1,743
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The integrative model of ICT effects on Adolescents’ well-being (iMEW): The synthesis of theories from developmental psychology, media and communications, and health

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 944-961 | Received 25 Jan 2022, Accepted 05 Oct 2022, Published online: 06 Nov 2022

References

  • Benson, M. J., & Buehler, C. (2012). Family process and peer deviance influences on adolescent aggression: Longitudinal effects across early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 83(4), 1213–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01763.x
  • Blinka, L., & Smahel, D. (2009). Fourteen is fourteen and a girl is a girl: Validating the identity of adolescent bloggers. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 735–739. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0044
  • Bolls, P. D., Weber, R., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2019). Media psychophysiology and neuroscience: Bringing brain science into media processes and effects research. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th ed., pp. 288–307). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491146
  • Bonus, J. A., Peebles, A., Mares, M.-L., & Sarmiento, I. G. (2018). Look on the bright side (of media effects): Pokémon Go as a catalyst for positive life experiences. Media Psychology, 21(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1305280
  • Borca, G., Bina, M., Keller, P. S., Gilbert, L. R., & Begotti, T. (2015). Internet use and developmental tasks: Adolescents’ point of view. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.029
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
  • Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2008). The health belief model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 45–65). Jossey-Bass.
  • Chang, F. C., Chiu, C. H., Chen, P. H., Chiang, J. T., Miao, N. F., Chuang, H. Y., & Liu, S. M. (2019). Children’s use of mobile devices, smartphone addiction and parental mediation in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.048
  • Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Lugtig, P., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). The role of perceived peer norms in the relationship between media violence exposure and adolescents’ aggression. Media Psychology, 19(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1037960
  • Gámez-Guadix, M., Borrajo, E., & Almendros, C. (2016). Risky online behaviors among adolescents: Longitudinal relations among problematic Internet use, cyberbullying perpetration, and meeting strangers online. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.013
  • Gassó, A. M., Klettke, B., Agustina, J. R., & Montiel, I. (2019). Sexting, mental health, and victimization among adolescents: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132364
  • Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education. David McKay Company.
  • Helsper, E. J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U., Sagvari, B., & de Haan, J. (2013). Country classification: opportunities, risks, harm and parental mediation. EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/42872
  • Houston, J. B., Spialek, M. L., & First, J. (2018). Disaster media effects: A systematic review and synthesis based on the differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 68(4), 734–757. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy023
  • Jessor, R. (2014). Problem behavior Theory: A half century of research on adolescent behavior and development. In R. Lerner, A. C. Petersen, R. K. Silbereisen, & J. Brooks-Gun (Eds.), The developmental science of adolescence: History through autobiography (pp. 239–536). Psychology Press.
  • Johnson, G. M. (2010). Internet use and child development: The techno-microsystem. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 10, 32–43. https://www.newcastle.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/100292/V10_johnson.pdf
  • Johnson, G. M., & Puplampu, K. P. (2008). Internet use during childhood and the ecological technosubsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de l’Apprentissage Et de la Technologie, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2CP4T
  • Kurek, A., Jose, P. E., & Stuart, J. (2017). Discovering unique profiles of adolescent information and communication technology (ICT) use: Are ICT use preferences associated with identity and behaviour development? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(4). Article 3 https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-4-3
  • Kvardova, N., Smahel, D., Machackova, H., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2021). Who is exposed to harmful online content? The role of risk and protective factors among Czech, Finnish, and Spanish adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(12), 2294–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01422-2
  • Landrum, A. R., Olshansky, A., & Richards, O. (2019). Differential susceptibility to misleading flat earth arguments on youtube. Media Psychology, 24(1), 136–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1669461
  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930
  • Maimon, D., Howell, C. J., Jacques, S., & Perkins, R. C. (2020). Situational awareness and public Wi-Fi users’ self-protective behaviors. Security Journal, 35(1), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-020-00270-2
  • Mikuška, J., Smahel, D., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Mascheroni, G., & Milosevic, T. (2020). Social relational factors of excessive internet use in four European countries. International Journal of Public Health, 65(8), 1289–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01484-2
  • Minkkinen, J. (2013). The structural model of child well-being. Child Indicators Research, 6(3), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9178-6
  • Mýlek, V., Dedkova, L., & Machackova, H. (2020). Factors influencing interactions between adolescents and unknown people from the internet: Findings from five European countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 114, 105038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105038
  • Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2008). How to overcome health-compromising behaviors: The health action process approach. European Psychologist, 13(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.141
  • Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU kids online 2020: survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
  • Smahel, D., Wright, M. F., & Cernikova, M. (2014). Classification of online problematic situations in the context of youths’ development. Communications: European Journal of Communication Research, 39(3), 233–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0111
  • Stavropoulos, V., Motti-Stefanidi, F., & Griffiths, M. D. (2022). Risks and opportunities for youth in the digital era: A cyber-developmental approach to mental health. European Psychologist, 27(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000451
  • Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). Connecting online behavior to adolescent development: A theoretical framework. In K. Subrahmanyam &D. Šmahel (Eds.), Digital youth: The role of media in development (pp. 27–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6278-2_2
  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
  • Vandoninck, S., d’Haenens, L., & Smahel, D. (2014). Preventive measures: How youngsters avoid online risks. EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55797/
  • Vazsonyi, A. T., Chen, P., Jenkins, D. D., Burcu, E., Torrente, G., & Sheu, C.-J. (2010). Jessor’s problem behavior theory: Cross-national evidence from Hungary, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1779–1791. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020682
  • WHO. (2001) . Basic documents (43rd ed.). World Health Organization.