10
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparing with Relative Accuracy Two Independent Ordinal Samples

&
Pages 185-198 | Received 01 Jul 2007, Accepted 01 Jan 2008, Published online: 09 Feb 2016

References

  • Aitchison, J. and Silvey, S. D. (1957). The generalization of probit analysis to the case of multiple response. Biometrika, 44, 131–140.
  • Bhat, C. R. and Pulugurta, V. (1998). A comparison of two alternative behavioral choice mechanisms for household auto ownership decisions. Transportation Research, Series B, 32, 61–75.
  • Van Beek, K. W. H, Koopmans, C. C. and van Praag, B. M. S. (1997). Shopping the labour market: a real tale of fiction. European Economic Review, 41, 295–317.
  • Chang, F. M., Chen, L. and Chen, Y. (in press). Approximate distribution of demerit statistic — a bounding approach. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis.
  • Chen, L. (2005). A demerit control chart with linguistic weights. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16, 349–359.
  • Chimka, J. R. and Cabrera, P. V. (2006). New demerit control limits for poisson distributed defects. Quality Engineering, 18(4), 461–467.
  • Chimka, J. R. and Cabrera, P. V. (2007). Type II errors of demerit control charts. Quality Engineering, 19(3), 461–467.
  • Franceschini, F., Galetto, M. and Varetto, M. (2004). Qualitative ordinal scales: the concept of ordinal range. Quality Engineering, 16(4), 515–524.
  • Franceschini, F. and Romano, D. (1999). Control chart for linguistic variables: a method based on the use of linguistic qualifiers. International Journal of Production Research, 37(16), 3791–3801.
  • Greene, W. H. (1997). Econometric Analysis (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  • Jones, L. A., Woodall, W. H. and Conerly, M. D. (1999). Exact properties of demerit control charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 31(2), 207–216.
  • Kanagawa, A., Tamaki, F. and Ohta, H. (1993). Control charts for process average and variability based on linguistic data. International Journal of Production Research, 31(4), 913–922.
  • Labovitz, S. (1970). The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. American Sociological Review, 35, 515–524.
  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
  • Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (1998). The dominance of institutions in interest representation: a test of seven explanations. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 231–255.
  • Mann, H. B. and Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60.
  • Mannering, F., Kim, S., Ng, L. and Barfield, W. (1995). Travelers’ preferences for in-vehicle information systems: an exploratory analysis. Transportation Research, Series C, 3, 339–351.
  • McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42, 109–142.
  • McKelvey, R. D. and Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.
  • Mixon, Jr., F. G. and Mixon, D. C. (1996). The economics of illegitimate activities: further evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics, 25, 373–381.
  • Nembhard, D. A. and Nembhard, H. B. (2000). A demerits control chart for autocorrelated data. Quality Engineering, 13(2), 179–190.
  • Senese, P. D. (1997). Between dispute and war: the effect of joint democracy on interstate conflict escalation. The Journal of Politics, 59, 1–27.
  • Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.
  • Student (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6, 1–25.
  • Vella, F. (1994). Gender roles and human capital investment: the relationship between traditional attitudes and female labour market performance. Economica, 61, 191–211.
  • Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1, 80–83.
  • Wilson, T. P. (1971). Critique of ordinal variables. Social Forces, 49, 432–444.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.