Development of species recognition models using Google teachable machine on shorebirds and waterbirds

References

• Mitchell T. Machine learning. New York: McGraw Hill; 1997; ISBN 0-07-042807-7. OCLC 36417892.
   Google Scholar
• Koza JR, Bennett FH, Andre D, et al. Automated design of both the topology and sizing of analog electrical circuits using genetic programming. In: Artificial intelligence in Design'96. Dordrecht: Springer; 1996. p. 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Onan A, Korukoğlu S, Bulut H. Ensemble of keyword extraction methods and classifiers in text classification. Expert Syst Appl. 2016;57:232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A, Korukoğlu S. A feature selection model based on genetic rank aggregation for text sentiment classification. J Inf Sci. 2017;43(1):25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A, Korukoğlu S, Bulut H. A hybrid ensemble pruning approach based on consensus clustering and multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for sentiment classification. Inf Process Manag. 2017;53(4):814–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A. An ensemble scheme based on language function analysis and feature engineering for text genre classification. J Inf Sci. 2018;44(1):28–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A. Biomedical text categorization based on ensemble pruning and optimized topic modelling. Comput Math Methods Med. 2018;2018:2497471. doi:10.1155/2018/2497471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A.. Consensus clustering-based undersampling approach to imbalanced learning. Scientific Programming. 2019;2019:5901087. doi:10.1155/2019/5901087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A. Two-stage topic extraction model for bibliometric data analysis based on word embeddings and clustering. IEEE Access. 2019;7:145614–145633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A. Topic-enriched word embeddings for sarcasm identification. In: Silhavy R, editor. Software Engineering Methods in Intelligent Algorithms. CSOC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Vol. 984. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 293–304. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19807-7_29.
   Google Scholar
• Onan A. Mining opinions from instructor evaluation reviews: a deep learning approach. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2020;28(1):117–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A. Sentiment analysis on product reviews based on weighted word embeddings and deep neural networks. Concurr Comp Pract Exp. 2021;33(23):e5909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A. Sentiment analysis on massive open online course evaluations: a text mining and deep learning approach. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2021;29(3):572–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A, Toçoğlu MA. A term weighted neural language model and stacked bidirectional LSTM based framework for sarcasm identification. IEEE Access. 2021;9:7701–7722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onan A. Bidirectional convolutional recurrent neural network architecture with group-wise enhancement mechanism for text sentiment classification. J King Saud Uni Comput Inf Sci. 2022;34(5):2098–2117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisa Z, Nova M. This AI can see the forest and the trees. IEEE Spectr. 2020;57(8):32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaishya R, Javaid M, Khan IH, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2020;14(4):337–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway-Brown J, Helmstedt KJ, Mengersen KL. Interpolating missing land cover data using stochastic spatial random forests for improved change detection. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 2021;7:649–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries GRW, Huettmann F. Machine learning in wildlife biology: algorithms, data issues and availability, workflows, citizen science, code sharing, metadata and a brief historical perspective. In: Humphries G, Magness D, Huettmann F, editors. Machine learning for ecology and sustainable natural resource management. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 3–26. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96978-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer J. Migratory shorebird ecology in the Hunter estuary, sourth-eastern Australia; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Carney M, Webster B, Alvarado I, et al. Teachable machine: approachable web-based tool for exploring machine learning classification. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2020 Apr. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen T, Jormanainen I, Kahila J, et al. Co-designing machine learning apps in k–12 with primary school children. In: 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). IEEE; 2020 Jul. p. 308–310.
   Google Scholar
• Kacorri H. Teachable machines for accessibility. ACM SIGACCESS Access Comput. 2017;119:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Xu S, Zhu Q. Seabird image identification in natural scenes using Grabcut and combined features. Ecol Inform. 2016;33:24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanbori J, Duan W, Shaw E, et al. Classification of bird species from video using appearance and motion features. Ecol Inform. 2018;48:12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. Country profile: Malaysia; 2020. [cited 2020 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/country/malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Fadzly N, Zuharah WF, Jenn Ney JW. Can plants fool artificial intelligence? Using machine learning to compare between bee orchids and bees. Plant Signal Behav. 2021;16(10):1935605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chollet F. Deep learning with python. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Boarman WI. A field guide to the birds of West Malaysia and Singapore. Condor. 2003;105(1):169.
   Google Scholar
• Wäldchen J, Mäder P. Machine learning for image based species identification. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9(11):2216–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger S, Rollins M, Tietz A, et al. Inaturalist as an engaging tool for identifying organisms in outdoor activities. J Biol Educ. 2020;55(5):537–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard E. Introduction to machine learning. Champaign (IL): Wolfram Media Publishing; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan BL, Wood CL, Iliff MJ, et al. Ebird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(10):2282–2292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causey D, Padula VM. The pelecaniform birds. Encycl Ocean Sci. 2013;4:2128–2136.
   Google Scholar
• BioExplorer.net. Order Charadriiformes / Shorebirds. Bio Explorer. [cited 2021 July 12]. Available from: https://www.bioexplorer.net/order-charadriiformes/.
   Google Scholar
• Yeok FS, Aik YC, Butt C. A pilot rapid assessment of selected ecosystem services provided by the Teluk Air Tawar-Kuala Muda coast IBA in Pulau Pinang; 2016. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.24060.33927.
   Google Scholar
• Razak N. Shorebird Abundance and Species Richness in Penang Island; 2020. 615–628. doi:10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.02.56.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen BD, Fuller RA, Watkins D, et al. Revision of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway population estimates for 37 listed migratory shorebird species. Unpublished report for the Department of the Environment. BirdLife Australia, Melbourne. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant J, Hayman P, Prater T. Shorebirds. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao K, Engstrom L, Ilyas A, et al. Noise or signal: The role of image backgrounds in object recognition; 2020. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.09994.
   Google Scholar
• Sagawa S, Koh PW, Hashimoto TB, et al. Distributionally robust neural networks for group shifts: On the importance of regularization for worst-case generalization; 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.08731.
   Google Scholar
• Jo J, Bengio Y. Measuring the tendency of CNNs to learn surface statistical regularities. 2017. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11561.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen JH, Behrmann J, Zemel R, et al. Excessive invariance causes adversarial vulnerability. 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00401.
   Google Scholar
• Jetley S, Lord NA, Torr PH. With friends like these, who needs adversaries? 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04200.
   Google Scholar
• Ferns PN. Plumage colour and pattern in waders. Bull-Wader Study Group. 2003;100:122–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lau WL, Li ZL, Lam KK. Effects of JPEG compression on image classification. Int J Remote Sens. 2003;24(7):1535–1544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeland M, Rzanny M, Alaqraa N, et al. Plant species classification using flower images—a comparative study of local feature representations. PloS One. 2017;12(2):e0170629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak MA, Norouzzadeh MS, Wolfson DW, et al. Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: applications in ecology. Methods Ecol Evol. 2019;10(4):585–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Forstmeier W, Ihle M, et al. Irreproducible text-book “knowledge”: the effects of color bands on zebra finch fitness. Evolution. 2018;72(4):961–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar