References
- Aquilonius, J. (2017, December 20). Det fanns ett oerhört behov av #Akademiuppropet. https://universitetslararen.se/2017/12/20/det-fanns-ett-oerhort-behov-av-akademiuppropet/
- Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 37, 220.
- Bartlett, J. (2014). Populism, social media and democratic strain. In C. Sandelind (Ed.), European populism and winning the immigration debate (pp. 99–116). Scandbook.
- Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Polity Press.
- Baumgaertner, B. O., Tyson, R. C., & Krone, S. M. (2016). Opinion strength influences the spatial dynamics of opinion formation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40(4), 207–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2016.1205049
- Beckett, C., & Deuze, M. (2016). On the role of emotion in the future of journalism. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 1–6. https://doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116662395.
- Bouvier, G. (2019). How journalists source trending social media feeds: A critical discourse perspective on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1365618
- Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
- Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., & Coulthard, M. (1996). Preface. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. xi–xii). Routledge.
- Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory. Polity.
- Denver Post. (2018, January 19). Is the #MeToo movement the beginning of a political revolution?, Madhavi, P. https://www.denverpost.com/2018/01/19/is-the-metoo-movement-the-beginning-of-a-political-revolution/
- Ellwardt, L., Labianca, G., & Wittek, R. (2012). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work? A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks, 34(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.003
- Essig, T. (2018). Examples of straight men grappling with the #MeToo movement. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 54(4), 677–687. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2018.1528855
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
- Foreign Affairs. (2018, March 6). How #MeToo Became a Global Movement, Madhavi, P. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-03-06/how-metoo-became-global-movement
- Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Pantheon Books.
- Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media and the public sphere. triple C, 12(1), 57–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552
- Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers.
- The Guardian. (2018, November 11). How MeToo reveled the central rift in feminism today, Donegan, M. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/may/11/how-metoo-revealed-the-central-rift-within-feminism-social-individualist
- Hall Jamieson, K., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford University Press.
- Hindes, S., & Fileborn, B. (2019). “Girl power gone wrong”: #MeToo, Aziz Ansari, and media reporting of (grey area) sexual violence. Feminist Media Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1606843
- The Independent. (2018, October 14). #MeToo is going the way of all other revolutionary movements. O’Doherty, I. https://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/ian-odoherty/metoo-is-going-the-way-of-all-other-revolutionary-movements-37410326.html
- Kane, G. C., Alavi, M., Labianca, G., & Borgatti, S. (2014). What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 275–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13.
- KhosraviNik, M. (2017a). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In J. Flowerdew, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of critical discourse analysis (pp. 582–596). Routledge.
- KhosraviNik, M. (2017b). Right wing populism in the West: Social media discourse and echo chambers. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Majid_Khosravinik/publications
- KhosraviNik, M. (2018). Social media techno-discursive Design, affective communication and contemporary politics. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0226-y
- KhosraviNik, M., & Unger, J. (2015). Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 205–233). Sage.
- KhosraviNik, M., & Zia, M. (2014). Persian Nationalism, identity and anti-Arab Sentiments in Iranian Facebook discourses: Critical discourse analysis and social media communication. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 755–780. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.1.08kho
- Kress, G. (1989). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford University Press.
- Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
- Krzyzanowski, M., & Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the web: Populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 566–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
- Lakoff, G. (2017, September 14). What is Hate Speech? https://georgelakoff.com/2017/09/14/what-is-hate-speech/akademiuppropet/
- Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2018). Doing visual analysis. Sage.
- Lillian, D. L. (2007). A thorn by any other name: Sexist discourse as hate speech. Discourse and Society, 18(6), 738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507082193
- Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). #Metoo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818765318
- Merkin, D. (2018). Fifty Shades of #MeToo. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 54(4), 634–638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2018.1530918
- Myers, G. (2009). The discourse of Blogs and Wikis. Continuum.
- North, A. (2018, October 9). The #MeToo Movement and its Evolution, Explained, Vox. https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/10/9/17933746/me-too-movement-metoo-brett-kavanaugh-weinstein
- Page, R. (2012). The Linguistics of self-branding and Micro-Celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse and Communication, 6(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437441
- Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics and structure of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication and Society, 19(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter Bubble: How the new personalized Web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin Press.
- Renwick Monroe, K. (2019). Ending sexual harassment: Protecting the progress of #MeToo. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 40(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2019.1563422
- Restrepo Sanín, J. (2019). #MeToo what kind of politics? Panel notes. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 40(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2019.1563418
- Rosenberg, B. (2011). The Our House DIY ClubAmateurs, leisure knowledge and lifestyle media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877910382185
- Singh, V. K., & Jain, R. (2010). Structural analysis of the emerging event-web. Proceedings of the 19th International conference on World Wide Web, WWW2010, Raleigh, NC, USA, April 26–30.
- Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
- Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). New forms of writing, new visual competencies. Visual Studies, 23(2), 130–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860802276263
- Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005
- Whillock, R. K. (1995). The use of hate as a stratagem for achieving political and social goals. In R. K. Whillock, & D. Slayden (Eds.), Hate speech (pp. 28–54). Sage.
- Zarkov, D. (2018). Ambiguities and dilemmas around #MeToo: #ForHow long and #WhereTo? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506817749436