The Magna Carta of Women as the Philippine Translation of the CEDAW: A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis

References

• Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2075528 https://doi.org/10.2307/2075528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldez, L. (2011). The un convention to eliminate all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW): A new way to measure women’s interests. Politics & Gender, 7(3), 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bemiller, M. L., & Schneider, R. Z. (2010). It’s not just a joke. Sociological Spectrum, 30(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732171003641040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicameral Conference Committee on the Disagreeing Provisions of House Bill 4273 and Senate Bill 2396 Re Magna Carta of Women. (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, M., & Kaplan, J. (1995). The tension between women’s rights and religious rights: Reservations to CEDAW by Egypt, Bangladesh and Tunisia. Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 105–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051612
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S. (2013). Negotiating gendered institutions: Women's parliamentary friendships. Politics & Gender, 9(2013), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000019
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, J. (2018). Feminist innovations and New institutionalism. In M. Sawer & K. Baker (Eds.), Gender innovation in political science. Gender and politics. (pp. 115–133). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75850-3_6
   Google Scholar
• Draude, A. (2017). Translation in motion: A concept’s journey towards norm diffusion studies. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 2(5), 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2017.1436984
   Google Scholar
• Englehart, N. A., & Miller, M. K. (2014). The CEDAW effect: International law’s impact on women’s rights. Journal of Human Rights, 13(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2013.824274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, M. (2007). Gender, institutions and power: A critical review. Politics, 27(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00284.x
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. M. (2000). Gender, discourse and semiotics: The politics of parenthood representations. Discourse & Society, 11(3), 373–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. M. (2005a). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. M. (2005b). Politicizing gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis. Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, M. M. (2014). Feminist critical discourse analysis. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff, & J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 180–199). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, D. J., & Zwingel, S. (2014). Gender equality oversimplified: Using CEDAW to counter the measurement obsession. International Studies Review, 16(3), 362–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). Concealing and taking for granted: Nominalization and presupposition. In How to do critical discourse analysis (pp. 137–162).
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, F., Kenny, M., & Chappell, L. (2010). New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31(5), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110388788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, F., & Waylen, G. (2009). Feminist institutionalism. Politics & Gender, 5(02), 237–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09000178
   Google Scholar
• Minto, R., & Mergaert, L. (2018). Gender mainstreaming and evaluation in the EU: Comparative perspectives from feminist institutionalism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1440181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee on Women, Philippine House of Representatives, 27 November 2007. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Austria, C. S. (2004). The church, the state and women’s bodies in the context of religious fundamentalism in the Philippines. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24152-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savery, L. (2007). Engendering the state: The international diffusion of women’s human rights. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shalev, C. (2000). Rights to sexual and reproductive health: The ICPD and the convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against women. Health and Human Rights, 4(2), 38–66. http://www.jstor.com/stable/4065196 https://doi.org/10.2307/4065196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel, N. S., & Siegel, R. B. (2015). Struck by stereotype : Ruth bader ginsburg on pregnancy discrimination as sex discrimination. The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 59(4), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477131.006
   Google Scholar
• Tanyag, M. (2015). Unravelling the intersections of power: The case of sexual and reproductive freedom in the Philippines. Women's Studies International Forum, 53, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. (2018). Resisting gendered change: Feminist institutionalism and critical actors. International Political Science Review, 39(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116677844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. M. (2003). Interpreting Islam and Women’s Rights: Implementing CEDAW in Pakistan. International Sociology, 18(3), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809030183007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwingel, S. (2012). How Do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational Perspective1. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00701.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwingel, S. (2013). Translating international women’s rights norms: CEDAW in context. In Feminist strategies in international governance (pp. 111–126). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094969
   Google Scholar
• Zwingel, S. (2016). Translating international women’s rights: The CEDAW convention in context. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-31501-4
   Google Scholar