A novel fuzzy quality function deployment framework

References

• Ayağ, Z., & Özdemir, R. G. (2012). Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 630–636.10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu, A., Kaplanoğlu, V., Durmuşoğlu, Z. D. U., & Şahin, C. (2013). Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 899–907.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, A., Geraghty, J., & Young, P. (2010). Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment. Applied Soft Computing, 10, 1013–1027.10.1016/j.asoc.2010.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 3000–3011.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., Kao, H. P., & Wu, M. L. (1999). Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37, 2499–2518.10.1080/002075499190635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, P. C., & Wang, Y. W. (2006). Fuzzy Delphi and back-propagation model for sales forecasting in PCB industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 30, 715–726.10.1016/j.eswa.2005.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, P. -L., Hsu, C. -W., & Chang, P. -C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 14172–14179.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F.-H., Hsu, T. -S., & Tzeng, G. -H. (2011). A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 908–932.10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. H. (2001). Indexes of competitive power and core competence in selecting Asia-Pacific ports. Journal of Chinese Institute of Transportation, 13(1), 1–25 . in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Y. -C., Sun, C. -C., & Yen, H.-Y. (2012). Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Applied Soft Computing, 12, 64–71.10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S.-H., Lee, A. H. I., & Pearn, W. L. (2005). Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics, 96, 15–36.10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzeng, R. J., & Wen, K. S. (2005). Evaluating project teaming strategies for construction of Taipei 101 using resource-based theory. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 483–491.10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Fung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., & Wang, D. (2002). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal of Production Research, 40, 585–599.10.1080/00207540110061634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güngör, Z., Deliceb, E. K., & Kesenc, S. E. (2011). New product design using FDMS and FANP under fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 11, 3347–3356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W., He, T., Lee, C. K. M., & Emrouznejad, A. (2012). Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10841–10850.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, T. -Y. (2006). Establish standards of standard costing with the application of convergent gray zone test. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 593–611.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jassbi, J., Mohamadnejad, F., & Nasrollahzadeh, H. (2011). A fuzzy DEMATEL framework for modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 5967–5973.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng, D. J. -F. & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Social influence on the use of clinical decision support systems: Revisiting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62, 819–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Büyüközkan, G. (2006). A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 171, 390–411.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamvysi, K., Gotzamani, K., Andronikidis, A., & Georgiou, A. C. (2014). Capturing and prioritizing students’ requirements for course design by embedding fuzzy-AHP and linear programming in QFD. European Journal of Operational Research, 237, 1083–1094.10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardaras, D. K., Karakostas, B., & Mamakou, X. J. (2013). Content presentation personalisation and media adaptation in tourism web sites using fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy Cognitive maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 2331–2342.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak, E. E., Sozer, S., & Alptekin, S. E. (2002). Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44, 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., Moskowitz, H., Dhingra, A., & Evans, G. (2000). Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 504–518.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00048-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2003). Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions, 35, 619–626.10.1080/07408170304355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Yang, C. Y., & Lin, C. Y. (2010). An evaluation framework for product planning using FANP, QFD and multi-choice goal programming. International Journal of Production Research, 48, 3977–3997.10.1080/00207540902950845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H. I., & Lin, C. Y. (2011). An integrated fuzzy QFD framework for new product development. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 23, 26–47.10.1007/s10696-011-9076-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H. I., Wang, W. M., & Lin, T. Y. (2010). An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Lin, C. Y., & Wu, H. W. (2013). Selecting candidate suppliers using a multiple criteria decision making model. Advanced Materials Research, 694-697, 3472–3475.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697
   Google Scholar
• Liao, C. -N., & Kao, H. -P. (2014). An evaluation approach to logistics service using fuzzy theory, quality function development and goal programming. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 68, 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. Y., Lee, A. H. I., & Kang, H.-Y. (2013). An integrated new product development framework– an application on green and low-carbon products. International Journal of Systems Science, 46, 733–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. C. (2009). An integrated framework for the development of radio frequency identification technology in the logistics and supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 832–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L.-Z., & Hsu, T.-H. (2011). Designing a model of FANP in brand image decision-making. Applied Soft Computing, 11, 561–573.10.1016/j.asoc.2009.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Chang, H. C. (2007). Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13, 243–249.10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., Shao, C., Ma, S., & Ye, Z. (2011). Constructing road safety performance indicators using fuzzy Delphi method and grey Delphi method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1509–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikaeil, R., Ozcelik, Y., Yousefi, R., Ataei, M., & Hosseini, S. M. (2013). Ranking the sawability of ornamental stone using fuzzy Delphi and multi-criteria decision-making techniques. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 58, 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, S. K., & Kant, R. (2014). A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain. Applied Soft Computing, 18, 126–135.10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasamy, N. R., & Selladurai, V. (2004). Fuzzy logic approach to prioritise engineering characteristics in quality function deployment (FL-QFD). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21, 1012–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sevkli, M., Oztekin, A., Uysal, O., Torlak, G., Turkyilmaz, A., & Delen, D. (2012). Development of a fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industry in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 14–24.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, X. X., Tan, K. C., & Xie, M. (2001). The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12, 65–75.10.1023/A:1008955630880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, S. Y., & Choi, I. S. (2001). Fuzzy QFD for supply chain management with reliability consideration. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72, 327–334.10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00022-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J., Fung, R. Y. K., & Xu, B. (2002). A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration. Computers and Operations Research, 29, 1447–1463.10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00041-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanegas, L. V. & Labib, A. W. (2001). A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. International Journal of Production Research, 39, 99–120.10.1080/00207540010005079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. M., Lee, A. H. I., & Chang, D.-T. (2010). An integrated FDM-ANP evaluation model for sustainable development of housing community. Optimization Letters, 4, 239–257.10.1007/s11590-009-0164-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Yeo, G. -T., & Ng, A. Y. (2014). Choosing optimal bunkering ports for liner shipping companies: A hybrid fuzzy-Delphi–TOPSIS approach. Transport Policy. Available online.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. -W. (2012). Segmenting critical factors for successful knowledge management implementation using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Applied Soft Computing, 12, 527–535.10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. L., & Tzeng, G. -H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1417–1424.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaim, S., Sevkli, M., Camgöz-Akdağ, H., Demirel, O. F., Yayla, A. Y., & Delen, D. (2014). Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 4464–4474.10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2010). Towards a QFD-based expert system: A novel extension to fuzzy QFD methodology using rough set theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 8888–8896.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar