A spatial design guideline for supporting creativity at architectural firms

References

• Martin L, Wilson N. The Palgrave handbook of creativity at work. Singapore: Springer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Florida R. The rise of the creative class–revisited: revised and expanded. U.S.A: Basic Books; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Martens Y, Haynes BP. Creative workplace: instrumental and symbolic support for creativity. Facilities. 2011;29(1/2):63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Doheim RM, Yusof N. Creativity in architecture design studio. Assessing students’ and instructors’ Perception. J Clean Prod. 2020;249:119418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg AJ, Kallio TJ. A review of the physical context of creativity: a three-dimensional framework for investigating the physical context of creativity. Int J Manage Rev. 2022;24(3):433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Vaughan E. Office design: an exploration of worker satisfaction and their perceptions of effective workspaces. Arizona, USA: Arizona State University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood NR. Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR’s strategic role. HR Magazine. 2007;52:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Miller AM. Fun in the workplace: Toward an environment-behavior framework relating office design, employee creativity, and job satisfaction [ Doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Samani A, Rasid A, Sofian S. A workplace to support creativity. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems. 2014;13(4):414–420.
   Google Scholar
• Vandeloo M. An exploration of the effects of creative office design within workplaces. Toronto, Canada: OCAD University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hietbrink D. Rethink The Design Office: Research into organisational creativity and the importance of group identity to creative design [ Masters Thesis]. TU Delft Architecture and the Built Environment; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Marks K. HR for Creative companies. London, U.K: RIBA Publishing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Arain HS, Shar BK, Nizamani FS. Architecture pedagogy: investigating the physical environment of design studio for pedagogical needs. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology. 2018;2:7.
   Google Scholar
• Izobo-Martins Oladunni, Aboderin Deborah, Abah George, et al. The impact of architectural studio conditions on students’creativity Proceedings of EDULEARN17 Conference, 3/7/2017, Barcelona, Spain. 2017. pp. 598–607.
   Google Scholar
• Kepez O, Üst S. Post occupancy evaluation of a transformed design studio. A| Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture. 2017;14(3):41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas D, van der Veer G, Nijholt A. Creative practices in the design studio culture: collaboration and communication. Cogn Tech Work. 2013;15(4):415–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaqour EN. Improving the architecture design studio internal environment at NUB. Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends. 2021;41(2):31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz S. Basic human values Their content and structure across cultures. Valores e trabalho (Values and work). 2005;1.
   Google Scholar
• Alaithan H. The influence of the built environment of the workplaces on the workers’ well-being a study towards enhancing prime working age workers’ productivity through interior design. Arizona, U.S.A: Master of Science, Arizona State University; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Collins MA, Conti R, et al. Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. New York, U.S.A: Routledge; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey B, Moran S, Altringer B, et al. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. American Cancer Soc. 2015;11:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton D. Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Evans GW, McCoy JM. When buildings don’t work: the role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1998;18(1):85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeworutzki A. Adapting agile methods to support creativity in interdisciplinary projects. Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg University of Applied Sciences; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio TJ, Kallio K-M, Blomberg AJ. Physical space, culture and organisational creativity–a longitudinal study. Facilities. 2015;33(5/6):389–411.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J. An investigation of workplace characteristics influencing knowledge worker’s sense of belonging and organizational outcomes [ Doctoral dissertation]. Dresden University of Technology; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy JM, Evans GW. The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Res J. 2002;14(3–4):409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements-Croome D, Turner B, Pallaris K. Flourishing workplaces: a multisensory approach to design and POE. Intelligent Buildings International. 2019;11(3–4):131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul J, Ceylan C, Jaspers F. Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Manage. 2011;50(6):715–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibowo G. Comparison of the models of organizational behavior: a review. Manag Econ Res J. 2017;2:1264.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes BP, Haynes BP. The impact of office layout on productivity. J Facil Manage. 2008;6(3):189–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960810885961.
   Google Scholar
• Peters S. Designing organizational workspace for creativity. California, U.S.A: Master of Science, Azusa Pacific University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes BP, Haynes BP. The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity. J Facil Manage. 2007;5(3):158–171. doi:10.1108/14725960710775045.
   Google Scholar
• Gensler. U.S workplace survey 2019. Las Vegas, U.S.A: Gensler; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Meinel M, Maier L, Wagner T, et al. Designing creativity-enhancing workspaces: a critical look at empirical evidence. Journal of Technology and Innovation Management. 2017;1:12.
   Google Scholar
• Becker F. Improving organisational performance by exploiting workplace flexibility. J Facil Manage. 2002;1(2):154–162.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes Barry P. The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity. J Facil Manage. 2007;5(3):158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Vithayathawornwong S, Danko S, Tolbert P. The role of the physical environment in supporting organizational creativity. Journal of Interior Design. 2003;29(1–2):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Asefi M, Haghparast F, Sharifi E. Comparative study of the factors affecting the generativity of office spaces. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2019;8(1):106–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young L. Creative workplace characteristics and innovative start-up companies. Facilities. 2016;34(7/8):413–432.
   Google Scholar
• Colenberg S, Jylhä T, Arkesteijn M. The relationship between interior office space and employee health and well-being – a literature review. Building Research & Information. 2020;49(3):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadick A-M, Kamardeen I. Enhancing employees’ performance and well-being with nature exposure embedded office workplace design. Journal of Building Engineering. 2020;32:101789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, McCoy J, Blossom N, et al. Using natural elements for reducing stress potential at work. Master of arts in interior design. Washington State University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen L, Adams J, Deal B, et al. Plants in the workplace: the effects of plant density on productivity, attitudes, and perceptions. Environment and Behavior. 1998;30(3):261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier L, Baccarella CV, Wagner TF, et al. Saw the office, want the job: the effect of creative workspace design on organizational attractiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2022;80:101773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag P. Office buildings. Singapore: Springer; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lukens GL. Office design: designing for productivity in the workplace. Illinois, U.S.A: Southern Illinois University at Carbondale; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Taher R. Organizational creativity through space design. Buffalo State College: International Center for Studies in Creativity; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Villalba E, Saltelli A, Cruisen A, et al. Measuring creativity: Proceedings for the conference,“Can creativity be measured?” Brussels, May 28-29, 2009. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan C, Dul J, Aytac S. Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 2008;18(6):589–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waly M. A design approach to enhance occupants’ productivity and creativity at workspaces. Master of Science in Architectural Engineering. Cairo University. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cvijanovic M, Sibinović M, Vukov TD. The relationship between workspace and office placement and workforce productivity and wellbeing. Evolution. 2019;73(6):1253–1264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leadon A. Workplace design: facilitating collaborative and individual work within the creative office environment. Florida, U.S.A: The Florida State University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Küller R, Ballal S, Laike T, et al. The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: a cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Null. 2006;49(14):1496–1507.
   Google Scholar
• Lan L, Hadji S, Xia L, et al. The effects of light illuminance and correlated color temperature on mood and creativity. Building Simul. 2020;14(3):463–475. DOI:10.1007/s12273-020-0652-z. Building Simulation
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe GB, Kennedy JR. Planning the modern public library building. London, U.S.A: Libraries Unlimited; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Al Horr Y, Arif M, Kaushik A, et al. Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: a review of the literature. Build Environ. 2016;105:369–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codreanu M. Indoor environmental quality: risk assessment concerning occupants comfort and health. The Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Jassy, Construction Architecture Section. 2013;67(71):191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Landry D. Encouraging creativity in the workplace through the physical environment: focusing of the office workstation. Nebraska, U.S.A: University of Nebraska-Lincoln; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Altan H. A comparison of the occupant comfort in a conventional high-rise office block and a contemporary environmentally-concerned building. Build Environ. 2011;46(2):535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haner U. Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2005;14(3):288–298.
   Google Scholar
• Needle R, Mallia KL. Creatives in the office: personality and the environmental effects of workspace. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising. 2021;42(3):277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoring K, Mueller RM, Desmet P, et al. Spatial design factors associated with creative work: a systematic literature review. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manufact. 2020;34(3):300–314.
   Google Scholar