References
- Biegoń, D. (2017). Hegemonies of legitimation: Discourse dynamics in the European commission. Springer.
- Biglieri, P., & Perelló, G. (2012). The names of the real in Laclau’s theory: Antagonism, dislocation, and heterogeneity. Filozofski Vestnik, 32(2), 47–64.
- Bollen, Y. (2018). EU trade policy. In H. Heinelt, & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies. Interpretive approaches to the EU (pp. 191–206). Edward Elgar.
- Clarke, M. (2012). Talkin’‘bout a revolution: The social, political, and fantasmatic logics of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.623244
- Eleveld, A. (2016). The role of ideas in policy and institutional change: A comparison of the open functional approach, constructivism and discourse theory. Political Studies, 64(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12207
- Featherstone, K. (1994). Jean Monnet and the ‘democratic deficit’ in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1994.tb00491.x
- Foucault, M. (2013). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge. ( Original work published 1969).
- Gheyle, N. (2019). Trade policy with the lights on. The origins, dynamics, and consequences of the politicization of TTIP [Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University]. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8600487
- Glynos, J. (2008). Ideological fantasy at work. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(3), 282–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310802376961
- Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. Routledge.
- Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
- Herschinger, E. (2012). ‘Hell is the other’: Conceptualising hegemony and identity through discourse theory. Millennium, 41(1), 65–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812449501
- Irwin, D. (1998). Against the tide: An intellectual history of free trade. Princeton University Press.
- Jacobs, T. (2018). The dislocated universe of Laclau and Mouffe: An introduction to post-structuralist discourse theory. Critical Review, 30(3–4), 294–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2018.1565731
- Jacobs, T. (2019). Poststructuralist discourse theory as an independent paradigm for studying institutions: Towards a new definition of ‘discursive construction’ in institutional analysis. Contemporary Political Theory, 18(3), 379–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0279-3
- Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
- Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. Verso.
- Laclau, E. (1995). The time is out of joint. Diacritics, 25(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/465146
- Laclau, E. (2005a). On populist reason. Verso.
- Laclau, E. (2005b). Heterogeneity and post-modernity. Revista Brasileira, 40, 39–50.
- Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso. ( Original work published 1985).
- Lang, A. (2011). World trade law after neoliberalism: Reimagining the global economic order. Oxford University Press.
- Nonhoff, M. (2018). Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie: Das Projekt ‘soziale Marktwirtschaft’ [Political Discourse and Hegemony: the ‘Social Market Project’]. Transcript Verlag.
- Nonhoff, M. (2019). Hegemony analysis: Theory, methodology and research practice. In T. Marttila (Ed.), Discourse, culture and organization (pp. 63–104). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Phelan, S. (2014). Neoliberalism, media and the political. Springer.
- Remling, E. (2018). Logics, assumptions and genre chains: A framework for poststructuralist policy analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1382382
- Ruggie, J. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
- Stäheli, U. (2004). Competing figures of the limit. Dispersion, transgression, antagonism, indifference. In S. Critchley, & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A critical reader (pp. 226–240). Routledge.
- Stengel, F., & Nabers, D. (2019). Symposium: The contribution of laclau’s discourse theory to international relations and international political economy: Introduction. New Political Science, 41(2), 248–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2019.1596683
- Thomassen, L. (2005a). Antagonism, hegemony and ideology after heterogeneity. Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(3), 289–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310500244313
- Thomassen, L. (2005b). Reading radical democracy: A commentary on Clive Barnett. Political Geography, 24(5), 631–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.01.001
- Thomassen, L. (2019). “Discourse and heterogeneity.”. In T. Marttila (Ed.), Discourse, culture and organization (pp. 43–61). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Zienkowski, J. (2019). Politics and the political in critical discourse studies: State of the art and a call for an intensified focus on the metapolitical dimension of discursive practice. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1535988