References and suggested readings
- Bennett, E. (2018). Dear humanities profs: We are the problem. The chronicle of higher education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Dear-Humanities-Profs-We-Are/243100
- Ewalt, J., Ohl, J., & Pfister, D. S. (2016). Rhetorical field methods in the tradition of imitatio. In S. L. McKinnon, R. Asen, K. R. Chávez, & R. G. Howard (Eds.), Field + text: Innovations in rhetorical method (pp. 40–55). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Goulet, B. (2015). Lost generation (Palindrome poem). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIEDuRcchjI
- Hauser, G. A. (2004). Teaching rhetoric: Or why rhetoric isn’t just another kind of philosophy or literary criticism. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 34, 39–53. doi: 10.1080/02773940409391289
- Muckelbauer, J. (2008). The future of invention: Rhetoric, postmodernism, and the problem of change. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Munsell, J. (2006). Challenging norms of invention: Mimesis and African American communication patterns. Communication Teacher, 20, 28–32. doi: 10.1080/14704620500428870
- Murphy, T. A. (2004). Deliberative civic education and civil society: A consideration of ideals and actualities in democracy and communication education. Communication Education, 53, 74–91. doi: 10.1080/0363452032000135788
- Terrill, R. (2011). Mimesis, duality, and rhetorical education. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 41, 295–315. doi: 10.1080/02773945.2011.553765
- Wilson, K. H. (2003). The racial politics of imitation in the nineteenth century. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89, 89–108. doi: 10.1080/00335630308178