The Battle of the Balconies—Scandinavian Sameness and Urban-Domestic Boundaries

References

• Andersen, H.S. 2002. “Excluded Places: The Interaction between Segregation, Urban Decay and Deprived Neighbourhoods.” Housing, Theory and Society 19(3–4): 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Bech-Danielsen, C. 2004. Moderne arkitektur—hva’ er meningen? Århus: Systime.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1979. Algeria 1960: The Disenchantment of the World: The Sense of Honour: The Kabyle House or The World Reversed: Essays, R. Nice (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, I. 2008. “Japanese Homes Inside and Out.” Home Cultures 5(2): 115–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1965. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, P. 2005. “Domestic Boundaries: Privacy, Visibility and the Norwegian Window.” Journal of Material Culture 10(2): 157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1990 [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad, M. 1991. “The Scandinavian Version of Egalitarian Individualism.” Ethnologia Scandinavia 21: 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad, M. 2002. “Invisible Fences: Egalitarianism, Nationalism and Racism.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8(1): 45–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. 2019. Gardin eller ej gardin—det er spørgsmålet. Skraeppebladet 3. Maj 2019. Retrieved from https://skraeppebladet.dk/blad/2019-03/artikler/gardin-eller-ej-gardin-det-er-spoergsmaalet/
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and M. Gabriel. 2013. “Introduction: Homes, Objects and Things.” Housing, Theory and Society 30(3): 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and J. Malpas. 2013. “Material Objects, Identity and the Home: Towards a Relational Housing Research Agenda.” Housing, Theory and Society 30(3): 281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, M. L. E., and S. B. Jensen. 2017. “They Want us Out’: Urban Regeneration and the Limits of Integration in the Danish Welfare State.” Critique of Anthropology 37(3): 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., and E. Makarova. 2008. “The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space.” Sociological Theory 26(4): 324–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolhaas, R. 2018. Elements of Architecture: Floor, Ceiling, Roof, Door, Wall, Stair, Toilet, Window, Façade, Balcony, Corridor, Fireplace, Ramp, Escalator, Elevator. Cologne: Taschen.
   Google Scholar
• Kopytoff, I. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as a Process. In Appadurai A (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. NY: Cambridge University Press: 64–92.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, B.R. 2011. “Becoming Part of Welfare Scandinavia: Integration through the Spatial Dispersal of Newly Arrived Refugees in Denmark.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37(2): 333–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren, O. 2003. The Sweetness of Home: Class, Culture and Family Life in Sweden. In Low SM and Lawrence-Zúniga D (Eds.) The Anthropology of Space and Place. Locating Culture. London: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mandich, G., and V. Cuzzocrea. 2016. “Domesticating’ the City: Family Practices in Public Space.” Space and Culture 19(3): 224–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. A. 2017. “Dwelling Together: Observable Traces and Controls in Residential Urban Spaces.” Space and Culture 20(1): 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olwig, K.F., and K. Paerregaard. 2011. The Question of Integration: Immigration. Exclusion and the Danish Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oz, I., and A. Staub. 2019. “Fieldwork in-between Architecture and Anthropology.” ARCC Conference Repository 1(1): 288–297.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2003. “Mobile Transformations of ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ Life.” Theory, Culture & Society 20(3): 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stender, M., Bech-Danielsen, C., and Landsverk-Hagen, A. (Eds.). 2022. Architectural Anthropology: Exploring Lived Space. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stender, M., and Jepsen, M. B. 2021. An outdoor living room—balconies and blurring boundaries. In Stender M, Bech-Danielsen C, and Landsverk-Hagen A (Eds.) Architectural anthropology—exploring lived space, pp. 48–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stender, M., and C. Bech-Danielsen. 2019. “Bridging Social Gaps: Transforming Disadvantaged Areas by Linking Them to the City.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 31(1): 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Stender, M. 2016. “Towards an Architectural Anthropology: What Architects Can Learn from Anthropology and Vice Versa.” Architectural Theory Review 21(1): 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stender, M. 2006. Om at bo i glashus. En antropologisk analyse af rum, synliggørelse
   Google Scholar
• Trafik, Bygge og Boligstyrelsen. 2019. [Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority] Udviklingsplan for Gellerup og Toveshøj [Development plan for Gellerup and Toveshøj] https://helhedsplangellerup.dk/media/48231/udviklingsplan-for-gellerup-og-toveshoej.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Deurs, C. R. 2010. Uderum—udeliv. Udformning og brug af uderum i nyere dansk boligbyggeri. Copenhagen: PhD thesis from the Royal Danish Academy of Arts, School of Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Westman, B. 1974. Arkitektur: Tid og rum. Nogle tanker over forholdet mellem bolig og bebyggelse anvendt på antropologisk erfaringsmateriale. Copenhagen: Kunstakademiets arkitektskole, Laboratoriet for boligbyggeri.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A., and L. Heaphy. 2012. “Urban Controversies and the Making of the Social.”Architectural Research Quarterly 16(1): 29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar