Optimal definition of the limit of detection (LOD) in detecting genetically modified grains from heterogeneous grain lots

References

• Bliss, C. I., & Owen, A. R. G. (1958). Negative binomial distributions with a common k. Biometrika, 45, 37–58.10.1093/biomet/45.1-2.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corless, R. M., Gonnet, G. H., Hare, D. E. G., Jeffrey, D. J., & Knuth, D. E. (1996). On the Lambert W function. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 5, 329–359.10.1007/BF02124750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1989). Analysis of binary data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1950). Some theory of sampling. Toronto: General Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Emslie, K. R., Whaites, L., Griffiths, K. R., & Murby, E. J. (2007). Sampling plan and test protocol for the semiquantitative detection of genetically modified canola (Brassica napus) seed in bulk canola seed. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 4414–4421.10.1021/jf070267i
   Google Scholar
• Esbensen, K. H., Friis-Petersen, H. H., Petersen, L., Holm-Nielsen, J. B., & Mortensen, P. P. (2007). Representative process sampling – in practice: Variographic analysis and estimation of total sampling errors (TSE). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 88, 41–59.10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Esbensen, K. H., Paoletti, C., & Minkkinen, P. (2012a). Representative sampling of large kernel lots I. Theory of sampling and variographic analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 32, 154–164.10.1016/j.trac.2011.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Esbensen, K. H., Paoletti, C., & Minkkinen, P. (2012b). Representative sampling of large kernel lots III. General considerations on sampling heterogeneous foods. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 32, 178–184.10.1016/j.trac.2011.12.002
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2004). Commission recommendation of 4 October 2004 on technical guidance for sampling and detection of genetically modified organisms and material produced from genetically modified organisms as or in products in the context of Regulation (EC) No. 1830/2003. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:348:0018:0026:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1926). The arrangement of field experiments. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain, 33, 503–513.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1973). Statistical methods and scientific inference (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Hafner Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbeck, A., Binimelis, R., Defarge, N., Steinbrecher, R., Székács, A., Wickson, F., … Novotny, E. (2015). No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environmental Sciences Europe, 27, 1.10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst-Jensen, A. (2007). Sampling, detection, identification and quantification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In Y. Pico (Ed.), Food toxicants analysis. Techniques, strategies and developments (231–268). Amsterdam. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, W. (1982). Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulation of foods and drugs. Analytical Chemistry, 54, 67A–76A.10.1021/ac00238a765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R., & Bayarri, M. J. (2003). Confusion over measures of evidence (p’s) versus errors (α’s) in classical statistical testing. The American Statistician, 57, 171–178.10.1198/0003130031856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPPC. (2008). Methodologies for sampling of consignments (ISPM No. 31). Rome: International Plant Protection Convention, FAO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (1997). ISO 11843–1: Capability of detection – Part 1: Terms and definitions. Genève: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (1999). ISO 2859–1: Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes – part 1: Sampling schemes indexed by acceptance quality limit (AQL) for lot-by-lot inspection. Genève: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2005). ISO 13528: Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. Genève: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2006). ISO 24276: Foodstuffs – methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products – general requirements and definitions. Genève: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2009). ISO 24333: Cereals and cereal products – sampling. Genève: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Japanese Industrial Standards Committee. (1956). JIS Z 9002: Single sampling inspection plans having desired operation characteristics. Part 1. Sampling by attributes. Tokyo: Japanese Standards Association. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Kemp, A. W. (2005). Univariate discrete distrbutions (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/0471715816
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, B. D., & Levy, P. S. (1997). A look at the rule of three. American Statistician, 51, 137–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama, T., Kasahara, M., Minegishi, Y., Futo, S., Sawada, C., Watai, M., … Hino, A (2011). Qualitative PCR method for roundup ready soybean: Interlaboratory study. Journal of AOAC International, 94, 224–231.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., & Cui, L. (2013). A design of attributes single sampling plans for three-class products. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 10, 369–387.10.1080/16843703.2013.11673421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarthur, R., & von Holst, C. (2012). A protocol for the validation of qualitative methods of detection. Analytical Methods, 4, 2744–2754.10.1039/c2ay05719 k
   Google Scholar
• Macarthur, R., Murray, A. W., Allnutt, T. R., Deppe, C., Hird, H. J., Kerins, G. M., … Hugo, S. (2007). Model for tuning GMO detection in seed and grain. Nature Biotechnology, 25, 169–170.10.1038/nbt0207-169
   Google Scholar
• Mano, J., Harada, M., Takabatake, R., Furui, S., Kitta, K., Nakamura, K., … Futo, S. (2012). Comprehensive GMO detection using real-time PCR array: Single-laboratory validation. Journal of AOAC International, 95, 508–516.10.5740/jaoacint.11-388
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, C. E., Searle, S. R., & Neuhans, J. M. (2008). Generalized, linear, and mixed models (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries. (2007). Operating procedure for the inspection about genetically modified organisms. Annex 1: Detection procedure of GM corn (CBH351) in maize seeds for planting. (in Japanese). Retrieved from www.nias.affrc.go.jp/gmo/doc/notification_maff_190405.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare. (2001). Inspection method of food using genetically modified organisms, Notification No. 110, Annex. Tokyo: Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Minkkinen, P., Esbensen, K. H., & Paoletti, C. (2012). Representative sampling of large kernel lots II. Application to soybean sampling for GMO control. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 32, 165–177.10.1016/j.trac.2011.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20, 175–240.
   Google Scholar
• Onori, R., & De Giacomo, M. (2010). Seeds: Transgenes and genetic modification (GM). In D. R. Heldman, D. G. Hoover, & M. B. Wheeler (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biotechnology in agriculture and food (587–590). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. 10.1081/E-EBAF
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, C., Donatelli, M., Kay, S., & Van Den Eede, G. (2003). Simulating kernel lot sampling: The effect of heterogeneity on the detection of GMO contaminations. Seed Science and Technology, 31, 629–638.10.15258/sst
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, C., Heissenberger, A., Mazzara, M., Larcher, S., Grazioli, E., Corbisier, P., … Moran, G. (2006). Kernel lot distribution assessment (KeLDA): A study on the distribution of GMO in large soybean shipments. European Food Research and Technology, 224, 129–139.10.1007/s00217-006-0299-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, A., & Gupta, V. B. (2011). Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chronicles of Young Scientists, 2, 21–25.10.4103/2229-5186.79345
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. R. (1961). Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, 189, 732–735.10.1038/189732a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. R. (1984). Assessing and interpreting the spatial distribution of insect populations. Annual Review of Entomology, 29, 321–357.10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA Federal Grain Inspection Service. (2001). GIPSA directive 9181.1 (2-26-01), Testing for StarLink™ corn – lateral flow test strip method. Washington, DC: USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Wehling, P., LaBudde, R. A., Brunelle, S. L., & Nelson, M. T. (2011). Probability of detection (POD) as a statistical model for the validation of qualitative methods. Journal of AOAC International, 94, 335–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamura, K. (2000). Colony expansion model for describing the spatial distribution of populations. Population Ecology, 42, 161–169.10.1007/PL00011995
   Google Scholar
• Yamamura, K., & Ishimoto, M. (2009). Optimal sample size for composite sampling with subsampling, when estimating the proportion of pecky rice grains in a field. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 135–153.10.1198/jabes.2009.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamura, K., & Sugimoto, T. (1995). Estimation of the pest prevention ability of the import plant quarantine in Japan. Biometrics, 51, 482–490.10.2307/2532936
   Google Scholar
• Yamamura, K., Katsumata, H., Yoshioka, J., Yuda, T., & Kasugai, K. (2016). Sampling inspection to prevent the invasion of alien pests: Statistical theory of import plant quarantine systems in Japan. Population Ecology, 58, 63–80.10.1007/s10144-015-0521-2
   Google Scholar
• Zeger, S. L., Liang, K.-Y., & Albert, P. S. (1988). Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics, 44, 1049–1060.10.2307/2531734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar