Empowerment as an affective-discursive technology in contemporary capitalism: insights from a play

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, U. (2016). The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buttny, R. (1990). Blame-account sequences in therapy: The negotiation of relational meanings. Semiotica, 78(3/4), 219–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A., & Holm Kvist, M. (2017). The comforting touch: Tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 109–127. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, E.-Y. (1999). Analysis of sermons delivered by Korean, Filipino and American pastors: The view of genre analysis. RELC Journal, 30(2), 44–60. doi: 10.1177/003368829903000203
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2014). Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 51–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics. Pragmatics, 24(3), 623–647. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, J. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge & the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Garnice, N. (n.d.). 6 ways to spice up your relationship with your job. The Muse. Retrieved from https://www.themuse.com/advice/6-ways-to-spice-up-your-relationship-with-your-job
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R., & Herdieckerhoff, E. (2006). Rewriting the romance. Feminist Media Studies, 6(4), 487–504. doi: 10.1080/14680770600989947
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2011). Introduction. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity (pp. 1–17). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Graefer, A. (2016). The work of humour in affective capitalism: A case study of celebrity gossip blogs. Ephimera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(4), 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Hazel, S. (2015). Acting, interacting, enacting – representing medical practice in theatre performance. In M. Kjær, J. L. Jørgensen, & A. Holm Riis (Eds.), Thematic issue on ‘health’, Akademisk Kvarter/Academic quarter (pp. 44–64). Aalborg: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Heelas, P., & Woodhead, L. (2005). The spiritual revolution: Why religion is giving way to spirituality. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, J. B., & Sardinha, T. B. (2015). Metaphor in specialist discourse. In J. B. Herrmann & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Introduction to membership categorization analysis. In W. Housley & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Advances in membership categorization analysis (pp. 1–22). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Karppi, T., Kähkönen, L., Mannevuo, M., Pajala, M., & Sihvonen, T. (2016). Affective capitalism: Investments and investigations. Ephimera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(4), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppinen, K. (2012). Subjects of Aspiration. Untersuchung von diskursiven Prozessen neoliberaler Regierung in einer postfeministischen Frauenzeitschrift. Finnische Beiträge zur Germanistik 28. Doctoral thesis. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppinen, K. (2013). ‘Full power despite stress’: A discourse analytical examination of the interconnectedness of postfeminism and neoliberalism in the domain of work in an international women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 7(2), 133–151. doi: 10.1177/1750481313476596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, C., Rasmussen, C., & Rishi, P. (2010). The rationality of empowerment: Microcredit, accumulation by dispossession, and the gendered economy. Signs, 36(1), 153–176. doi: 10.1086/652911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kela, M. (2014). Uskonnollinen metafora väitelauseena [religious metaphor as a declarative sentence]. In R. Nissi & A. Mielikäinen (Eds.), Sanaa tutkimassa: Näkökulmia uskonnolliseen kieleen ja sen käyttöön [studying the word: Perspectives on religious language and its uses] (pp. 307–336). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. (2005). Gaze as social control: How very young children differentiate “the look” from a “mere look” by their adult caregivers. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(4), 417–449. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kupetz, M. (2014). Empathy displays as interactional achievements: Multimodal and sequential aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 4–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (1998). Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text, 18(2), 143–157. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, N. J. (2000). The classical plot and the invention of Western narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. (2010). Analysing popular music: Image, sound and text. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. (2013). What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies, 10, 347–355. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2013.813770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31(2), 83–109. doi: 10.2307/1354446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nissi, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2016). Negotiation of expertise and multifunctionality: PowerPoint presentations as interactional activity types in workplace meetings. Language & Communication, 48, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, T. (1997). The brand called you. Fast Company. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/28905/brand-called-you
   Google Scholar
• Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 483–495. doi: 10.1023/A:1005120109296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed). London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, A., & Haarni, E. (2016). Zen and the art of everything: Governing spirituality in entrepreneurship education. Ephimera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(4), 99–119.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (1994). Emphatic speech style – special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 375–408. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90116-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language in Society, 43, 185–207. doi: 10.1017/S0047404514000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2015). Experience sharing, emotional reciprocity, and turn-taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 450. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 489–516. doi: 10.1177/1461445604046591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2011). The language of colour. An introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vänskä, A. (2016). ‘Cause I wuv you!’ Pet dog fashion and emotional consumption. Ephimera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(4), 75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and discourse – what’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, 6(4), 349–368. doi: 10.1057/sub.2013.13
   Google Scholar