PRESUPPOSITION IN DISCOURSE

References

• Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekalu, M. A. (2007). Presupposition in news discourse. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 147–172. doi: 10.1177/0957926506060248
   Google Scholar
• Borutti, S. (1984). Pragmatics and its discontents. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 437–447. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(84)90036-5
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Parliamentary debates. In R. Wodak & T. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the top: Parliamentary debates on ethnic issues in six European states (pp. 45–78). Klagenfurt: Drava.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2003). The discourse-knowledge interface. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 85–109). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Contextual knowledge management in discourse production: A CDA perspective. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity (pp. 71–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ducrôt, O. (1980). Analyse des textes et linguistique d'enonciation. In O. Ducrôt, S. Bruxelles, É. Fouquier, J. Gouazé, G. Dos Reis Nunes, A. Rémis, … L. Ragunet de Saint Alban (Eds.), Les Mots du Discours (pp. 7–57). Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. C. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, VI, 222–254.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. C., & Atkins, B. T. (1992). Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts (pp. 75–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, G. (1892/1952). On sense and reference. In P. T. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). Felicity's condition. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S. (1995). Pragmatics and power. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations in cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. In R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Semantics from different points of view (pp. 172–187). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marmaridou, S. (2000). Pragmatic meaning and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2008). Language and sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polyzou, A. (2008a, May 15–18). ‘Given’ and ‘new’ knowledge: Presupposition and shared knowledge in Greek lifestyle magazines. Paper presented at the 4th Łódż Symposium: New Developments in Linguistic Pragmatics, Łódż, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Polyzou, A. (2008b). Genre-based data selection and classification for critical discourse analysis. In M. KhosraviNik & A. Polyzou (Eds.), Papers from the Lancaster University postgraduate conference in linguistics and language teaching (LAEL PG) (Vol. 2). Retrieved from http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/pgconference/v02/06-Polyzou.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Polyzou, A. (2010). Desire, sexualities and 'lifestyle': Masculinity constructs in three Greek men's lifestyle magazines. In C. Canakis, V. Kantsa, & K. Yannakopoulos (Eds.), Language and sexuality (through and) beyond gender (pp. 112–139). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Polyzou, A. (2014). Presupposition (ideological) knowledge management and gender: A socio-cognitive discourse analytical approach (Unpublished PhD thesis). Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493. doi: 10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, J. (2003). Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sbisà, M. (1999). Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. In J. Verschueren (Ed.), Language and ideology. Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Association Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 492–509). Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–457. doi: 10.1007/BF00262951
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1974/1991). Pragmatic presuppositions. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind 59, 320–344.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, M. (1995). Fictions at work. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15, 203–225. doi: 10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
   Google Scholar