Template-based Geometric Transformations of a Functionally Enriched DMU into FE Assembly Models

REFERENCES

• Albers, A.; Braun, A.; Clarkson, P. J.; Enkler, H.-G.; and D. Wynn: Contact and channel modeling to support early design of technical systems, Proc. Int. Conf., ICED’09, August, Stanford, USA, 2009, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Albers, A.; Burkardt, N.; Ohmer, M.: Contact and Channel Model for Pairs of Working Surfaces, In ElMaraghy, H. A., ElMaraghy, W. H. (Eds), London: Springer, Advances in Design, 2006, 511–520, DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-210-1_42.
   Google Scholar
• Andujar, C.; Brunet, P.; Ayala, D.: Topology-reducing surface simplification using a discrete solid representation, ACM Trans. Graph., 21(2), 2002, DOI: 10.1145/508357.508359. doi: 10.1145/508357.508359
   Google Scholar
• ANR ROMMA project: http://romma.lmt.ens-cachan.fr/.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C.G.; Bridgett, S.J.; Donaghy, R.J.; McCune, R.W.; McKeag, R.M.; D.J. Robinson: Techniques for interactive and automatic idealisation of CAD models, Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Field Simulations, 643–662, London, UK, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C.G.; Monaghan, D.J.; Price, M.A.; Ou, H.; Lamont, J.: Integrating CAE concepts with CAD geometry, In Engineering Computational Technology, 75–104, Saxe-Coburg Publications, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Barbau, R.; Krima, S.; Rachuri, S.; Narayanan, A.; Fiorentini, X.; Foufou, S.; Sriram, R. D.: OntoSTEP: Enriching product model data using ontologies, Computer-Aided Design, 44(6), 2012, 575–590, DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.01.008. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, J.H: Introduction to the Design and Behavior of Bolted Joints, Fourth Edition, CRC Press, 2007, DOI:10.1201/9780849381874. fmatt.
   Google Scholar
• Boussuge, F.; Léon, J-C.; Hahmann, S.; Fine, L.: An analysis of DMU transformation requirements for structural assembly simulations; Int. Conf. ECT 2012, Dubrovnic; 4–7 Sept.,2012.
   Google Scholar
• Choudria, R.; Véron, P.: Identifying and re-meshing contact interfaces in a polyhedral assembly for digital mock-up, Engineering with Computers, 22(1), 2006, 47–58, DOI: 10.1007/s00366-006-0029-7 doi: 10.1007/s00366-006-0029-7
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B.W.; Hanks, B.W.; Ernst, C.D.: Conformal Assembly Meshing with Tolerant Imprinting; Proc. of the 17th International Meshing Roundtable; 2008, 267–280, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87921-3_16
   Google Scholar
• Champaney, L.: A domain decomposition method for studying the effects of missing fasteners on the behavior of structural assemblies with contact and friction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, (2011), DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2011.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Champaney, L.; Boucard P-A.; Guinard S.: Adaptive multi-analysis strategy for contact problems with friction. Computational Mechanics, 42(2), 2007, DOI: 10.1007/s00466-007-0213-7.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C.B.; Pinfold, M.: Design engineering – a need to rethink the solution using knowledge based engineering, Knowledge-based systems; 12, 1999, 257–267. doi: 10.1016/S0950-7051(99)00013-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, A.; Shah, J. J.: Assembly Feature Tutor and Recognition Algorithms Based on Mating Face Pairs, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 7(3), 2010, 319–333, DOI: 10.3722/cadaps.2010.319-333. doi: 10.3722/cadaps.2010.319-333
   Google Scholar
• Fine, L; Léon, J-C.: A new approach to the Preparation of models for F.E. analyses, Int. Journal of Comp. Appl. in Technology, 23(2, 3, 4), 2005, 166–184, DOI: 10.1504/IJCAT.2005.006485.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentini, X.; Gambino, I.; Liang, V-C.; Rachuri, S.; Mani, M.; Bock, C.: An Ontology for Assembly Representation, National Institute of Standards and Technology NISTIR 7436, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA, July, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S.; Kannengiesser, U.: The situated function-behaviour, Design Studies, 25, 2004, 373–391. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S.: Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design, AI Magazine, 11 (4), 1990, 26–36. doi: 10.1109/62.63160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, I.; Pulles, J. P. W.; Bremer, A. P.; Vergeest, J. S. M.: Towards an ontology-based definition of design features, Proc. SIAM Workshop on mathematical foundations for features in computer aided design, engineering, and manufacturing, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• ISO TC184-SC4: ISO-10303 Part 203 - Application Protocol: Configuration controlled 3D design of mechanical parts and assemblies, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• ISO TC184-SC4: ISO-10303 Part 214 - Application Protocol: Core data for automotive mechanical design processes, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K.-Y.; Manley, D. G.; Yang, H.: Ontology-based assembly design and information sharing for collaborative product development, Computer-Aided Design, 38(12), 2006, 1233–1250, DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2006.08.004. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2006.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.; Lee, K.; Hong, T.; Kim, M.; Jung, M.; Song, Y: An integrated approach to realize multi-resolution of b-rep model. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on solid and physical modeling. SPM’05, 2005, DOI: 10.1145/1060244.1060262.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K-Y.; Wang, Y.; Muogboh, O. S.; Nnaji, B. O.: Design formalism for collaborative assembly design, Computer-Aided Design, 36(9), 2004, 849–871, DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2003.09.011. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2003.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura, Y.; Mizoguchi, R.: Ontology-based systematization of functional knowledge, J Eng. Design, 15(4), 2004, 327–351, DOI: 10.1080/09544820410001697163. doi: 10.1080/09544820410001697163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rocca, G: Knwledge based engineering: between AI and CAD. Review of a language based technology to support engineering design, Advanced engineering informatics; 26, 2012, 159–179. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, R.; Pernot, J-P.; Mikchevitch, A.; Véron, P.: Merging enriched Finite Element triangle meshes for fast prototyping of alternate solutions in the context of industrial maintenance; Computer-Aided Design; 42(8), 2010, 670–681, DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2010.01.002. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Quadros, W.R.; Vyas, V.; Brewer, M.; Owen, S.J.; Shimada, K.: A computational framework for automating generation of sizing function assembly meshing via disconnected skeletons; Engineering with Computers, 26(3); 2010, 231–247, DOI: 10.1007/3-540-29090-7_4. doi: 10.1007/s00366-009-0164-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani, K.; Thomson, V.: Ontology based interface design and control methodology for collaborative product development, Computer-Aided Design, 44(5), 2012, 432–444, DOI: 0.1016/j.cad.2011.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. T.; Armstrong, C.G.; Fairey, R.: Automated mixed dimensional modelling from 2D and 3D CAD models, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 47(2), 2011, 151–165, DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2010.08.010. doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2010.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, U.; Bharadwaj, B.: Design with part behaviors: behavior model, representation and applications, Computer-Aided Design, 34(9), 2002, 613–636, DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4485(01) 00129-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, U.; Pramanik, N.; Sudarsan, R.; Sriram, R. D.; Lyons, K. W.: Function-to-form mapping: model, representation and applications in design synthesis, Computer-Aided Design, 33(10), 2001, 699–719, DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00100-7.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, B.; Dabbeeru, M.M.; Chorney, A. S. and Gupta, S.K.: Automated assembly model simplification for finite element analysis; in proceedings of ASME Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; Chicago; IL, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shahwan, A.; Léon, J-C.; Foucault, G.; Trlin, M.; Palombi, O.: Qualitative behavioral reasoning from components’ interfaces to components’ functions for DMU adaption to FE analyses, Computer-Aided Design; 45; 2013, 383–394, DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, A.; Banerjee, A. G.; Gupta, S. K.: A survey of CAD model simplification techniques for physics-based simulation applications, Computer-Aided Design; 41(2), 2009, 65–80, DOI: 0.1016/j.cad.2008.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, D.G: The Mechanical Design Process, McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math; Fourth Edition (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, E.; Van der Meiden, R.; Bronsvoort, W.: Specification of free-form features, Int. Conf. ACM Solid Modeling and App., Seattle, USA, June 16–20, (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Van Holland, W.; Bronsvoort, W. F.: Assembly features in modeling and planning, RCIM, 16, pp 277–294, (2000), DOI: 10.1016/S0736-5845(00)00014-4.
   Google Scholar