In my defence or yours: Children’s guilt subtypes and bystander roles in bullying

References

• Arsenio, W. F., Adams, E., & Gold, J. (2009). Social information processing, moral reasoning, and emotion attributions: Relations with adolescents’ reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 80, 1739–1755.
   Google Scholar
• Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(4), 289–297.
   Google Scholar
• Bellmore, A., Ma, T.-L., You, J.-I., & Hughes, M. (2012). A two-method investigation of early adolescents’ responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1265–1276.
   Google Scholar
• Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163.
   Google Scholar
• Card, N. A. (2011). Toward a relationship perspective on aggression among schoolchildren: Integrating social cognitive and interdependence theories. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 188–201.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2007). Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and peer rejection and their relation to bullying and helping among preadolescents: Comparing predictions from gender-homophily and goal-framing approaches. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1377–1389.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Espelage, D. L., Green, H., & Polanin, J. (2011). Willingness to intervene in bullying episodes among middle school students: Individual and peer-group influences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 776–801.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 528–539.
   Google Scholar
• Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 467–476.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Bullying in classrooms: Participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 38(6), 494–509.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1982). The transformation of motivation: Responsiveness to patterns of interdependence. In H. H. Kelley (Ed.). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes, 57-92. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730.
   Google Scholar
• Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t help? New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Malti, T. (2016). Toward an integrated clinical-developmental model of guilt. Developmental Review, 39, 16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Malti, T. (2017). Social-emotional responding task. Unpublished testing materials, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Malti, T., Dys, S. P., Colasante, T., & Peplak, J. (2018). Emotions and morality: New developmental perspectives. In C. Helwig, M. Harris, & E. Series (Eds.), Current issues in developmental psychology: New perspectives on moral development (pp. 55–72). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 80, 442–460.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzone, A., Camodeca, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016a). Interactive effects of guilt and moral disengagement on bullying, defending and outsider behavior. Journal of Moral Education, 45(4), 419–432.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzone, A., Camodeca, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016b). Stability and change of outsider behavior in school bullying: The role of shame and guilt in longitudinal perspective. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(2), 164–177.
   Google Scholar
• Menesini, E., & Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behavior regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behavior. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Menesini, E., & Gini, G. (2000). Il bullismo come processo di gruppo: Adattamento e validazione del questionario “Ruoli dei partecipanti” alla popolazione italiana. Eta’ Evolutiva, 66, 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Meter, D. J., & Card, N. A. (2015). Defenders of victims of peer aggression: Interdependence theory and an exploration of individual, interpersonal, and contextual effects on the defender participant role. Developmental Review, 38, 222–240.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., & Werth, J. M. (2015). The relation of empathy and defending in bullying: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 372–390.
   Google Scholar
• Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2016). KiVa anti-bullying program in italy: evidence of effectiveness in a randomized control trial. Prevention Science, 17(8), 1012–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Level and change of bullying behavior during high school: A multilevel growth curve analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 495–505.
   Google Scholar
• Nocentini, A., Palladino, B. E., & Menesini, E. (2019). For Whom Is Anti-Bullying Intervention Most Effective? The Role of Temperament, International Journal of Environ. Res. Public Health, 16(3), 388.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 437–452.
   Google Scholar
• Obermann, M.-L. (2011). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10, 239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A., & van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339–359.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827.
   Google Scholar
• Pronk, J., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2014). Differential personality correlates of early adolescents’ bullying-related outsider and defender behavior. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1069–1091.
   Google Scholar
• Pronk, J., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2016). Factors influencing interventions on behalf of victims of bullying: A counterfactual approach to the social cognitions of outsiders and defenders. Journal of Early Adolescence, 36, 267–291.
   Google Scholar
• Rieffe, C., Camodeca, M., Pouw, L. B. C., Lange, A. M. C., & Stockmann, L. (2012). Don’t anger me! Bullying, victimization, and emotion dysregulation in young adolescents with ASD. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676.
   Google Scholar
• Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotion and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 475–483.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Jungert, T. (2015). Unique and interactive effects of moral emotions and moral disengagement on bullying and defending among school children. Journal of Elementary School, 116, 322–337.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., Tenenbaum, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Vanegas, G. (2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene? Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, A., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Malti, T. (2017). Psychological processes in young bullies versus bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 43(5), 430–439.
   Google Scholar
• Zambuto, V., Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2018). Why do some students want to be actively involved as peer educators, while others do not? Findings from NoTrap! anti-bullying and anti-cyberbullying program. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(4), 373–386. doi:10.1080/17405629.2017.1419954
   Google Scholar