Determining optimal process mean and quality improvement in a profit-maximization supply chain model

References

• Abdul-Kader, W., Ganjavi, O., & Solaiman, A. (2010). An integrated model for optimisation of production and quality costs. International Journal of Production Research, 48, 7357–7370.10.1080/00207540903382881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., & Burton, J. S. (1994). Coordinated vs. independent inventory replenishment a vendor and multiple buyers. International Journal of Production Economics, 35, 215–222.10.1016/0925-5273(94)90084-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyles, R. A. (1994). Brocess capability with asymmetric tolerances. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 23, 615–635.10.1080/03610919408813190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. M., & Taguchi, S. (1986). The Taguchi approach to parameter design. Paper presented at the ASQC Quality Congress Transactions, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H. & Chou, C.-Y. (2003). Determining the optimum manufacturing target based on an asymmetric quality loss function. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21, 193–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., & Chou, C.-Y. (2017). Optimum process mean, standard deviation and specification limits settings under the Burr distribution. Engineering Computations, 34, 66–76.10.1108/EC-10-2015-0321
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H. & Khoo, M. B. C. (2009). Optimum process mean and manufacturing quantity settings for serial production system under the quality loss and rectifying inspection plan. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 1080–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., & Lai, M.-T. (2007). Economic manufacturing quantity, optimum process mean, and economic specification limits setting under the rectifying inspection plan. European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 336–344.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H. & Lu, C.-L. (2011). Optimum profit model considering production, quality and sale problem. International Journal of Systems Science, 42, 1917–1933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., & Tsai, W.-R. (2016). Modified single-vendor single-buyer supply chain model with quality loss for product. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33, 495–500.10.1080/21681015.2015.1136703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. S., & Pearn, W. L. (2001). Capability indices for processes with asymmetric tolerances. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 24, 559–568.10.1080/02533839.2001.9670652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, B.-W. (1995). Optimization of mechanical assembly tolerances by incorporating Taguchi’s quality loss function. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 14, 264–276.10.1016/0278-6125(95)98879-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. W., & Mao, H. (2011). The economic design of multivariate MSE control chart. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 8, 75–85.10.1007/s11135-009-9291-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, J.-Y., Tsai, T.-R., Lio, Y. L., Lu, W., & Shi, D. (2015). An integrated approach for the optimization of tolerance design and quality cost. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 186–192.10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-Y., & Chang, C.-L. (2001). Minimum-loss assembly tolerance allocation by considering product degradation and time value of money. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 17, 139–146.10.1007/s001700170202
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C. Y., Liang, W. H., & Chang, C. L. (2000). A study on the present worth of bivariate quality loss. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 23, 251–258.10.1080/02533839.2000.9670544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwish, M. A. (2009). Economic selection of process mean for single-vendor single-buyer supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 162–169.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, C., Scanlan, J., Marsh, R., & Wiseall, S. (2015). Improving profitability of optimal mean setting with multiple feature means for dual quality characteristics. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81, 1767–1780.10.1007/s00170-015-7254-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Q., & Kapur, K. C. (2006). Economic development of specifications for 100% inspection based on asymmetric quality loss functions. IIE Transactions, 38, 659–669.10.1080/07408170600692226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganeshan, R., Kulkarni, S., & Boone, T. (2001). Production economics and process quality: A Taguchi perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 71, 343–350.10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00130-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, D., & Kim, S.-L. (1997). Implementation of JIT purchasing: An integrated approach. Production Planning & Control, 8, 152–157.10.1080/095372897235415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.-C., & Liu, Y.-T. (2010). Quality investment and inspection policy in a supplier–manufacturer supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 717–729.10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J.-T., & Hsu, L.-F. (2013). An integrated vendor–buyer cooperative inventory model in an imperfect production process with shortage backordering. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 65, 493–505.10.1007/s00170-012-4188-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeang, A. (1997). An approach of tolerance design for quality improvement and cost reduction. International Journal of Production Research, 35, 1193–1211.10.1080/002075497195272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeang, A. (2009). Optimal parameters design and maintenance interval for a product with quality and cost considerations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223, 737–750.10.1243/09544054JEM1350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeang, A. (2012). Simultaneous determination of production lot size and process parameters under process deterioration and process breakdown. Omega, 40, 774–781.10.1016/j.omega.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeang, A. (2013). Concurrent product and process parameters determination under deterioration process. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, 9132–9141.10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-L., & Ha, D. (2003). A JIT lot-splitting model for supply chain management: Enhancing buyer–supplier linkage. International Journal of Production Economics, 86, 1–10.10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, S. S., & Prybutok, V. (2004). Process investment and loss functions: Models and analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 120–129.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00147-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M.-H. C. (2005). A general model for process-setting with an asymmetrical linear loss function. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26, 1317–1322.10.1007/s00170-004-2117-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian, Z., Vanli, A., & del Castillo, E. (2014). Setup adjustment for asymmetric cost functions under unknown process parameters. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 11, 471–489.10.1080/16843703.2014.11673358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, S.-L., & Huang, C.-J. (2017). Statistically constrained economic design of maximum double EWMA control charts based on loss functions. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 14, 280–295.10.1080/16843703.2016.1208940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghsoodloo, S., & Li, M.-H. C. (2000). Optimal asymmetric tolerance design. IIE Transactions, 32, 1127–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, L.-Y., Chuang, C.-J., Ho, C.-H., & Wu, C.-W. (2014). An integrated inventory model with quality improvement and two-part credit policy. TOP, 22, 1042–1061.10.1007/s11750-013-0311-y
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, L.-Y., Chang, C.-T., & Shum, P. (2012). The EOQ with defective items and partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity derived algebraically. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20, 141–160.10.1007/s10100-010-0160-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakitzis, A. C., & Antzoulakos, D. L. (2016). Run sum control charts for the monitoring of process variability. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 13, 58–77.10.1080/16843703.2016.1139842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, S. A., & Turiac, M. (2016). Joint optimal determination of process mean, production quantity, pricing, and market segmentation with demand leakage. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 312–326.10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaibu, A.-B., & Cho, B. R. (2006). Development of realistic quality loss functions for industrial applications. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 15, 385–398.10.1007/s11518-006-6048-5
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, G., & Clausing, D. (1990). Robust quality. Harvard Business Review, 68, 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsou, J.-C. (2007). Economic order quantity model and Taguchi’s cost of poor quality. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31, 283–291.10.1016/j.apm.2005.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsou, J.-C., Hejazi, S. R., & Barzoki, M. R. (2012). Economic production quantity model for items with continuous quality characteristic, rework and reject. International Journal of Systems Science, 43, 2261–2267.10.1080/00207721.2011.569769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, S. (1998). Optimal strategy for the integrated vendor–buyer inventory model. European Journal of Operational Research, 105, 38–42.10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R.-F., Fu, X., Yuan, J.-C., & Dong, Z.-Y. (2018). Economic design of variable-parameter X-Shewhart control chart used to monitor continuous production. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 15, 106–124.10.1080/16843703.2017.1304037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. C., & Tang, G. R. (1998). Tolerance design for products with asymmetric quality losses. International Journal of Production Research, 36, 2529–2541.10.1080/002075498192670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar