Integrated beta model for bathtub-shaped hazard rate data

References

• Aarset, M. V. (1987). How to identify bathtub hazard rate. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 36, 106–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinsete, A., Famoye, F., & Lee, C. (2008). The beta-Pareto distribution. Statistics, 42, 547–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almalki, S. J., & Nadarajah, S. (2014). A new discrete modified Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 63, 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, M., Lai, C. D., Wellington, M., & Zitikis, R. (2012). The discrete additive Weibull distribution: A bathtub-shaped hazard for discontinuous failure data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 106, 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro, G. M., Ortega, E. M. M., & Silva, G. O. (2012). The beta extended Weibull family. Journal of Probability and Statistical Science, 10, 15–40.
   Google Scholar
• Domma, F., & Condino, F. (2014). A new class of distribution functions for life time data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 129, 36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, X.-F., Zhang, L.-Y., & Li, F.-Q. (2013). Estimation of reliability for exponential distributions using ranked set sampling with unequal samples. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 10, 319–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eugene, N., Lee, C., & Famoye, F. (2002). Beta-normal distribution and its applications. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 31, 497–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, T. H., Hsu, T. M., & Peng, K. J. (2013). Bayesian inference of a series system on Weibull step-stress accelerated life tests with dependent masking. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 10, 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. L., & Gupta, R. C. (2000). The monotoni city of there liability measures of beta distribution. Applied Mathematics Letters, 13, 5–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, R. (2013). A new bathtub curve model with a finite support. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 119, 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. C. (2009). Kumaraswamy’s distribution: A beta-type distribution with some tractability advantages. Statistical Methodology, 6, 70–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, P. (1980). A generalized probability density-function for double-bounded random-processes. Journal of Hydrology, 46, 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosznik-Biernacka, S. (2007). Makehams generalised distribution. Computational Methods in Science and Technology, 13, 113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C. D. (2013). Issues concerning constructions of discrete life time models. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 10, 251–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. D., & Jones, G. (2014). Beta hazard rate distribution and applications. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 64, 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. D., & Mukherjee, S. P. (1986). A note on ‘A finite-range of failure times’. Microelectronics and Reliability, 26, 183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. D., & Xie, M. (2006). Stochastic ageing and dependence for reliability. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C. D., Xie, M., & Murthy, D. N. P. (2003). A modified Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 52, 33–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemonte, A. J. (2013). A new exponential-type distribution with constant, decreasing, increasing, upside-down bathtub and bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 62, 149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, E. (2011). The beta generalized Pareto distribution with application to life time data. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 81, 2414–2430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker, W. Q., & Escobar, L. A. (1998). Statistical methods for reliability data. NewYork: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mudholkar, G. S., & Srivastava, D. K. (1993). Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failure-rate data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 42, 299–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S. P., & Islam, A. (1983). A finite-range distribution of failure times. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 30, 487–491.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, S., & Kotz, S. (2003). Moments of some J-shaped distributions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 30, 311–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noughabi, M. S., Roknabadi, A. H. R., & Borzadaran, G. R. M. (2013). Some discrete life time distributions with bathtub-shaped hazard rate functions. Quality Engineering, 25, 225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, X., & Yan, Z. (2014). Estimation and application for a new extended Weibull distribution. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 121, 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, W. J. (2011). A flexible parametric survival model which allows a bathtub shaped hazard rate function. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38, 1665–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhan, A. M., & Apaloo, J. (2013). Exponentiated modified Weibull extension distribution. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 112, 137–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teimouri, M., Hosseini, S. M., & Nadarajah, S. (2013). Ratios of Birnbaum–Saunders random variables. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 10, 455–479.
   Google Scholar
• Topp, C. W., & Leone, F. C. (1955). A family of J-shaped frequency functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 209–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, M., & Lai, C. D. (1996). Reliability analysis using an additive Weibull model with bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 52, 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, M., Tang, Y., & Goh, T. N. (2002). A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 76, 279–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar