Accurate automatic classification system for 3D CT images of some vertebrate remains from Egypt

References

• Saraswati PK, Srinivasan M. Micropaleontology: principles and applications. Cham: Springer; 2016, pp. 35–77.
   Google Scholar
• Cucchi T, Mohaseb A, Peigné S, et al. Detecting taxonomic and phylogenetic signals in equid cheek teeth: towards new palaeontological and archaeological proxies. R Soc Open Sci. 2017;4(4):160997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucchi T, Papayianni K, Cersoy S, et al. Tracking the near western origins and European dispersal of the western house mouse. Sci Rep. 2020;10(8276):8276–8288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller L, Gonçalves GL, Cordeiro-Estrela P, et al. DNA barcoding of sigmodontine rodents: identifying wildlife reservoirs of zoonoses. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80282–e80294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flügel E. Microfacies of carbonate rocks: analysis, interpretation and application. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen JS, Korpela M, Williams JW, et al. Machine-learning based reconstructions of primary and secondary climate variables from north American and European fossil pollen data. Sci Rep. 2019;9:15805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams CD, Otarola-Castillo E. Geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2013;4:393–399. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barčiová L, Macholán M. Morphometric key for the discrimination of two wood mice species, Apodemus sylvaticus and A. flavicollis. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung. 2009;55(1):31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuruvilla J, Sukumaran D, Sankar A, et al. A review on image processing and image segmentation. International conference on data mining and advanced computing (SAPIENCE), Ernakulam, India, 2016. pp. 198–203.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. (2018). Digital image processing. Global Edition. Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Tahhan FE, Sakr AA, Aladle DA, et al. Improved image segmentation algorithms for detecting types of acute lymphatic leukemia. IET Image Proc. 2019;13(13):2595–2603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Zhang D, Huang K, et al. Image segmentation framework based on optimal multi-method fusion. IET Image Proc. 2019;13:186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar EZ. A refined denoising method for noisy phase-shifting interference fringe patterns. Opt Quantum Electron. 2021;53 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YT. Contrast enhancement using brightness-preserving bi-histogram equalization. IEEE Trans. Consum Electron. 1997;3:1447–1453.
   Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan T, Poornima N. Microscopic image segmentation using fuzzy C means for leukemia diagnosis. Int J Adv Res Sci Eng Technol. 2017;4:3136–3142.
   Google Scholar
• Otsu NA. Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica. 1975;11:62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsiantis SB. Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica . 2007;31:249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Paluszek M, Thomas S. MATLAB machine learning. Princeton (NJ): Apress; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bousquet O, Boucheron S, Lugosi G. Theory of classification: a survey of recent advances. ESAIM Probab. Stat. 2005;9:249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Tahhan FE, Fares ME, Sakr AA, et al. Accurate automatic detection of acute lymphatic leukemia using a refined simple classification. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83:1178–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar EZ. Investigation and classification of fibre deformation using interferometric and machine learning techniques. Appl Phys B. 2020;126:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedraza A, Bueno G, Deniz O, et al. ‘Automated diatom classification (part B): a deep learning approach. Appl Sci. 2017;7:460.
   Google Scholar
• Rehn E, Rehn A, Possemiers A. Fossil charcoal particle identification and classification by two convolutional neural networks. Quaternary Sci. Rev. 2019;226:106038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho LE, Fauth G, Fauth SB, et al. (2019). Automated microfossil identification and segmentation using a deep learning approach. DOI:10.1016/j.marmicro.2020.101890.
   Google Scholar
• Dey N, Rajinikanth V, Shi F, et al. Social-group-optimization based tumor evaluation tool for clinical brain MRI of flair/diffusion-weighted modality. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2019;39:843–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraru L, Moldovanu S, Traian Dimitrievici L, et al. Gaussian mixture model for texture characterization with application to brain DTI images. J Adv Res. 2019;16:15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldovanu S, Obreja C-D, Biswas KC, et al. Towards accurate diagnosis of skin lesions using feedforward back propagation neural networks. Diagnostics. 2021;11:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldovanu S, Toporaş LP, Biswas A, et al. Combining sparse and dense features to improve multi-modal registration for brain DTI images. Entropy. 2020;22:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugland Johansen T, Aagaard Sørensen S. Towards detection and classification of microscopic foraminifera using transfer learning; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Cui X, Canul-Ku M, et al. ADMorph: a 3D digital microfossil morphology dataset for deep learning. IEEE Access. 2020;8:148744–148756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevins N, Zambelli J, Li K, et al. Multicontrast x-ray computed tomography imaging using talbot-Lau interferometry without phase stepping. Med Phys. 2012;39(1):424–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugappan M, Mutawa A. Facial geometric feature extraction based emotional expression classification using machine-learning algorithms. PLOS ONE. 2021;16:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar EZ, Sokkar TZN, Hamza AA. In situ investigation and detection of opto-mechanical properties of polymeric fibres from their digital distorted microinterferograms using machine learning algorithms. Opt Laser Technol. 2020;129:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purwanti E, Evelyn C. Detection of acute lymphocyte leukemia using k-nearest neighbor algorithm based on shape and histogram features. J Phys. 2017;853:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gates G. The reduced nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1972;18:431–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel HH, Prajapati P. Study and analysis of decision tree based classification algorithms. Int J Comput Sci Eng. 2018;16:74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma H, Kumar S. A survey on decision tree algorithms of classification in data mining. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5:2094–2097.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong Y. The analysis of cases based on decision tree. 7th IEEE International conference on software engineering and service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, China, 2016.
   Google Scholar