia

References

• McNeely JA, Miller KR, Reid WV, et al. Conserving the world’s biological diversity. Washington (DC): World Conservation Union, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund–US, and the World Bank; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Rao RV, Hodgkin T. Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002;68:1–19. doi: 10.1023/A:1013359015812
   Google Scholar
• Tutel B, Kandemir I, Kus S, et al. Classification of Turkish Plantago L. species using numerical taxonomy. Turk J Bot. 2005;29:51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Primack RB. Reproductive effort in annual and perennial species of Plantago (Plantaginaceae). Am Nat. 1979;114(1):51–62. doi: 10.1086/283453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyunt TM, Lwin KK, Aye TT, et al. Win, N.N: antihypertensive effect of Plantago major Linn. Whole plant (Ahkyawpaung-tahtaung) on mild to moderate hypertensive patients. Myanmar Health Sci Res J. 2007;19:97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Beara IN, Orcic DZ, Lesjak MM, et al. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry study of anti-inflammatory activity of plantain (Plantago L. species). J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;52:701–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma PK. Cytogenetic studies on some Himalayan species of the Genus Plantago L. PhD thesis, University of Jammu, Jammu; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Badr A, El-Kholy MA. Chromosomal studies in the Egyptian flora II. Karyotype studies in the genus Plantago L. Cytologia. 1987;52:725–731. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.52.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlova D, Tosheva A. Notes on karymorphology of Melilotus officinalis populations in Bulgaria. Caryologia. 2005;57:151–158. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2004.10589385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Sen S. Chromosome botany. Enfield (NH): Science Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman MI, Hafez EE, Zaghlol MS, et al. Karyotype analysis and chromosome evolution in three species of genus Plantago L. in Egypt. Asian J Adv Basic Sci. 2016;4(2):8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mondini L, Noorani A, Pagnotta MA. Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity. 2009;I:19–35. doi: 10.3390/d1010019
   Google Scholar
• Khurana-Kaul V, Kachhwaha S, Kothari SL. Characterization of genetic diversity in Jatropha curcas L. germplasm using RAPD and ISSR markers. Indian J Biotechnol. 2012;11:54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari N, Thakur SK. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-abreif review. Am J Anim Vet Sci. 2014;9:6–13. doi: 10.3844/ajavsp.2014.6.13
   Google Scholar
• Amirmoradi B, Talebi R, Karami E. Comparison of genetic variation and differentiation among annual Cicer species using start codon targeted (Scot) polymorphism, DAMD-PCR, and ISSR markers. Plant Syst Evol. 2012;298:1679–1688. doi: 10.1007/s00606-012-0669-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos L. Flora of Egypt. Volume III. Cairo: Al Hadara Publishing; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay D, Sharma AK. A new technique for orcein banding with acid treatment. Stain Technol. 1988;63(5):283–287. doi: 10.3109/10520298809107602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham Z, Parasad PN. A system of chromosome classification and nomenclature. Cytologia. 1983;48:95–101. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.48.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves A. Micro measure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome. 2001;44:439–443. doi: 10.1139/g01-037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:6531–6535. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collard BCY, Maackill DJ. Start codon Targted (Scot) polymorphism: a simple novel DNA marker technique for generating gene – targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;27:86–93. doi: 10.1007/s11105-008-0060-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson L. Systat 7.0. Chicago (IL): SPSS Inc; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Fregonezi JN, Fernandez T, Torezan JM, et al. Karyotype differentiation of four Cestrum species (Solanaceae) based on the physical mapping of repetitive DNA. Genet Mol Biol. 2006;29:97–104. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572006000100019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RW, Zhou YH, Zhand Y, et al. The genetic diversity among Leymus species based on random amplified microsatellite polymorphism (RAMP). Gent Resour Crop Evol. 2006;53:139–144. doi: 10.1007/s10722-004-1933-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh D. Chromosome and chromosome morphology in Plantaginaceae I. Gentica. 1934;16:1–44. doi: 10.1007/BF01837857
   Google Scholar
• Janighorban M. Plantago in Assadi, et al. Flora of Iran no.14: 1–53. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Badr SF. Relationships of some Plantago species. Taeckholmia. 1999;19(1):27–36. doi: 10.21608/taec.1999.12635
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo K, Noguchi J. Karyotype analysis of several Plantago species in Japan with special reference to taxonomic status of Plantago japonica. J Phytogeogr Taxon. 1989;37(1):27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs BD. Chromosomal studies on Plantago in Australia. Contrib N S W Nation Herb. 1973;4:399–405.
   Google Scholar
• Huziwara Y. Karyotype analysis in some genera of compositae. VIII. Further studies on the chromosome of Aster. Am J Bot. 1962;49:116–119. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1962.tb14916.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarco C. A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon. 1986;35:526–530. doi: 10.2307/1221906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo L, Yuan Q. The difference between the heterogeneity of the centromeirc index and intrachromosomal asymmetry. Plant Syst Evol J. 2011;297:141–145. doi: 10.1007/s00606-011-0528-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paplauskiene V, Dabkeviciene G. Genetic variability determination using ISSR-PCR markers in red clover varieties. Biologija. 2008;54(2):56–65. doi: 10.2478/v10054-008-0011-y
   Google Scholar
• Haneen WK. Cytogenetics and species interrelationships. Taechholmia. 2008;28:49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Aliyev RT, Abbasov MA, Mammadov AC. Genetic identification of diploid and tetraploid wheat species with RAPD markers. Turk J Biol. 2007;31:173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno N, Yamasaki M, Matsuoka Y, et al. Population structure of wild wheat D-genome progenitor Aegilops tauschii Coss.: implications for intraspecific lineage diver-sification and evolution of common wheat. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:999–1013. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahsyee SR, Al-Sloge O, Calic I, et al. Genetic diversity of alfalfa domesticated varietal populations from Libyan gene bank revealed by RAPD markers. Arch Biol Sci. 2013;65(2):595–602. doi: 10.2298/ABS1302595A
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez A, Fuentes JL, Puldon V, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Cuban traditional rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties, based on microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Biol. 2007;30(4):1109–1117. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572007000600014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaswan V, Joshi A, Maloo SR. Assessment of genetic diversity in Isabgol (Plantago ovata Forsk.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers for developing crop improvement strategies. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12(23):3622–3635.
   Google Scholar