Homely Orderings in Times of Stay-At-Home Measures

REFERENCES

• Alam, A., and D. Houston. 2020. “Rethinking Care as Alternate Infrastructure.” Cities 100: 102662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacher, J. 2020. “20% der Kinder in Österreich leben in beengten Wohnverhältnissen.” Available from: https://viecer.univie.ac.at/corona-blog/corona-blog-beitraege/blog05/. [Accessed October 3, 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Berghammer, C. 2020a. Wie gut gelingt Homeschooling in der Corona-Krise? Vienna: University of Vienna. Available from: https://viecer.univie.ac.at/corona-blog/corona-blog-beitraege/blog47/. [Accessed May 28, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Berghammer, C. 2020b. Work-Family-Konflikt in der Corona-Krise. Vienna: University of Vienna. Available from: https://viecer.univie.ac.at/corona-blog/corona-blog-beitraege/blog25/. [Accessed April 29, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Berghammer, C. 2022. “Childcare and Housework during the First Lockdown in Austria: Traditional Division or New Roles?” Journal of Family Research 34(1): 99–133.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, B. 2008. “Heimat als Begriff der Gegenwartsanalyse? Gefühle der Zugehörigkeit und Soziale Imaginationen in der Auseinandersetzung um Einwanderung.” Zeitschrift für Volkskunde 104(1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Birdwell-Pheasant, D. and D. Lawrence-Zúñiga (eds.). 1999. House Life. Space, Place and Family in Europe. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Buschmeyer, A., R. Ahrens, and C. Zerle-Elsäßer. 2021. “Wo ist das (Gute) Alte Leben Hin? Doing Family und Vereinbarkeitsmanagement in der Corona-Krise.”Gender 13(2): 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. 2017. Migration and the Search for Home. Mapping Domestic Space in Migrants’ Everyday Lives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P., and M. Kusenbach. 2020. “For a Comparative Sociology of Home: Relationships, Cultures, Structures.” Current Sociology 68(5): 595–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1970. “The Berber House or the World Reversed.” Social Science Information 9(2): 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, S., and E. Jupp. 2021. “Home, Inequalities and Care: Perspectives from within a Pandemic.” International Journal of Housing Policy 21(3): 423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. 2020. Informationen für Eltern und Erziehungsberechtigte. Wien: Bundesministerium Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, C., and A. Fábos. 2015. “Making Homes in Limbo? A Conceptual Framework.” Refuge 31(1): 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bührig, S., and B. Kniess. 2016. “Wohnen ist Gestalten.” In Wohnbund e.V., HafenCity Universität Hamburg (ed.), Wohnen ist Tat – Sache. Annäherungen an Eine Urbane Praxis, [pp. 132–134]. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, S. 2021. “The Pandemic of Productivity. The Work of Home and the Work from Home. Anthropology in Action.” Berghahn Journals 28(1): 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cieraad, I. (ed.). 1999. At Home. An Anthropology of Domestic Space. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cwerner, S., and A. Metcalfe. 2003. “Storage and Clutter. Discourses and Practices of Order in the Domestic World.” Journal of Design History 16(3): 229–239.
   Google Scholar
• Czymara, C. S., A. Langenkamp, and T. Cano. 2021. “Cause for Concerns: gender Inequality in Experiencing the COVID-19 Lockdown in Germany.” European Societies 23 (sup1): S68–S81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J., and D. Pontille. 2015. “Material Ordering and the Care of Things.” Science, Technology and Human Values 40(3): 338–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derndorfer, J., F. Disslbacher, V. Lechinger, K. Mader, and E. Six. 2021. “Home, Sweet Home? The Impact of Working from Home on the Division of Unpaid Work during the COVID-19 Lockdown.” PLoS ONE 16(11): e0259580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Der Standard. 2020. “Möbelriese XXXLutz kann sich Teil-Lockdown für Österreich vorstellen.” Der Standard, https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000121275471/moebelhaendler-xxxlutz-kann-sich-deutschen-teil-lockdown-fuer-oesterreich-vorstellen. [Accessed October 29, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1991. “The Idea of a Home: A Kind of Space.” Social Research 58(1): 287–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehn, B., O. Löfgren, and R. Wilk. 2016. Exploring Everyday Life. Strategies for Ethnography and Cultural Analysis. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1970. The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the College De France, 1977–1978. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, H., B. Laa, U. Leth, F. Kratochwil, and P. Schober. 2020. Mobilität in Wien unter COVID19. Begleituntersuchung. Temporäre Begegnungszonen und Pop-Up Radinfrastruktur. Vienna: Technical University of Vienna. Available form: https://www.mobilitaetsagentur.at/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/COVID19_Mobilitaet_Wien_Endbericht_final_20201207_freyha.pdf. [Accessed December 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Grunow, D., K. Begall, and S. Buchler. 2018. “Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multimensional Framework.”Journal of Marriage and the Family 80(1): 42–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hank, K., and A. Steinbach. 2021. “The Virus Changed Everything, Didn’t It? Couples’ Division of Housework and Childcare before and during the Corona Crisis.” Journal of Family Research 33(1): 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Häußermann, H., and W. Siebel. 2000. Soziologie des Wohnens. Eine Einführung in Wandel und Ausdifferenzierung des Wohnens. Weinheim: Juventa-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., J. Mattes, and A. Shook. 2021. “When Paid Work Invades the Family: Single Mothers in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Family Issues 42(9): 2019–2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen, H., and B. Gülsum (ed.) 2005. Negotiating Domesticity. Spacial Productions of Gender in Modern Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2022. “Looking at the ‘Field’ through a Zoom Lens: Methodological Reflections on Conducting Online Research during a Global Pandemic.” Qualitative Research 22(3): 387–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörning, K. 2000. Experten des Alltags: Die wiederentdeckung des Praktischen Wissens. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
   Google Scholar
• Invenium Data Insights GmbH. 2020. “Österreich Bleibt Daheim.” Invenium Data Insights GmbH. Available from: https://www.invenium.io/de/blog/2020-04-02-oesterreich-bleibt-daheim/ [Accessed April 2, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J. 2014. “Rethinking Repair.” In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, and K. A. Foot (eds.), Media Technologies. Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, [pp. 221–239]. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jianghong, L., M. Bünning, T. Kaiser, and L. Hipp. 2022. “Who Suffered Most? Parental Stress and Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.” Journal of Family Research 34(1): 281–309.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N., S. Razavi, and Y. van der Meulen Rodgers. 2021. “Feminist Economic Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Feminist Economics 27(1–2): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleitner, F., and J. Partheymüller. 2021. “New Work, New Inequality: Wer Arbeitet im Homeoffice?” Available from: https://viecer.univie.ac.at/corona-blog/corona-blog-beitraege/blog121/. [Accessed October 3, 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Kelle, U., and S. Kluge 2010. Vom Einzelfall zum Typus. Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, M., and S. Zinn. 2021. “Coronavirus and Care: How the Coronavirus Crisis Affected Fathers’ Involvement in Germany.” Demographic Research 44(4): 99–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. 2003. “Street Phenomenology. The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool.” Ethnography 4(3): 455–485.
   Google Scholar
• Langenkamp, A., T. Cano, and C. Czymara. 2021. “My Home is My Castle? The Role of Living Arrangements on Experiencing the COVID-19 Pandemic. Evidence from Germany.” Frontiers in Sociology 6: 785201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lessenich, S. 2020. “Allein Solidarisch?” In: M. Volkmer and K. Werner (eds.), Die Corona-Gesellschaft, [pp. 177–184]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren, O. 1990. “The Home Builders.” In: J. Frykman and O. Löfgren (eds.), Culture Builders. A Historical Anthropology of Middle-Class Life, [pp. 88–153]. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren, O. 2017. “Mess: On Domestic Overflows.” Consumption Markets & Culture 20(1): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., M. Munro, and S. J. Smith. 1990. “Gender and the Meaning of the Home.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 14(4): 625–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, S. 2004. “Understanding Home: A Critical Review of the Literature.” The Sociological Review 52(1): 62–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. 2018. “Maintenance and Care.” Places Journal. [Accessed 02 Dec 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Märtsin, M., and T. Nitt. 2005. “The Home as a Territorial System (II).” In G. M. Ricardo, D. L. Uzzell, E. J. Real, and J. Romay (eds.), Housing, Space and Quality of Life, [pp. 151–171]. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011. “The City as Assemblage. Dwelling and Urban Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29(4): 649–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2001. “Behind Closed Doors.” In D. Miller (ed.), Home Possessions. Material Culture behind Closed Doors, [pp. 1–19]. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., and R. Bartlett. 2019. “Solicited Diary Methods.” In: P. Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, [pp. 1447–1464]. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• News. 2020. “Ist es eine Schande, sein Kind abzugeben?” News. https://www.news.at/a/kurz-schande-kinderbetreuung-corona-11458713. [Accessed October 29, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., M. K. Leder, R. Moroşanu, V. Mitchell, and T. Bhamra. 2020. Making Homes. Ethnography and Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power, K. 2020. “The COVID-19 Pandemic Has Increased the Care Burden of Women and Families.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16(1): 67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience. Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2003. “Grundelemente Einer Theorie Sozialer Praktiken. Eine Sozialtheoretische Perspektive.”Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32(4): 282–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel, A., and L. Vinsel. 2018. “After Innovation, Turn to Maintenance.” Technology and Culture 59(1): 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvis, D. 2022. “Cherished World Thinking: Devoloping a Maintenance Mindset in Family Caregiving Contexts.” Cognition and Instruction 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevano, S., A. Mezzadri, L. Lombardozzi, and H. Bargawi. 2021. “Hidden Abodes in Plain Sight: The Social Reproduction of Households and Labor in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Feminist Economics 27(1–2): 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waismel-Manor, R., V. Wasserman, and O. Shamir-Balderman. 2021. “No Room of Her Own. Married Couples’ Negotiation of Workspace at Home during COVID-19.” Sex Roles 85(11–12): 636–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, J. 1997. “The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction.” In J. Weintraub and K. Krishan (eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice. Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, [pp. 1–42]. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werron, T., and L. Ringel. 2020. “Pandemic Practices, Part One. How to Turn ‘Living through the COVID-19 Pandemic’ into a Heuristic Tool for Sociological Theorizing.” Sociologica 14(2): 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Winther, I. W. 2009. “Homing Oneself. Home as a Practice.” Haecceity Papers 4(2): 49–83.
   Google Scholar
• Yavorsky, J. E., Y. Qian, and A. C. Sargent. 2021. “The Gendered Pandemic: The Implications of COVID-19 for Work and Family.” Sociology Compass 15(6): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zartler, U., P. Dirnberger, V. Dafert, S. Harter, and D. Schimek. 2021. Corona: Arbeit und Care. Forschungsbericht. Vienna: Institut für Soziologie und Arbeiterkammer Wien. Available from: https://cofam.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_cofam/Corona_Arbeit_und_Care_Endbericht.pdf. [Accessed June 2021].
   Google Scholar