The use of the PATH and FORCE image schemas in Barack Obama’s counterterrorism discourse against ISIL

References

• Bhatia, A. (2015). Discursive illusions in public discourse: Theory and practice. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, A. (2018). The discursive construction of terrorism and violence. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 434–446). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. (2010a). What is metaphor and why does it matter? In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 3–25). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. (2010b). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 77–94). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., Low, G., & Maslen, R. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 116–146). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Cap, P. (2014). Applying cognitive pragmatics to critical discourse studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses. Journal of Pragmatics, 70, 16–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2003). Deixis and distance: President Clinton’s justification of intervention in Kosovo. In M. Dedaić & D. Nelson (Eds.), At war with words (pp. 95–126). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2005). Manipulation, memes and metaphors: The case of Mein Kampf. In L. de Saussure & P. Schulz (Eds.), Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century (pp. 15–43). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2006). Metaphors in political discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 8, 2nd ed., pp. 63–65). Elsevier Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2017). Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage et Société, 160-161(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.160.0237
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. In C. Schäffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 37–59). Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, L. (2017). President Obama’s counterterrorism strategy in the war on terror: An assessment. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2017). Mappings and narrative in figurative communication. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 200–219). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H., & Lakoff, G. (2005). Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, F. (2007). Metaphor at work in the analysis of political discourse: Investigating a ‘preventive war’ persuasion strategy. Discourse and Society, 18(5), 603–625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507079737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2016). The FORCE and BALANCE schemas in JOURNEY metaphor animations. In C. Fernandes (Ed.), Multimodality and performance (pp. 8–22). Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2017). From image schema to metaphor in discourse: The force schemas in animation films. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 239–256). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fromson, J., & Simon, S. (2015). ISIS: The dubious paradise of apocalypse now. Survival, 57(3), 7–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2015.1046222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney, F. (2019). Islamic state. In A. Silke (Ed.), Routledge handbook of terrorism and counterterrorism (pp. 315–324). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2005). The psychological status of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 113–136). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs Jr., R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain - metaphor and hidden ideology. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E. (2005). Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning (pp. 35–55). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2016). Discourse, grammar and ideology. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2018). Cognitive linguistic critical discourse studies. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 77–91). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, A. (2011). The “war on terror” narrative: Discourse and intertextuality in the construction and contestation of sociopolitical reality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2005). The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning (pp. 15–33). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2008). Philosophy’s debt to metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs Jr., (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 39–52). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kromhout, R., & Forceville, C. (2013). Life is a journey: Source-path-goal structure in the videogames “Half-Life 2”, “Heavy Rain”, and “Grim Fandango”. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.05for
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maslen, R. (2017). Finding systematic metaphors. In E. Semino,& Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 88–101). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor and persuasion in politics. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 309–322). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez-Perucha, B. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive linguistics as tools for ideological research: A diachronic analysis of feminism. In C. Hart (Ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 97–118). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, M. S. (2008). Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(6), 1041–1066. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña Cervel, S. (1999). Subsidiarity relationship between image – schemas: An approach to the FORCE schema. Journal of English Studies, 1, 187–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.49
   Google Scholar
• Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D. L. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D. L. (2017). Contextual activation of story simulation in metaphor comprehension. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 220–238). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. (2016). Irregular war: The new threat from the margins. I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. (2017). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F., & Velasco, I. D. O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J. (2007). Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Troy, J. (2020). The containment of the Islamic state: A realist case to engage a hybrid actor. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1641345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. The Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velasco-Sacristán, M. (2009). Overtness-covertness in advertising gender metaphors. Journal of English Studies, 7, 111–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.145
   Google Scholar