Effect of Mth coherent state on the interaction between two two-level atoms and two-mode quantized field

References

• Jayness ET, Cummings FW. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc IEEE. 1963;51:89–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavis M, Cummings M. Exact solution for an N-molecule-radiation-field Hamiltonian. Phys Rev. 1968;170:379–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekert AK. Quantum cryptography based on Bell'stheorem. Phys Rev Lett. 1991;67:661–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls DF, Milburn GJ. Quantum optics. Berlin: Springer; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Furusawa A., Sørensen J.L., Braunstein S.L., et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science. 1998;282(5389):706–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Kim MS. Quantum Inf Comput. 2002;2:208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVoe RG, Brewer RG. Observation of superradiant and subradiant spontaneous emission of two trapped ions. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;76(12):2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turchette Q.A., Wood C.S., King B.E., et al. Deterministic entanglement of two trapped ions. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;81(17):3631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagley E., Maitre X., Nogues G., et al. Generation of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen pairs of atoms. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;79(1):1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempe G, Walther H, Klein N. Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one-atom maser. Phys Rev Lett. 1987;58(4):353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner RF. Quantum information – an introduction to basic theoretical concepts and experiments. Heidelberg: Springer; 2001. (Springer Tracts Modern Phys; Vol. 173).
   Google Scholar
• Bennet CH, Weisner SJ. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein–Podolsky–Rosenstates. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;69(20):2881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perina J. Quantum statistics of linear and nonlinear optical phenomena. Dordrecht: Reidel; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Scully MO, Zubairy MS. Quantum optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Meystre P., Zubairy M.S.. Squeezed states in the Jaynes–Cummings model. Phys Lett A. 1982;89(8):390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aravind PK, Hu GH. Influence of initial conditions on squeezing and anti-bunching in the Jaynes–Cummings model. Physica B+C. 1988;150(3):427.
   Google Scholar
• Fang MF, Swain S, Zhou P. Super-revivals, chaos, and entanglement of a trapped ion in a standing wave. Phys Rev A. 2000;63(1):013812.
   Google Scholar
• Nahla AA, Ahmed MMA. Nonclassical properties of asymmetric two two-level atoms interacting with multi-photon quantized field. Int J Mod Phys. 2018;32(23):1850250.
   Google Scholar
• Nahla AA, Ahmed MMA. Sensitivity measurement for asymmetric two two-level atoms interacting with field obeys SU(1, 1) Lie group via atomic inversion. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2019;13(1):309–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahla AA, Ahmed MMA, Alamri SZ. Analytical computation of nonclassical behavior for asymmetric two two-level atoms interacting with SU(1, 1) quantum system. Eur Phys J D. 2019;73(3):44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahla AA, Ahmed MMA. Multiphoton processes of two modes of quantized field interaction with interacting asymmetric two two-level atoms. Int J Theor Phys. 2021;60:3666–3688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauder JR, Skagerstam B. Coherent states. Singapore: World Scientific; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Gazeau JP. Coherent states in quantum physics. Berlin: Wiley-VCH; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Knöll L., Orl/owsk A.. Distance between density operators: applications to the Jaynes–Cummings model. Phys Rev A. 1995;51(2):1622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orl/owski A, Paul H, Kastelewicz G. Dynamical properties of a classical-like entropy in the Jaynes–Cummings model. Phys Rev A. 1995;52(2):1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal GS. Quantum optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Othman A, Yevick D. Quantum properties of the superposition of two nearly identical coherent states. Int J Theor Phys. 2018;57:2293–2308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman AA. The Mth coherent state. Int J Theor Phys. 2019;58:2451–2463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman A. Teleportion via the entangled derivative of coherent state. Quantum Inf Comput. 2019;19:0014–0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani A, Mojaveri B, Aryaie M, et al. Superposition of two-mode “Near” coherent states: non-classicality and entanglement. Quantum Inf Proc. 2019;18(5):148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani A, Mojaveri B, Bahrbeig RJ. “Near”-cat states nonclassicality and generation. J Russ Laser Res. 2019;40:121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani A, Mojaveri B, Alenabi AA. Excitation and depression of coherent state of the simple harmonic oscillator. 2019;60:083501.
   Google Scholar
• Othman AA. Mth coherent state induces patterns in the interaction of a two-level atom in the presence of nonlinearities. Int J Theor Phys. 2021;60:1574–1592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdalla MS, Khalil EM, Obada A-SF, et al. Quantum statistical characteristics of the interaction between two two-level atoms and radiation field. Eur Phys J Plus. 2015;130:227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husimi K. Some formal properties of the density matrix. Proc Phys Math Soc Jpn. 1940;22:264–314.
   Google Scholar