Race, religion, law: an intertextual micro-genealogy of ‘stirring up hatred’ provisions in England and Wales

References

• Baker, C. E. (1989). Human liberty and freedom of speech. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial Studies, 17(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2014.966414
   Google Scholar
• Box, R., & Simrell King, C. (2000). The ‘T’ruth is elsewhere: Critical history. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 22(4), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2000.11643489
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2008). The racial and religious hatred act 2006: A millian response. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230701880471
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2017). The politics behind the introduction of stirring up religious hatred offences in England and Wales. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 18(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2017.1303770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coliver, S. (1992). Striking a balance: Hate speech, freedom of expression and non-discrimination. Article 19 & Human Rights Centre, University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Dobe, K., & Chhokar, S. (2000). Muslims, ethnicity and the law. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 4(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/135822910000400404
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984a). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76–101). Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984b). Polemics, politics and problematizations: An interview with Michel Foucault. By P. Rabinow. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 381–390). Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2014). What is a ‘history of the present’? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions. Punishment and Society, 16(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514541711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall, K. (2007). Incitement to religious hatred: All talk and no substance? Modern Law Review, 70(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00627.x
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1997). Race, the floating signifier: What more is there to say about race? In P. Gilroy & R. Wilson Gilmore (Eds.), Selected writings on race and difference (pp. 359–373). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, I. (2006). Crosses, crescents and sacred cows: Criminalising incitement to religious hatred. Public Law, (Autumn), 521–538.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, I., & Weinstein, J. (Eds.). (2009). Extreme speech and democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, E. (2006). Viewpoint absolutism and hate speech. Modern Law Review, 69(4), 543–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00599.x
   Google Scholar
• Idriss, M. (2002). Religion and the anti-terrorism, crime and security act 2001. Criminal Law Review, (November), 890–911.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., & Vanderbeck, R. (2014). Law, religion and homosexuality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzman, L. (1988). Power and sex: An interview with Michel Foucault. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984 (pp. 110–124). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission. (2021). Hate crime laws: Final report. Law Com No 402. https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/hate-crime/
   Google Scholar
• Lunny, A. (2017). Hate crime: Language, legislatures and the law in Canada. UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, M., Lawrence, C., Delgado, R., & Williams Crenshaw, K. (Eds.). (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech and the first amendment. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meer, Nasar. (2008). The politics of voluntary and involuntary identities: are Muslims in Britain an ethnic, racial or religious minority?. Patterns of Prejudice, 42(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220701805901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyediran, J. (1992). The United Kingdom’s compliance with article 4 of the international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination. In S. Coliver (Ed.), Striking a balance: Hate speech, freedom of expression and non-discrimination (pp. 245–257). Article 19 & Human Rights Centre, University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. (1997). The ‘racing’ of American society: Race functioning as a verb before signifying as a noun. Law and Inequality, 15(1), 99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, F, Heffer, C, & John, C. (2013). Introduction. In C. Heffer, F. Rock and J. Conley (Ed.), Legal-lay communication: Textual travels in the law. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (2016). To see ourselves: The rhetorical construction of an ideal citizenry in the perorations of twentieth-century budget speeches. British Politics, 12(1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0025-5
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. (2012). Freedom of expression and hatred of religion. Ethnicities, 12(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796811431298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsesis, A. (2009). Dignity and speech: The regulation of hate speech in a democracy. Wake Forest Law Review, 44, 497–532.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. (1994). Critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 5(4), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2012). The harm in hate speech. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2008). Introduction: Discourse studies – important concepts and terms. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.), Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar