Preliminary Evaluation of Cloud Fraction Simulations by GAMIL2 Using COSP

References

• Bodas-Salcedo, A., M. J. Webb, S. Bony, et al., 2011: COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment, Bull. Amer. Me-teor. Soc., 92(8), 1023–1043.
   Google Scholar
• Chepfer, H., S. Bony, D. Winker, et al., 2010: The GCM-Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO-GOCCP), J. Geophys. Res., 115, DOOH16, doi: 10.1029/2009JD012251.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, W. D., J. J. Hack, B. A. Boville, et al., 2003: Description of the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model (CAM2), NCAR, Boulder, 190pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gleckler, P. J., K. E. Taylor, and C. Doutriaux, 2008: Performance metrics for climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D06104, doi: 10.1029/2007JDO08972.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, J. M., R. Marchand, Z. Luo, et al., 2007: A multipurpose radar simulation package: QuickBeam, Bull. Amer. Meteor Soc., 88(11), 1723–1727.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, B. R., 2011: Evaluating Clouds in Global Climate Models Using Instrument Simulators, M.S. thesis, University of Wash-ington, 93pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. E., B. R. Hillman, S. A. Klein, et al., 2012: Exposing global cloud biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) using satellite observations and their corresponding instrument simulators, J. Climate, in press, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00469.1.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. D., W. P. Menzel, Y. J. Kaufman, et al., 2003: Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41(2), 442–458.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. A., and C. Jakob, 1999: Validation and sensitivities of frontal clouds simulated by the ECMWF model, Mon. Wea. Rev, 127, 2514–2531.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L.-J., and B. Wang, 2010: Influences of two convective schemes on the radiative energy budget in GAMIL1.0, Acta Meteor Sinica, 24(3), 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L.-J., X. Xie, B. Wang, et al., 2012: Evaluating the performances of GAMIL 1.0 and GAMIL2.0 during TWP-ICE with CAPT, Atmos. Oceanic Sci. Lett., 5, 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W. Y., and M. H. Zhang, 2004: Evaluation of clouds and their radiative effects simulated by the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model CAM2 against satellite observations, J. Climate, 17, 3302–3318.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, R., and T. Ackerman, 2010: An analysis of cloud cover in multiscale modeling framework global climate model simulations using 4 and 1 km horizontal grids, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D16207, doi: 10.1029/2009JDO13423.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, H., and A. Gettelman, 2008: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests, J. Climate, 21(15), 3642–3659.
   Google Scholar
• Pincus, R., S. Platnick, S. A. Ackerman, et al., 2012: Reconciling simulated and observed views of clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the limits of instrument simulators, J. Climate, in press, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00267.1.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, D. A., R. A. Wood, S. Bony, et al., 2007: Climate models and their evaluation, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon et al. (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 996pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, P. J., and J. E. Kristjánsson, 1998: A comparison of the CCM3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations, J. Climate, 11(7), 1587–1614.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, N. A., D. E. Parker, E. B. Horton, et al., 2003: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D14), 4407, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002670.
   Google Scholar
• Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, 1999: Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP, Bull. Amer Meteor. Soc., 80,2261–2287.
   Google Scholar
• Rossow, W. B., A. W. Walker, D. E. Beuschel, et al., 1996: International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISccp) Documentation of New Cloud Datasets, WMO/TD-No. 737, World Meteorological Organization, 115pp.
   Google Scholar
• Slingo, J. M., 1987: The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor Soc., 113,899–927.
   Google Scholar
• Tannahill, J., S. T. Brandon, C. C. Covey, et al., 2010: The Climate Uncertainty Quantification Project at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: I. Initial Analysis of the Sensitivities and Un-certainties in the Community Atmosphere Model, in: AGU fall meeting 2010, American Geophysical Union.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. E., 2001: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D7), 7183–7192, doi: 10.1029/2000JD900719.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. E., D. Williamson, and F. Zwiers, 2000: The sea surface temperature and sea-ice concentration boundary conditions for AMIP II simulations, PCMDI Report No. 60, Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, Lawrence Liver-more National Laboratory, Livermore, California, 25pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B., H. Wan, J. Ji, et al., 2004: Design of a new dynamical core for global atmospheric models based on some efficient numerical methods, Sci. China Ser. A-Math., 47,4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, M. J., C. Senior, S. Bony, et al., 2001: Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models, Climate Dyn., 17(12), 905–922.
   Google Scholar
• Winker, D. M., J. Pelon, J. A. Coakley, et al., 2010: The CALIPSO mission: A global 3D view of aerosols and clouds, Bull. Amer Meteor. Soc., 91,1211–1229.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, K. M., and S. K. Krueger, 1991: Evaluation of cloudiness parameterizations using a cumulus ensemble model, Mon. Wea. Rev, 119,342–367.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Y. Qian, G Lin, et al., 2011: Some issues in uncertainty quantification and parameter tuning: A case study of convective parameterization scheme in the WRF regional climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11,31769–31817.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, R., 1994: A two-step shape-preserving advection scheme, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 11(4), 479–490.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., M. Doutriaux, G Seze, et al., 1996: A methodology study of the validation of clouds in GCMs using ISCCP satellite observations, Climate Dyn., 12,389–401.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G J., and N. A. McFarlane, 1995: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre general circulation model, Atmos.—Ocean, 33,407–446.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G J., and M. Mu, 2005: Effects of modifications to the Zhang-McFarlane convection parameterization on the simulation of the tropical precipitation in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, version 3, J. Geo-phys. Res., 110, D09109, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005617.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. H., W. Y. Lin, S. A. Klein, et al., 2005: Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements, J. Geophy. Res., 110, D15502, doi: 10.1029/2004JDO05021.
   Google Scholar