Protesting Too Much: Alastair Darling's constructions after the Financial Crash

References

• Antaki, C., & Horowitz, A. (2000). Using identity ascription to disqualify a rival version of events as ‘interested’. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 33(2), 155–177. doi: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3302_2
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Wetherall, A. (1999). Show concessions. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001001002
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, L. (2013). AntConc 3.2.4w. Retrieved May 4, 2013, from www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/antconc_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Bank of England. (2010). Extract from the red book: The Bank's current operations in the sterling money markets. The red book, chapter VIII: quantitative easing. Retrieved July 14, 2013, from http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/Documents/money/publications/redbookqe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, W. (2013). We are the 99 percent: Occupy and the economics of discontent. In R. Guarriello Heath, C. V. Fletcher, & R. Munoz, (Eds.), Understanding occupy from Wall Street to Portland: Applied studies in communication theory (pp. 17–34). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, É. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M., Fisher, P., & Weeken, O. (2010). The bank's balance sheet during the crisis. Quarterly Bulletin of the Bank of England, 50(1), 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Englen, E., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., Moran, M., Nilsson, A., & Williams, K. (2011). After the great complacence: Financial crisis and the politics of reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2011). Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK Government's response to the economic crisis in the 2008 budget report. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 243–268. doi: 10.1177/0957926510395439
   Google Scholar
• Finalyson, A. (2006). What's the problem?: Political theory, rhetoric and problem-setting. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 9(4), 541–557.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B., & Harris, L. (1985). The peculiarities of the British economy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Froud, J., Johal, S., Montgomerie, J., & Williams, K. (2010). Escaping the tyranny of earned income?: The failure of finance as social innovation. New Political Economy, 15(1), 147–164. doi: 10.1080/13563460903553723
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Experiments are the key: Participants’ histories and historians’ histories of science. Isis., 75(1), 105–125. doi: 10.1086/353435
   Google Scholar
• Glyn, A. (2006). Capitalism unleashed: Finance, globalisation, and welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25(1–2), 1–30. doi: 10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellwig, T., & Coffey, E. (2011). Public opinion, party messages, and responsibility for the financial crisis in Britain. Electoral Studies, 30(3), 417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, J. A. (2009). The history and theory of rhetoric: An introduction. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2013). Budget. Retrieved March 5, 2013, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/budget.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ho, K. (2012, May 15). Occupy Finance and the Paradox/Possibilities of Productivity. Fieldsights – Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology Online, Retrieved February 19, 2015, from http://www.culanth.org/fieldsights/340-occupy-finance-and-the-paradox-possibilities-of-productivity
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D., & Mabbett, D. (2009). UK economic policy and the global financial crisis: Paradigm lost? Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(5), 1041–1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02034.x
   Google Scholar
• Holmer Nadeson, M. (2013). Neofeudalism and the financial crisis: Implications for occupy wall street. In R. Guarriello Heath, C. V. Fletcher, & R. Munoz (Eds.), Understanding occupy from Wall Street to Portland: Applied studies in communication theory (pp. 35–52). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, G. (1984). Capitalism divided? The City and industry in British social development. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, M., Lasaosa, A., Stevens, I., & Tong, M. (2010). The financial market impact of quantitative easing (Bank of England Working Paper No. 393). Retrieved August 6, 2013, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1638986
   Google Scholar
• Konings, M. (2011). The development of American finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P. (2008). The everyday life of global finance: Saving and borrowing in Anglo-America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapavistas, C. (2008, October 2). No private matter. The Guardian.. Retrieved February 19, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/02/creditcrunch.marketturmoil
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2014). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2009). Maintaining financial stability across the United Kingdom's banking system. Report by the comptroller and auditor general: HC 91, Session 2009–2010. Retrieved July 18, 2013, from http://www.nao.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2009/12/091091es.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz, S., Buchanan, S., & Bapuji, H. (2011). Institutional work amidst the financial crisis: Emerging positions of elite actors. Organization, 18(2), 187–214. doi: 10.1177/1350508410389630
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. K., & Jacoby, W. G. (2005). Elite discourse and American public opinion: The case of welfare spending. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 367–379. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800301
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. M. (2008). Housing, global finance, and American hegemony: Building conservative politics one brick at a time. Comparative European Politics, 6, 262–284. doi: 10.1057/cep.2008.11
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. (2006). The social sources of financial power: Domestic legitimacy and international financial orders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. (2009, March 8). A failure to control animal spirits. Financial Times. Retrieved February 19, 2015, from http://cachef.ft.com/cms/s/0/453e55ca-0c0c-11de-b87d-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz3SCy9kqfT.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H. S. (2009). Reflections on Northern Rock: The bank run that heralded the global financial crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 101–119. doi: 10.1257/jep.23.1.101
   Google Scholar
• Skidelsky, R., & Joshi, V. (2008, November 11). A dangerous free for all.. The Guardian. Retrieved February 25, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/nov/11/global-economy-banking-reforms
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, K., & Hargie, O. (2011). Double-bind accountability dilemmas: Impression management and accountability strategies used by senior banking executives. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(10), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., & Mueller, F. (2011). Bankers in the dock: Moral storytelling in action. Human Relations, 65(1), 111–139. doi: 10.1177/0018726711423442
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems' explanations. Social problems, 32(3), 214–227. doi: 10.2307/800680
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Hansard.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 12 March 2008a vol 472 c286.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 12 March 2008b vol c295.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 12 March 2008c vol. 508 c292.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 8 October 2008 vol 480 c278.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 22 April 2009a vol 481 cc245–246.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 22 April 2009b vol c241.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 22 April 2009c vol 481 c244.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 24 March 2010a vol 508 c251.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 24 March 2010b vol 508. c250.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 24 March 2010c vol 508 cc255–256.
   Google Scholar
• UK PARLIAMENT HC Deb 24 March 2010d vol 508 c262.
   Google Scholar