Living Rooms Occupied: Narratives on the Recontextualization of the “Museum-Salon” Practice in Modern Turkish Domesticity

REFERENCES

• Akcan, Esra. 2012. Architecture in Translation: Germany, Turkey, and the Modern House. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
   Google Scholar
• Ariès, Phillipe. 1962. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, Judy. 2000. Wild Things: The Material Culture of Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, Judy. 2007. Bringing Modernity Home: Writings on Popular Design and Material Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayata, S. 1988. “Kentsel Orta Sınıf Ailelerde Statü Yarışması ve Salon Kullanımı.” [Living Room Use and Status Rivalry in Urban Middle Class Families].” Toplum ve Bilim 42 (Summer): 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Birdwell-Pheasant, Donna, and Denise Lawrence-Zuniga. 1999. House Life: Space, Place and Family in Europe. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Balı, Rıfat. 2002. Tarz-ı Hayattan Life Style’a: Yeni Seçkinler, Yeni Mekanlar, Yeni Yaşamlar. [from Tarz-ı Hayat to Lifestyle: New Elite, New Spaces, New Lives]. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bozdoğan, Sibel. 2001. Modernizm ve Ulusun İnşası [Modernism and Nation Building]. Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, David. 1999. Yaşam Tarzları [Lifestyles]. Translated by I. Kutluk. Ankara: Dost Yayınevi.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Clare. 1974. “The House as Symbol of the Self.” In Jon Lang (ed.), Designing for Human Behavior, edited by. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, I. 1951. “The South Bank Exhibition: A Guide to the Story it Tells. p. 72. London: HMO.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, Elizabeth Collins. 1990. Alone together: A history of New York early apartments. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çapoğlu, N. 2008. “Home as a Place: The Making of Domestic Space at Yeşiltepe Blocks, Ankara.” Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Dellaloğlu, Besim F. 2016. Modernleşmenin Zihniyet Dünyası: Bir Tanpınar Fetişizmi [Mentality Realm of Modernization: A Tanpınar Fetishism]. İstanbul: Kadim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Denby, Elizabeth. 1944. Europe-Rehoused. London: Allen&Unwin
   Google Scholar
• Duben, Alen, and Cem Behar. 2002. Istanbul Households: Marriage, Family and Fertility, 1880-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallan, Kjetil. 2010. Design History: Understanding Theory and Method. Oxford: Berg Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, Mike. 1996. Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Kültürü [Postmodernism and Consumer Culture]. Translated by Mehmet Küçük. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Göçek, Fatma M. 1987. East Encounters West: France and the Ottoman Empire in the Eighteenth Century (Studies in Middle Eastern History). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göle, Nilüfer. 2014. “Modern Mahrem: Medeniyet ve Örtünme [the Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling].”International Affairs 73 (4): 788–789.
   Google Scholar
• Grier, Katherine C. 1988. Culture and Comfort: Parlor Making and Middle-Class identity, 1850-1930. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grow, Lawrence, ed. 1980. The Old House Book of Living Rooms and Parlors. New York: Main Street Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gürel, Meltem Ö. 2007. “Domestic Space, Modernity, and Identity: The Apartment in Mid-20th Century Turkey.” PhD Diss., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Gürel, Meltem Ö. 2009. “Consumption of Modern Furniture as a Strategy of Distinction in Turkey.” Journal of Design History 22 (1): 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Gürel, Meltem Ö. 2016. Designing and Consuming the Modern. In F. Fisher and P. Sparke (eds.), Routledge Companion to Design Studies, [pp. 457–468]. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Lane, Elizabeth. 2009. “Domestic Modernism in Middle America: Midwestern Women in their Postwar Homes. Wisconsin, Madison: A. S. Martin.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, Deniz. 2005. Giriş: Parçaları Yorumlamak. InIçinde D. Kandiyoti, A. Saktanber (Der.), Kültür Fragmanları: Türkiye’de Gündelik Hayat (3. Baskı,s. 15-36). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Keyder, Çaglar. 2000. İstanbul Küresel ile Yerel Arasında [Istanbul between the Global and the Local]. İstanbul: Metis Yayınevi.
   Google Scholar
• Kıray, M. 2006. Toplumsal Yapı Toplumsal Değişme [Social Structure and Social Change]. Istanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, Edward O., and James S. House. 1970. “Living Room Styles and Social Attributes: The Patterning on Material Artifacts in a Modern Urban Community.” In Edward O. Laumann, Paul M. Siegel, and Robert W. Hodge (eds.), The Logic of Social Hierarchies, [pp. 321–342]. Chicago, IL: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Mardin, Şerif. 1974. Super Westernization in Urban Life in the Ottoman Empire in the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth Century. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Daniel, ed. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nasır, E. 2016a. “An Investigation of Transformation of Living Room Furniture: The Idea of Living Room, Furniture Acquirement Dyamics and Use Practices.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Nasır, E. 2016b. “Searching for the Vernacular Concepts in the Contemporary Scene: The Turkish Floor Table as a Source of Design Inspiration.” International Journal of Food Design 1(2): 135–158.
   Google Scholar
• Onur, Z., N. Bayraktar, and H. Sağlam. 2001. “Konutun Kullanım Sürecine İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme” [An Evaluation of Housing Usage Lifespan].”G.U.Journal of Science 14 (2): 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Öncel, Ayse Derin. 2010. Apartman: Galata’da Yeni bir Konut Tipi (Apartment: a New Dwelling Type in Galata). İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi.
   Google Scholar
• Öncü, Ayse. 1997. “The Myth of the ‘Ideal HOME’: Travels across Cultural Borders in Istanbul.” In Ayse Öncü and Petra Weyland (ed.), Space, Culture and Power. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Özbay, Ferhunde. 1999. “Gendered Space: A New Look at Turkish Modernisation.” Gender & History 11 (3): 555–568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Özkaya, Gökçen A. 2016. 18. Yüzyılda İstanbul Evleri [Istanbul Houses in 18th Century]. İstanbul: İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü.
   Google Scholar
• Özsoy, A., and G. Gökmen. 2005. “Space Use, Dwelling Layout and Housing Quality: An Example of Low-Cost Housing in İstanbul.” In Ricardo Garcia-Mira, David L. Uzzell, J. Eulogio Real, and José Romay (eds.), Housing, Space and Quality of Life, [pp. 17–27]. Aldershot, Hants, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Paavilainen, Heidi, Petra Ahde-Deal, and Ilpo Koskinen. 2017. “Dwelling with Design.” The Design Journal: An International Journal for All Aspects of Design 20 (1): 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pamuk, Orhan. 2006. Istanbul: Memories and the City. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rechavi, Talya B. 2009. “A Room for Living: Private and Public Aspects in the Experience of the Living Room.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(1): 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybczynski, Witold. 1986. Home: A Short History of an Idea. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, Qassim. 2013. “Framework for Re-Visioning Design in Iraq.” Ph.D. thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Sancar, Nuray, Ulaş B. Gezgin, and İnal Kemal. 2015. Marka Takva Tuğra [Brand, Piety, Tughra]. İstanbul: Evrensel Basım Yayın.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg. 1903. “The metropolis and mental life.” In Kurt H. Wolff (ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel, [p. 409–424]. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, Penny, Anne Massey, Trevor Keeble, and Brenda Martin. (eds.). 2009. Designing the Modern Interior: From the Victorians to Today. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Tanyeli, Uğur. 2004. İstanbul 1900-2000: Konutu ve Modernleşmeyi Metropolden Okumak [Interpreting Dwelling and Modernization from Metropol]. İstanbul: Akın Nalça Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Tanyeli, Uğur. 2011. “Rüya, İnşa, İtiraz: Mimari Eleştiri Metinleri” [Dream, Construction, Objection: Architectural Criticism Texts]. İstanbul: Boyut Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Tanyeli, Uğur. 2013. İstanbul’da Mekan Mahremiyeti’nin İhlali ve Teşhiri [Transgression and Display of Spatial Privacy in Istanbul]. İstanbul: Akın Nalça Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Toprak, Zafer. 2007. “From Plurality to Unity.” In Anna Frangoudaki and Çağlar Keyder (eds.), Ways to Modernity in Greece and Turkey: Encounters with Europe, 1850-1950. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, Sarah J. 2013. Qualitative Research Methods. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Bryan S. 1988. Status. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulver-Sneistrup, Sofia. 2008. Status Spotting: A Consumer Cultural Exploration into Ordinary Status Consumption of ‘Home’ and Home Aesthetics. Lund: Lund Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uşaklıgil, H. 1884. “Tuvalet Masası ve Sünger.” [Dressing Table and Sponge].” Nevruz 1, 13 March 1884.
   Google Scholar
• Üstüner, Tuba and Holt, Douglas B. 2010. “Toward a Theory of Status Consumption in Less Industrialized Countries.” Journal of Consumer Research 37: 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Lloyd W. 1949. Democracy in jonesville: a study in quality and inequality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, K., and A. Başkaya. 2006. “Farklı sosyo-ekonomik düzeye sahip kullanıcıların konut ana yaşama mekanını değerlendirmesi” [Evaluation of Main Living Spaces of Householders from Different Socio-Economic Strata.”]. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 1(2): 285–292.
   Google Scholar
• Ziya, Mimar Abdullah. 1931. Arkitekt. (1931 (1): 14–20). In Umut Şumnu (ed.), Erken Cumhuriyer Döneminde Mobilya [Furniture in the Early Republican Era]. Ankara: TMMOB İçmimarlar Odası.
   Google Scholar