Controlling the display of videos in a physical education context: effects on learning outcomes and situational interest

References

• Aiken, C. A., J. T. Fairbrother, and P. G. Post. 2012. “The Effects of Self-Controlled Video Feedback on the Learning of the Basketball Set Shot.” Frontiers in Psychology 3: 338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. 1987. “Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-Method Problem Situations.” Psychological Review 94 (2): 192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1993. “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.” Educational Psychologist 28 (2): 117–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berney, S., and M. Bétrancourt. 2016. “Does Animation Enhance Learning? A Meta-Analysis.” Computers & Education 101: 150–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biard, N., S. Cojean, and E. Jamet. 2018. “Effects of Segmentation and Pacing on Procedural Learning by Video.” Computers in Human Behavior 89: 411–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. 1996. “Self-regulated Learning at the Junction of Cognition and Motivation.” European Psychologist 1 (2): 100–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., P. W. Darst, and R. P. Pangrazi. 1999. “What Constitutes Situational Interest? Validating a Construct in Physical Education.” Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 3 (3): 157–163.
   Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., and G. Wulf. 2005. “Self-controlled Feedback is Effective If It is Based on the Learner's Performance.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 76 (1): 42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The” What” and” Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education, UK. 2013. “National Curriculum in England: Physical Education Programs of Study.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-englandphysical-education-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-physical-educationprogrammes-of-study.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, B., and A. Casey. 2012. “Introduction: Cooperative Learning as a Pedagogical Model in Physical Education.” In Cooperative Learning in Physical Education, edited by A. Casey, 17–28. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Rio, J., N. Sanz, J. Fernandez-Cando, and L. Santos. 2017. “Impact of a Sustained Cooperative Learning Intervention on Student Motivation.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 22 (1): 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gréhaigne, J. F., and P. Godbout. 1995. “Tactical Knowledge in Team Sports from a Constructivist and Cognitivist Perspective.” Quest 47 (4): 490–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasler, B. S., B. Kersten, and J. Sweller. 2007. “Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation.” Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 21 (6): 713–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, A., and K. Lonka. 2006. “Studying in Higher Education: Students’ Approaches to Learning, Self-Regulation, and Cognitive Strategies.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (1): 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., and V. Anderson. 1992. “Situational Interest and Its Impact on Reading and Expository Writing.” In The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, edited by K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, and A. Krapp, 215–238. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., and K. A. Renninger. 2006. “The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H’mida, C., O. Degrenne, N. Souissi, G. Rekik, K. Trabelsi, M. Jarraya, N. L. Bragazzi, et al. 2020. “Learning a Motor Skill from Video and Static Pictures in Physical Education Students—Effects on Technical Performances, Motivation and Cognitive Load.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (23): 9067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., and R. N. Schwartz. 2011. “Effects of Pacing and Cognitive Style Across Dynamic and Non-Dynamic Representations.” Computers & Education 57 (2): 1716–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle, C. M., D. A. Barba, S. G. Frehlich, L. K. Tennant, and J. H. Cauraugh. 1997. “Maximizing Performance Feedback Effectiveness Through Videotape Replay and a Self-Controlled Learning Environment.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 68 (4): 269–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khacharem, A. 2013. “Apprentissage de scènes de football animées: effet des designs pédagogiques et de l'expertise.” Thèse, université d’Aix-Marseille.
   Google Scholar
• Khacharem, A., I. A. Spanjers, B. Zoudji, S. Kalyuga, and H. Ripoll. 2013. “Using Segmentation to Support the Learning from Animated Soccer Scenes: An Effect of Prior Knowledge.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 14 (2): 154–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khacharem, A., B. Zoudji, and S. Kalyuga. 2015a. “Expertise Reversal for Different Forms of Instructional Designs in Dynamic Visual Representations.” British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (4): 756–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khacharem, A., B. Zoudji, and S. Kalyuga. 2015b. “Perceiving Versus Inferring Movements to Understand Dynamic Events: The Influence of Content Complexity.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 19: 70–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khacharem, A., B. Zoudji, I. A. Spanjers, and S. Kalyuga. 2014. “Improving Learning from Animated Soccer Scenes: Evidence for the Expertise Reversal Effect.” Computers in Human Behavior 35: 339–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., and A. MacPhail. 2002. “Teaching Games for Understanding and Situated Learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21 (2): 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., S. Hidi, and A. Renninger. 1992. “Interest, Learning and Development.” In The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, edited by R. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, and A. Krapp, 3–25. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, C. 2018. “The Relationship Between System-Provided Learner Control and Maintained Situational Interest Within Elearning Courses.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 15 (3): 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., and R. K. Atkinson. 2011. “Using Animations and Visual Cueing to Support Learning of Scientific Concepts and Processes.” Computers & Education 56 (3): 650–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., A. M. Durik, A. M. Conley, K. E. Barron, J. M. Tauer, S. A. Karabenick, and J. M. Harackiewicz. 2010. “Measuring Situational Interest in Academic Domains.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 70 (4): 647–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, R. K. 2003. “Animation and Learning: Selective Processing of Information in Dynamic Graphics.” Learning and Instruction 13 (2): 157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, J., and D. Tannehill. 2015. Standards-based Physical Education Curriculum Development. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Magill, R. 2011. Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Magill, R., and D. Anderson. 2010. Motor Learning and Control. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, N., B. Cleary, A. Wong, and P. Ayres. 2013. “Should Hand Actions be Observed When Learning Hand Motor Skills from Instructional Animations?” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (6): 2172–2178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslovat, D., and I. M. Franks. 2015. “The Importance of Feedback to Performance.” In Essentials of Performance Analysis in Sport, edited by M. Hughes and I. M. Franks, 11–17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2005. “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by R. Mayer, 31–48. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2014. “Incorporating Motivation Into Multimedia Learning.” Learning and Instruction 29: 171–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and P. Chandler. 2001. “When Learning is Just a Click Away: Does Simple User Interaction Foster Deeper Understanding of Multimedia Messages?” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2): 390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S., S. A. Mitchell, J. Oslin, and L. L. Griffin. 2020. Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. 2005. “Instructional Technology: Promise and Pitfalls.” In Technology-based Education: Bringing Researchers and Practitioners Together, edited by L. Pytlik Zillig, M. Bodvarsson, and R. Bruning, 1–19. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. 2006. “Does the Modality Principle Hold for Different Media? A Test of the Method-Affects-Learning Hypothesis.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22: 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., and R. Mayer. 2007. “Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (3): 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbit, J. C., and O. O. Adesope. 2011. “Learning from Animated Concept Maps with Concurrent Audio Narration.” The Journal of Experimental Education 79 (2): 209–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, H. K., S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller. 2013. “Reducing Transience During Animation: a Cognitive Load Perspective.” Educational Psychology 33 (7): 755–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin, J., D. N. Chróinín, and D. O’Grady. 2013. “Digital Video: The Impact on Children’s Learning Experiences in Primary Physical Education.” European Physical Education Review 19 (2): 165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasco, D., and C. Roure. 2019. “Impact of a Technology-Based Physical Education Learning Task on Ninth Grade Students’ Situational Interest.” In Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, edited by F. Taylor, 69–70. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12162/3318.
   Google Scholar
• Pedra, A., R. E. Mayer, and A. L. Albertin. 2015. “Role of Interactivity in Learning from Engineering Animations.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 29 (4): 614–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potdevin, F., O. Vors, A. Huchez, M. Lamour, K. Davids, and C. Schnitzler. 2018. “How Can Video Feedback be Used in Physical Education to Support Novice Learning in Gymnastics? Effects on Motor Learning, Self-Assessment and Motivation.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 23 (6): 559–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekik, G., A. Khacharem, Y. Belkhir, N. Bali, and M. Jarraya. 2019. “The Instructional Benefits of Dynamic Visualizations in the Acquisition of Basketball Tactical Actions.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35 (1): 74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., S. Hidi, and A. Krapp, eds. 1992. The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roure, C. 2019. “Impact des Technologies Numériques sur la Motivation des élèves en éducation Physique au Sein du Style D’enseignement par la Découverte Guidée.” eJRIEPS. Ejournal de la Recherche sur L’intervention en éducation Physique et Sport (Hors-série N° 3). doi:10.4000/ejrieps.3570
   Google Scholar
• Roure, C., J. Méard, V. Lentillon-Kaestner, X. Flamme, Y. Devillers, and J. P. Dupont. 2019. “The Effects of Video Feedback on Students’ Situational Interest in Gymnastics.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 28 (5): 563–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiter, K., and P. Gerjets. 2007. “Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (3): 285–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. 2009. “Situational and Individual Interest.” In Handbook of Motivation at School, edited by A. Wigfield, 197–222. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., and R. Riempp. 2004. “The Cognitive Benefits of Interactive Videos: Learning to tie Nautical Knots.” Learning and Instruction 14 (3): 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, S., A. M. Woods, and P. R. Subramaniam. 1998. “Task Structures, Feedback to Individual Students, and Student Skill Level in Physical Education.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 69 (4): 420–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport. 2014. “Royal Decree 126/2014, Laying Down the Curriculum for Primary Education.” Goverment Gazette 52: 19406–19409.
   Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., K. A. Vertes, B. Law, and A. M. Rymal. 2013. “Learner-controlled Self-Observation is Advantageous for Motor Skill Acquisition.” Frontiers in Psychology 3: 556–561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stillar, B. 2012. “Twenty First Century Learning: how College Classroom Interaction Will Change in the Decades Ahead.” The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society 8 (1): 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H. 2012. “Exergaming Impact on Physical Activity and Interest in Elementary School Children.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 83 (2): 212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. 2013. “Impact of Exergames on Physical Activity and Motivation in Elementary School Students: A Follow-up Study.” Journal of Sport and Health Science 2 (3): 138–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga. 2011. “The Redundancy Effect.” In Cognitive Load Theory, edited by J. M. Spector and S. P. Lajoie, 141–154. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_11
   Google Scholar
• Tabbers, H. K., and B. de Koeijer. 2010. “Learner Control in Animated Multimedia Instructions.” Instructional Science 38 (5): 441–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gog, T., F. Paas, N. Marcus, P. Ayres, and J. Sweller. 2009. “The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations.” Educational Psychology Review 21 (1): 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viciana, J., D. Mayorga-Vega, S. Guijarro-Romero, and A. Martínez-Baena. 2017. “Effect of Two Alternated Teaching Units of Invasion Team Sports on the Tactical Learning in Primary Schoolchildren.” International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport 17 (3): 256–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, T., and S. Connor. 2009. “The Use of Digital Video in Physical Education.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 18 (2): 155–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A., N. Marcus, P. Ayres, L. Smith, G. A. Cooper, F. Paas, and J. Sweller. 2009. “Instructional Animations Can be Superior to Statics When Learning Human Motor Skills.” Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2): 339–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., H. K. Tabbers, and F. Paas. 2007. “Interactivity in Video-Based Models.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (3): 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., A. Clauss, C. H. Shea, and C. A. Whitacre. 2001. “Benefits of Self-Control in Dyad Practice.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 72 (3): 299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., and R. Lewthwaite. 2016. “Optimizing Performance Through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning: The OPTIMAL Theory of Motor Learning.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23 (5): 1382–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., and J. Su. 2007. “An External Focus of Attention Enhances Golf Shot Accuracy in Beginners and Experts.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 78 (4): 384–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar