On designing an assorted control charting approach to monitor process dispersion: an application to hard-bake process

References

• Page ES. Controlling the standard deviation by cusums and warning lines. Technometrics. 1963;5(3):307–315. doi:10.1080/00401706.1963.10490100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuprah K, Ncube M. A comparison of dispersion quality control charts. Seq Anal. 1987;6(2):155–163. doi:10.1080/07474948708836122.
   Google Scholar
• Ng CH, Case KE. Development and evaluation of control charts using exponentially weighted moving Averages. J Qual Technol. 1989;21(4):242–250. doi:10.1080/00224065.1989.11979182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi SA, Riaz M, Miller A, et al. EWMA dispersion control charts for normal and non-normal processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2015;31(8):1691–1704. doi:10.1002/qre.1702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz M. On Enhanced Interquartile range charting for process dispersion. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2015;31(3):389–398. doi:10.1002/qre.1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abujiya MR, Lee MH, Riaz M. New EWMA S2 control charts for monitoring process dispersion. Scientia Iranica. 2017;24(1):378–389. doi:10.24200/sci.2017.4041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu J, Chen M. Automated visual inspection expert system for multivariate statistical process control chart. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36(3, Part 1):5113–5118. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-González CJ, Colebrook M, Roda-García JL, et al. Developing a data analytics platform to support decision making in emergency and security management. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;120:167–184. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-F, Lin J-S, Cheng SW. A new nonparametric EWMA Sign control chart. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(5):6239–6243. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanusi RA, Riaz M, Abbas N, et al. Using FIR to improve CUSUM charts for monitoring process dispersion. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2017;33(5):1045–1056. doi:10.1002/qre.2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder SV, Hamilton MD. An EWMA for monitoring a process standard deviation. J Qual Technol. 1992;24(1):12–21. doi:10.1080/00224065.1992.11979369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TC, Gan FF. A cumulative Sum control chart for monitoring process variance. J Qual Technol. 1995;27(2):109–119. doi:10.1080/00224065.1995.11979574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin RW, Wolff H, Besenfelder W, et al. EWMA control charts for the smallest and largest observations. J Qual Technol. 1999;31(2):189–206. doi:10.1080/00224065.1999.11979914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta-Mejia CA, Pignatiello JJ, Venkateshwara Rao B. A comparison of control charting procedures for monitoring process dispersion. IIE Trans. 1999;31(6):569–579. doi:10.1080/07408179908969859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Cheng SW. Max chart: Combining X-bar chart and S chart. Stat Sin. 1998;8(1):263–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Cheng SW, Xie H. Monitoring process mean and variability with One EWMA chart. J Qual Technol. 2001;33(2):223–233. doi:10.1080/00224065.2001.11980069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng SW, Thaga K. (2010). The Max-CUSUM Chart BT - Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 9 (H.-J. Lenz, P.-T. Wilrich, W. Schmid, editors.). doi: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2380-6_6
   Google Scholar
• Castagliola P. A New S2-EWMA control chart for monitoring the process variance. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2005;21(8):781–794. doi:10.1002/qre.686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola P. A new CUSUM-S2 control chart for monitoring the process variance. J Qual Maint Eng. 2009;15(4):344–357. doi:10.1108/13552510910997724.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood R, Riaz M, Does RJMM. Control charts for location based on different sampling schemes. J Appl Stat. 2013;40(3):483–494. doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.740624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajadi JO, Riaz M, Al-Ghamdi K. On increasing the sensitivity of mixed EWMA–CUSUM control charts for location parameter. J Appl Stat. 2016;43(7):1262–1278. doi:10.1080/02664763.2015.1094453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. 8th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley; 2019, August.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson EB, Hilferty MM. The distribution of chi-square. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1931;17(12):684–688. doi:10.1073/pnas.17.12.684.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu Z, Jiao J, Yang M, et al. An enhanced adaptive CUSUM control chart. IIE Trans. 2009;41(7):642–653. doi:10.1080/07408170802712582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas N, Saeed U, Riaz M. Assorted control charts: an efficient statistical approach to monitor pH values in ecotoxicology lab. J Chemom. 2019;33(6):e3129), doi:10.1002/cem.3129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mutairi AO, Volodin A. Special cases in order statistics for the alternative parametrization of the generalized power function distribution. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2018;12(3):285–289. doi:10.1080/16583655.2018.1465726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basheer AM. Alpha power inverse Weibull distribution with reliability application. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2019;13(1):423–432. doi:10.1080/16583655.2019.1588488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq MAu, Elgarhy M, Hashmi S. The generalized odd Burr III family of distributions: properties, applications and characterizations. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2019;13(1):961–971. doi:10.1080/16583655.2019.1666785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithography Process Overview. 2019, December. http://www.imicromaterials.com/technical/lithography-process-overview.
   Google Scholar
• Fundamentals of Photolithography. 2019, October. https://www.uvu.edu/physics/nanotech/docs/fundamentals_of_photolithography.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Liu K, Kargupta H, Ryan J. Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2006;18(1):92–106. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2006.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargupta H, Datta S, Wang Q, et al. Random-data perturbation techniques and privacy-preserving data mining. Knowl Inf Syst. 2005;7(4):387–414. doi:10.1007/s10115-004-0173-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar