James Mark Baldwin and contemporary theories of culture and evolution

References

• Ancel, L. W. (1999). A quantitative model of the Simpson–Baldwin effect. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 196, 197–209. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1998.0833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancel, L. W. (2000). Undermining the Baldwin expediting effect: Does phenotypic plasticity accelerate evolution? Theoretical Population Biology, 58, 307–319. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2000.1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. (1890). Recent discussion in materialism. The Presbyterian and Reformed Review, 3, 357–372.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. (1909). Darwin and the humanities. Baltimore, MD: Review.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. M. (1895). Mental development in the child and the race. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. M. (1896). A new factor in evolution. The American Naturalist, 30, 441–451  and 536–553.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and ethical interpretations in mental development. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. M. (1902). Development and evolution. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (2010). The human mind and the evolution of cultural animals. In M. Schaller, A. Norenzayan, S. J. Heine, T. Yamagishi, & T. Kameda (Eds.), Evolution, culture and the human mind (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. (2012). Anthropology and the cognitive challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N., Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009). Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1015–1020. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807191106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., Reali, F., & Chater, N. (2011). Biological adaptations for functional features of language in the face of cultural evolution. Human Biology, 83, 247–259. doi:10.3378/027.083.0206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. (2003). The Baldwin effect: A crane, not a skyhook. In B. H. Weber & D. J. Depew (Eds.), Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered (pp. 69–79).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickins, T. E., & Rahman, Q. (2012). The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2913–2921. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. L. (1997). Piaget in Paris: from “autism” to logic. Human Development, 40, 109–123. doi:10.1159/000278711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. L. (2012). Trusting what you're told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. (2004). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53, 3–35. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00094-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, G., & Nowlan, S. (1987). How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems, 1, 495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506. doi:10.1126/science.134.3489.1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesoudi, A., Blanchet, S., Charmantier, A., Danchin, É., Fogarty, L., Jablonka, E., … Pujol, B. (2013). Is non-genetic inheritance just a proximate mechanism? A corroboration of the extended evolutionary synthesis. Biological Theory, 7, 189–195. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0091-5.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. L. (1896). On modification and variation. Science, 4, 733–740. doi:10.1126/science.4.99.733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan, T. J. H. (in press). Testing the cognitive and cultural niche theories of human evolution. Current Anthropology.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, H. F. (1896). A mode of evolution requiring neither natural selection nor the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 15, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1929). Les races lacustres de la “Limnaea stagnales”: Recherches sur les rapports de l'adapatation hereditaires avec le milieu [Lacustrine lineages of “Limnaea stagnales”: Research on the relationship between hereditary adaptation and the environment]. Bulletin Biologique de la France et la Belgique, 63, 424–455.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1975). L'intelligence selon Alfred Binet [Intelligence according to Alfred Binet]. Société Alfred Binet et Théodore Simon. Psychologie de l'enfant et pédogogie expérimentale, 75, 106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1982). Reflections on Baldwin: An interview conducted and introduced by J. Jacques Vonèche. In J. M. Broughton & D. J. Freeman-Moir (Eds.), The cognitive developmental psychology of James Mark Baldwin: Current theory and research in genetic epistemology (pp. 80–86). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009). Sequential learning and the interaction between biological and linguistic adaptation in language evolution. Interaction Studies, 10, 5–30. doi:10.1075/is.10.1.02rea.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiner, S. B. (2014). The Baldwin effect: Neglected and misunderstood. American Naturalist, 184, ii–iii. doi:10.1086/677944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. G. (1953). The Baldwin effect. Evolution, 7, 110–117. doi:10.2307/2405746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonèche, J. (1982). Evolution, development and the growth of knowledge. In J. Broughton & D. Freeman-Noir (Eds.), The cognitive-developmental psychology of James Mark Baldwin (pp. 51–79). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, B. H., & Depew, D. J. (2007). Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Press MIT.
   Google Scholar
• West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wozniak, R. H. (1982). Metaphysics and science, reason and reality: The intellectual origins of genetic epistemology. In J. M. Broughton & D. J. Freeman-Moir (Eds.), The cognitive developmental psychology of James Mark Baldwin: Current theory and research in genetic epistemology (pp. 13–45). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wozniak, R. H. (2009). Consciousness, social heredity, and development: The evolutionary thought of James Mark Baldwin. American Psychologist, 64, 93–101. doi:10.1037/a0013850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar