Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers

References

• Amossy, R. (2005). The argumentative dimension of discourse. In F. H. Van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Practices of argumentation (pp. 87–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Amossy, R. (2009a). The New Rhetoric’s inheritance. Argumentation and discourse analysis. Argumentation, 23, 313–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amossy, R. (2009b). Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic, 29(3), 252–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amossy, R. (2010). L’argumentation dans le discours [Argumentation in discourse] (3rd ed.). Paris: A. Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Angouri, J., & Wodak, R. (2014). ‘They became big in the shadow of the crisis’. Discourse & Society, 25(4), 540–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin, A., & Richardson, J. E. (2007). Arguing about Muslims: (Un)reasonable argumentation in letters to the editor. Text & Talk, 27(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012a). ‘Value added’: Language, image and news values. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2–3), 103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012b). News discourse. London and New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Boukala, S. (2016). Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on 'Islamist terrorism. Discourse Studies, 18(3), 249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukala, S. (2019). European identity and the representation of Islam in the mainstream press: Argumentation and media discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boukala, S., & Dimitrakopoulou, D. (2018). Absurdity and the ‘blame Game’ within the Schengen area: Analyzing Greek (social) media discourses on the refugee crisis. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1-2), 179–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breazu, P., & Machin, D. (2018). A critical multimodal analysis of the Romanian press coverage of camp evictions and deportations of the Roma migrants from France. Discourse & Communication, 12(4), 339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feteris, E. T., Groarke, L., & Plug, H. J. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectic analysis of the use of the topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. T. Feteris, B. Garssen, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: In honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. (2018). The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, S., Perret-Clermont, A. N., Iannaccone, A., Rocci, A., Convertini, J., & Schär, R. (2018). The analysis of implicit premises within children’s argumentative inferences. Informal Logic, 38(4), 438–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco Morasso, S. (2012). Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case-study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies, 14(2), 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco Morasso, S., & Morasso, C. (2014). Argumentation from expert opinion in science journalism: The case of Eureka’s Fight Club. In S. Oswald, & T. Herman (Eds.), Rhétorique et Cognition (pp. 185–213). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic, 18, 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M, M. I. (2004). An Introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzidaki, O., & Goutsos, D. (Eds.). (2017). Greece in crisis: Combining critical discourse and corpus linguistics perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, T., & Serafis, D. (forthcoming). Emotions, argumentation and argumentativity: Insights from an analysis of newspapers headlines in the context of the Greek crisis. Informal Logic.
   Google Scholar
• KhosraviNik, M. (2009). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society, 20(4), 477–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, J. E. (Ed.). (2015). Visual and multimodal argumentation [Special Issue]. Argumentation, 29(2), 115–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, J. E. (2017). The rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photography. In A. Tseronis, & C. Forceville (Eds.), Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres (pp. 51–80). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social-semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1998). Front pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 186–219). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343–368.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., Triandafyllidou, A., & Wodak, R. (2018). The mediatization and the politicization of the ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe [Special Issue]. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 1–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krżyzanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2008). The politics of exclusion. Debating migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2018). Doing visual analysis: From theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. (2015). Stop the boats! Moral panic in Australia over asylum seekers. Continuum, 29(3), 304–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Lirola, M. (2017). Analysing visual dysphemisms in news items on the arrival of sub-saharan immigrants to Spain in small boats: Visual strategies of pity, fear and compassion. Palabra Clave – Revista de Comunicación, 20(2), 411–443.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, A. (2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), 41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos, P. (Ed.). (2017). Narration as argument. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Palmieri, R. (2014). Corporate argumentation in takeover bids. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969 [1958]). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollaroli, C. (2016). T(r)opical patterns in advertising. The argumentative relevance of multimodal metaphor in print advertisements (PhD dissertation). Università della Svizzera italiana.
   Google Scholar
• Pollaroli, C., & Rocci, A. (2015). The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4(2), 158–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychogios, D. (2004). Τα Έντυπα μέσα επικοινωνίας. Από τον πηλό στο δίκτυο [Print media. From the clay to the network]. Athens: Kastaniotis.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 23–61). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E. (2004). (Mis)Representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E. (2008). ‘Our England’: Discourses of ‘race’ and class in party election leaflets. Social Semiotics, 18(3), 321–335.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. E., & Wodak, R. (2009). The impact of visual racism: Visual arguments in political leaflets of Austrian and British far-right parties. Controversia, 6(2), 45–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rigotti, E., & Greco, S. (2019). Inference in argumentation: A topics-based approach to argument schemes. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2010). Comparing the argumentum model of topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation, 24, 489–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocci, A., & Pollaroli, C. (Eds.). (2018). Multimodality in argumentation [Special Issue]. Semiotica, 220, 1–299.
   Google Scholar
• Serafis, D., & Herman, T. (2018). Media discourse and pathos: Sketching a critical and integrationist approach – Greek and French headlines before the Greek referendum of 2015. Social Semiotics, 28(2), 184–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseronis, A. (2015). Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis. Discourse, Context and Media, 7, 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseronis, A. (2017). Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework: Strategic manoeuvring in the front covers of The Economist. In F. H. Van Eemeren, & W. Peng (Eds.), Contextualizing pragma-dialectics (pp. 335–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tseronis, A. (2018). Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide. Semiotica, 2018, 41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Tseronis, A., & Forceville, C. (Eds.). (2017). Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1991a). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1991b). The interdisciplinary study of news as discourse. In K. Bruehn-Jensen, & N. Jankowski (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative methods in mass communication research (pp. 108–120). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, TΑ. (2008). Discourse and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eemeren, F. H., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2017). Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation (2nd ed). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Three models of interdisciplinarity. In R. Wodak, & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis (pp. 3–18). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–95). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Angouri, J. (Eds.). (2014). From Grexit to Grecovery: Euro/crisis discourses [Special Issue]. Discourse & Society, 25(4), 417–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žagar, I. (2010). Topoi in critical discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6(1), 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zampa, M. (2017). Argumentation in the newsroom. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar