Polyphony and polarization in public discourses: hegemony and dissent in a Slovene policy debate

References

• Agha, A. (2005). Voice, Footing, Enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 38–59.
   Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulos, J. (2009). Policing practices in heteroglossic mediascapes: A commentary on interfaces. Language Policy, 8(3), 285–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angermüller, J. (2011). From the many voices to the subject positions in anti-globalization discourse. Enunciative pragmatics and the polyphonic organization of subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2992–3000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angermüller, J. (2012). Fixing meaning. The many voices of the post-liberal hegemony in Russia. Journal of Language and Politics, 11(1), 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benveniste, É. (1974). Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2014). Heteroglossia as practice and Pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New language? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (2008). The Bologna process and the knowledge-based economy: A critical discourse analysis approach. In R. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge based economy in Europe (pp. 109–126). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (2010). Capitalist Realism: Is there No alternative? Winchester: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M., & Gilbert, J. (2013). Capitalist Realism and neoliberal hegemony: Jeremy Gilbert A dialogue. New Formations 80-81, 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Grossen, M., & Salazar-Orvig, A. (2011). Dialogism and dialogicality in the study of the self. Culture and Psychology, 17(4), 491–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2011). The Enigma of capital: And the Crises of capitalism. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. (2008). Language and the nation-state: Challenges to sociolinguistic theory and practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 504–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, D. (2017). More than a lingua franca: Functions of English in a globalised educational language policy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 30(3), 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a lingua franca in the international university: The politics of academic English language policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2008). A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe (pp. 11–39). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2013). Positioning the language policy arbiter: Governmentality and footing in the School District of Philadelphia. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 116–136). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, K., Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 35–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kalin Golob, M., Stabej, M., Stritar Kučuk, M., Červ, G., & Kropivnik, S. (2014). Jezikovna politika in jeziki visokega šolstva v Sloveniji. Ljubljana: FDV.
   Google Scholar
• Krašovec, P., & Žagar, I. (2011). Evropa med socializmom in neoliberalizmom: Evropa v slovenskih medijih. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2011). Political strategies and language policies: The European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy. Language Policy, 10(2), 115–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2005). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., & Schultz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for Democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietikäinen, S., & Dufva, H. (2006). Voices in discourses: Dialogism, critical discourse analysis and ethnic identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(2), 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2015). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 23–61). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Savski, K. (2016). Analysing voice in language policy: Plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents. Language Policy, 15(4), 505–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savski, K. (2017). Language policy at times of instability and struggle: The impact of fluctuating will and competing agendas on a Slovene language strategy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(3), 283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savski, K. (2018a). The roles of field and capital in negotiating language policy in the Slovene parliament. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(1), 24–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savski, K. (2018b). Monolingualism and prescriptivism: The ecology of Slovene in the 20th century. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(2), 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (2001). Action and text: Towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 139–183). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (2008). Analyzing public discourse: Discourse analysis in the making of public policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, S. (2001). Habitus, Consciousness, agency and the problem of intention: How we carry and are carried by political discourses. Folia Linguistica, 35(1-2), 97–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2007). Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought. Presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Short, M. (2012). Discourse presentation and speech (and writing, but not thought) summary. Language and Literature, 21(1), 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2011). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 1–22). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zavala, I. (1990). Bakhtin and otherness: Social heterogeneity. In C. Thomson (Ed.), Mikhail Bakhtin and the Epistemology of discourse (Vol. 2, pp. 77–110). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (1984). Krekovstvo. Družboslovne razprave, 1(1), 147–164.
   Google Scholar