Perceptual evaluation of tall building forms and facades in urban environments

References

• Camprag N. Effects of urban mega projects-case of the new ECB headquarters in Frankfurt, contemporary achievements in civil engineering. Serbia; 2015. pp. 663–668.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Mir M, Aksamija A. Toward a better urban life: integration of cities and tall buildings. The 4th Architectural Conference on High Rise Buildings, Amman-Jordan; 2008. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız A. Yüksek Yapıların Tarihi Kent Merkezlerine Etkileri: İstanbul, Ankara, Moskova ve Londra Örneklemi. Online J Art Des. 2023;11(5):301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill C. Fractal geometry in architecture and design. Boston: Birkhauser Verlag; 1996. p. 194–198.
   Google Scholar
• Heath T, Smith SG, Lim B. Tall buildings and urban skyline: the effect of visual complexity on preferences. Environ Behav. 2000;32(4):541–556. doi: 10.1177/00139160021972658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps AE. Fractals, skylines, nature, and beauty. Landscape Urban Plann. 2002;60(3):163–184. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00054-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerhall CM, Purcell T, Taylor R. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. J Environ Psychol. 2004;24(2):247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper J, Oskrochi R, Oskrochi R. The influence of fractal dimension and vegetation on the perceptions of streetscape quality in Taipei: with comparative comments made in relation to two British Case Studies. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2013;40(1):43–62. doi: 10.1068/b38010
   Google Scholar
• Lionar ML, Ediz Ö. Measuring visual complexity of Sedad Eldem’s SSK complex and its historical context: a comparative analysis using fractal dimensions. Nexus Netw J. 2020;22(3):701–715. doi: 10.1007/s00004-020-00482-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper J. Fractal assessment of street level skylines a possible means of assessing and comparing character. Urban Morphol. 2003;7(2):73–82. doi: 10.51347/jum.v7i2.3905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalup SK, Henderson N, Ostwald MJ, et al. A method for cityscape analysis by determining the fractal dimension of its skyline. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Architectural Science Association, Newcastle; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper J, Oskrochi R. Fractal analysis of street vistas: a potential tool for assessing levels of visual variety in everyday street scenes. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2008;35(2):349–363. doi: 10.1068/b33081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacha L, Matsumoto N, Mansouri A, et al. Predicting perceived complexity using local contrast statics and fractal information. Courrier du Savoir. 2013;16:89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena G, Yoichi K, Fukahori K. Fractal dimensions for streetscape visual complexity analysis, 3rd International Symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sri Lanka; 2015. 249–255.
   Google Scholar
• Akbarishahabi L. İ̇mgelenebilir kentsel mekanların niteliklerinin fraktal yaklaşım ile saptanması ve bir tasarım gramerinin geliştirilmesi. Doctoral Dissertation. Gazi University Institute of Applied Science, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Kalavi A. Kentsel mekanlarda sokaklar üzerinden ölçülebilir tasarım niteliklerin estetik beğeni ile bağlantılı değerlendirilmesi: New York kenti örneği [Doctoral Dissertation]. Gazi University Institute of Applied Science, Ankara; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ostwald MJ, Vaughan J. The fractal dimension of architecture. First ed. Basel: Birkhauser Publishing; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot B. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1982. p. 77.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger A, Salingaros NA. A pattern measure. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2000;27(4):537–547. doi: 10.1068/b2676
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs J. The death and life of Great American Cities. London: Vintage Books; 1961. p. 56.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız A, Kalaycı PD. The effect of the environment on the evaluation of tall building forms. III. International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium, Naples, Italy; 2023, s. 456.
   Google Scholar
• Vollers K. Morphological scheme of second-generation non-orthogonal high-rises. CTBUH 8th World Congress, Dubai; 2008, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh K, Sayedinnoor S. Super-tall buildings forms based on structural concepts and energy conservation principles. Archit Res. 2013;3(2):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y, You K. Dynamic responses of a tapered tall building to wind loads. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2002;90(12–15):1771–1782. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00286-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin P. Wind challenges of the new generation of super tall buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2009;97(7–8):328–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin JA, Ahuja AK. Aerodynamic modifications to the shape of the buildings: a review of the state-of-the-art. Asian J Civil Eng. 2010;11(4):433–450.
   Google Scholar
• Alaghmandan M, Bahrami P, Elnimeiri M. The future trend of architectural form and structural system in high-rise buildings. Archit Res. 2014;4(3):55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Tamura Y, Ohtake K, et al. Aerodynamic and flow characteristics of tall buildings with various unconventional configurations. Int J High-Rise Build. 2013;2(3):213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgın HE, Günel MH. Contemporary trends in supertall building form: aerodynamic design considerations. Livenarch. 2021;7:61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ostwald MJ, Vaughan J. Nature, and architecture: revisiting the fractal connection in Amasya and Sea Ranch. Launceston: School of Architecture and Design, University of Tasmania; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rian IM, Park J, Ahn HU. Fractal geometry as the synthesis of Hindu cosmology in Kandariya Mahadev Temple. Build Environ. 2007;1(28):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Spehar B, Clifford WG, Newell CR, et al. Universal aesthetic of fractals. Comput Ve Graph. 2003;27(5):27, 813–820. doi: 10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00154-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street N, Forsythe M, Reilly R, et al. A complex story: Universal Preference vs. Individual differences shaping aesthetic response to fractals patterns. Front Human Neurosci. 2016;10:10, 213. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne DE. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. New York: Wiley Press; 1974.
   Google Scholar