Applying the principles of Vivir Bien to a court resolution in Bolivia: language, discourse, and land law

References

• Acosta, A. (2013). El Buen Vivir: Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Icaria & Antrazyt.
   Google Scholar
• Anaya, S. J. (2015). Report of the special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples on extractive industries and indigenous peoples. Arizona Journal International and Comparative Law, 32(1), 110–141. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/33
   Google Scholar
• Anghie, A., & Chimni, B. S. (2003). Third world approaches to international law and individual responsibility in internal conflict. Chinese Journal of International Law, 2(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000480
   Google Scholar
• Bolivia, Plurinational State of. (2009). Constitution. (Max Planck Institute, Trans.). (n.d.) La Paz: Project Constitute, Oxford University Press. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Bolivia_2009?lang = en
   Google Scholar
• Butleritchie, D. T. (2004). The confines of modern constitutionalism. Pierce Law Review, 3(1), 1–32. http://scholars.unh.edu/unh_lr/vol3/iss1/3
   Google Scholar
• Caudillo Félix, G. A. (2012). El Buen Vivir: un diálogo intercultural. Ra-Ximhai, 8(2), 345–354. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=4612336601 https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.08.01.e.2012.14.gc
   Google Scholar
• Chivi Vargas, I. (2010). Constitucionalismo emancipatorio, desarrollo normativo y jurisdicción indígena. In I. Chivi Vargas (Ed.), Bolivia: nueva constitución política del estado – conceptos elementales para su desarrollo normativo (pp. 73–90). Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Clavero, B. S. (2010). Bolivia entre el constitucionalismo colonial y constitucionalismo emancipatorio. In I. Chivi Vargas (Ed.), Bolivia: nueva constitución política del estado – conceptos elementales para su desarrollo normativo (pp. 97–108). Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado Burgoa, R. E. (2010). Algunas reflexiones sobre la Constitución Política del Estado. In I. Chivi Vargas (Ed.), Bolivia: nueva constitución política del estado – conceptos elementales para su desarrollo normativo (pp. 39–55). Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, B. (2000). Crítica de la razón indolente: para un nuevo sentido común: la ciencia, el derecho y la política en la transición paradigmática. Editorial Desclee de Brouwer.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, B. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense. Butterworths Lexis Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dolhare, M. I. (2019). The concept of Vivir Bien (Living Well) and the constitutional recognition of indigenous epistemologies: towards a decolonising legal project [PhD thesis]. The University of Queensland, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2017.31
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in westernized universities: Epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epistemicides of the long 16th century. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 11(1), 73–90. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/humanarchitecture/vol11/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. A., & Wright, R. F. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. California Law Review, 96(1), 63–122. https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/calr96&i=71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huanacuni Mamani, F. (2010). Buen Vivir/Vivir Bien: Filosofía, políticas, estrategias y experiencias regionales andinas. Convenio Andrés Bello. Instituto Internacional de Integración.
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix, L. (2012). Indigenous territoriality and political agenda in Bolivia (1970-2010). Revista de l'Institue Catala d’ Antropologia, 17(1), 60–77. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00738479
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics or racism and antisemitism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Lizana, S. (2019). The discourse of perceived discrimination: Perspectives from contemporary Australian society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Lizana, S., & Dolhare, M. I. (2021). ¿Qué Importa el preámbulo?: pensamiento decolonial en el preámbulo de las constituciones de Bolivia y Ecuador: una aproximación desde el análisis del discurso. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(1), 43–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1567363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira Delgado, A. C. (2018). Suma Qamaña as a strategy of power: Politicizing the pluriverse. Rev. Carta Inter. Belo Horizonte, 13(3), 236–261. https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v13n3.2018.818
   Google Scholar
• Viciano Pastor, R., & Martínez Dalmau, R. (2010). Los procesos constituyentes latinoamericanos y el nuevo paradigma constitucional. IUS. Revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, 25(4), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v4i25.2010.214
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2011). The right to free, prior, and informed consent: Indigenous peoples’ participation rights within international law. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 10(2), 54–84. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol10/iss2/2
   Google Scholar
• Westman, I. (2013). ‘We value it because it is only on the earth that you can put your feet’ – A case study of landscape values and perspectives in the Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro Secure highway conflict [Bachelor's thesis]. University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar