731
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Developmetrics

Measuring moral reasoning using moral dilemmas: evaluating reliability, validity, and differential item functioning of the behavioural defining issues test (bDIT)

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 622-631 | Received 03 Oct 2018, Accepted 27 Apr 2019, Published online: 02 Jun 2019

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
  • Bingenheimer, J. B., Raudenbush, S. W., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Measurement equivalence and differential item functioning in family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 441–455.
  • Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Caravita, S. C. S., Giardino, S., Lenzi, L., Salvaterra, M., & Antonietti, A. (2012). Socio-economic factors related to moral reasoning in childhood and adolescence: The missing link between brain and behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00262
  • Clariana, R., & Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593–602.
  • De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.2307/2067520
  • Han, H. (2014). Analyzing theoretical frameworks of moral education through Lakatos’s philosophy of science. Journal of Moral Education, 43(1), 32–53.
  • Han, H., Dawson, K. J., Thoma, S. J., & Glenn, A. L. (2019). Developmental level of moral judgment influences behavioral patterns during moral decision-making. Journal of Experimental Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/00220973.2019.1574701
  • Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item functioning and the Mantel–Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test Validity (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Latif, D. A. (2001). The relationship between ethical reasoning and the perception of difficulty with ethical dilemmas in pharmacy students: Implications for teaching professional ethics. Teaching Business Ethics, 5(1), 107–117.
  • Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
  • Napolitano, C. M., Callina, K. S., & Mueller, M. K. (2013). Comparing alternate approaches to calculating reliability for dichotomous data: The sample case of adolescent selection, optimization, and compensation. Applied Developmental Science, 17(3), 148–151.
  • Osborne, J. W. (2003). Effect sizes and the disattenuation of correlation and regression coefficients: Lessons from educational psychology. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(11), 1–5.
  • Psychology Software Tools. (2016). E-Prime 2.0. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
  • Rest, J. R. (1990). DIT: Manual for the defining issues test. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Center for the Study of Ethical Development.
  • Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). A Neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291–324.
  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644–659.
  • Richardson, H. S. (2013). Moral reasoning. In E. N. Zalta Ed., The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-moral/
  • Teal, E. J., & Carroll, A. B. (1999). Moral reasoning skills: Are entrepreneurs different? Journal of Business Ethics, 19(3), 229–240.
  • Thoma, S., Derryberry, W. P., & Crowson, H. M. (2013). Describing and testing an intermediate concept measure of adolescent moral thinking. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 239–252.
  • Thoma, S. J. (1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 6(2), 165–180.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.