Bayesian analysis for geometric shapes in additive manufacturing

References

• Oliveira JP, LaLonde AD, Ma J. Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Materials Design. 2020;193:108762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira JP, Santos TG, Miranda RM. Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: from theory to practice. Progress Materials Sci. 2020;107:100590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Zeng Z, Nematollahi M, et al. In-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysis of the elastic behaviour of martensite and H-phase in a NiTiHf high temperature shape memory alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Add Manuf Lett. 2021;1:100003.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes JG, Machado CM, Duarte VR, et al. Effect of milling parameters on HSLA steel parts produced by wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). J Manuf Process. 2020;59:739–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell T, Williams C, Ivanova O, et al. Could 3D printing change the world. In: Technologies, potential, and implications of additive manufacturing. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council; 2011. p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Tong K, Amine Lehtihet E, Joshi S. Parametric error modeling and software error compensation for rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping J. 2003;9(5):301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong K, Joshi S, Amine Lehtihet E. Error compensation for fused deposition modeling (FDM) machine by correcting slice files. Rapid Prototyping J. 2008;14(1):4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Zhang J, Sabbaghi A, et al. Optimal offline compensation of shape shrinkage for three-dimensional printing processes. IIE Trans. 2015;47(5):431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Nouri H, Xu K, et al. Statistical predictive modeling and compensation of geometric deviations of three-dimensional printed products. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014;136(6):061008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbaghi A, Huang Q, Dasgupta T. Bayesian model building from small samples of disparate data for capturing in-plane deviation in additive manufacturing. Technometrics. 2018;60(4):532–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Cheah C, Fuh J, et al. Influence of process parameters on stereolithography part shrinkage. Materials Design. 1996;17(4):205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon E, Mumford D. 2d-shape analysis using conformal mapping. Int J Comput Vision. 2006;70(1):55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Qin SJ, Huang Q. Offline predictive control of out-of-plane shape deformation for additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2016;138(12):121005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q. An analytical foundation for optimal compensation of three-dimensional shape deformation in additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2016;138(6):061010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Anwer N, Mathieu L. Deviation modeling and shape transformation in design for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 2017;60:211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo E, Colosimo BM. Statistical shape analysis of experiments for manufacturing processes. Technometrics. 2011;53(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Chen Y. Additive manufacturing based on optimized mask video projection for improved accuracy and resolution. J Manuf Processes. 2012;14(2):107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt A, Fateri M. 3D printing and its applications. RTejournal-Forum Rapid technol. 2013;2014:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sabbaghi A, Dasgupta T, Huang Q, et al. Inference for deformation and interference in 3D printing. Ann Appl Statist. 2014;8(3):1395–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sköld G, Vidarsson H. Analysing the potentials of 3D-printing in the construction industry: considering implementation characteristics and supplier relationship interfaces. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and hierarchical/multilevel models. New York (NY): Cambridge; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Park DK, Gelman A, Bafumi J. Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: state-level estimates from national polls. Political Anal. 2004;12(4):375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger JO. Prior information and subjective probability. In: Berger JO, editor. Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis. New York: Springer; 1985. p. 74–117.
   Google Scholar
• Oman SD. Specifying a prior distribution in structured regression problems. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1985;80(389):190–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Jakulin A, Pittau MG, et al. A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Ann Appl Statist. 2008;2(4):1360–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaderinezhad F, Ley C. On the impact of the choice of the prior in bayesian statistics. In: Tang N, editor. Bayesian inference on complicated data. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88994.
   Google Scholar
• Chen MH, Ibrahim JG, Yiannoutsos C. Prior elicitation, variable selection and bayesian computation for logistic regression models. J R Statist Soc Ser B (Statistical Methodol). 1999;61(1):223–242.
   Google Scholar
• Rafique M, Ali S, Shah I, et al. A comparison of different bayesian models for leukemia data. Amer J Math Manag Sci. 2021;41(3):244–258.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Nouri H, Xu K, et al. Predictive modeling of geometric deviations of 3d printed products-a unified modeling approach for cylindrical and polygon shapes. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). Silver Spring (MD): IEEE; 2014. p. 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. Ann Statist. 1984;12(4):1151–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng XL. Posterior predictive p-values. Ann Statist. 1994;22(3):1142–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichl J. Estimating marginal likelihoods from the posterior draws through a geometric identity. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 2020;26(3):205–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Anwer N, Mathieu L. Geometric deviation modeling with statistical shape analysis in design for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 2019;84:496–501.
   Google Scholar