Engaged observationalism: forming publics in the gallery film

References

• Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Angharad, C.S. 2016. “The Affective Atmospheres of Nationalism.”Cultural Geographies 23 (2): 181–98. doi:10.1177/1474474015569994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonisch, M., and M. Skey. 2017. “Affective Nationalism: Issues of Power, Agency and Method.”Progress in Human Geography 41 (6): 843–45. doi:10.1177/0309132516665279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balibar, E., and I. Wallerstein. 1991. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities. In Translated by Chris Turner, London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bálint Kovács, A. 2007. Screening Modernism: European Art Cinema, 1950–1980. Chicago. IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balsom, E. 2017. “The Reality-Based Community.”E-Flux Journal 83.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, K. 2005. “It’s Not Only Rock and Roll: ‘Rockumentary’, Direct Cinema, and Performative Display.”Australasian Journal of American Studies 24 (2): 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1968. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In Illuminations, ed. H. Zohn, New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. 2006. “The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents.”Artforum 178–83.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, J.D., and R. Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les Presses du reel.
   Google Scholar
• Bruzzi, S. 2000. New Documentary: A Critical Introduction. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge. MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canetti, E. 1962. Crowds and Power. Translated by Carol Stewart New York, NY: Victor Gollancz Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P., and S. Lütticken 2011. “Idiot Wind: An Introduction.” E-flux Journal, 22: 1–5. Accessed 13th October 2017. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/22/67701/idiot-wind-anintroduction/
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, E. 2009. “On Documentary Sounds and Images in the Gallery.”Screen 50 (1): 124–34. doi:10.1093/screen/hjn076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2016. Crowds and Party. London and Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1992. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.”October 59: 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. 1986. Black Skin, White Mask. Translated by Charles Lam Markmann London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Body/power. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon, 55–62. New York, NY: Pantheon Books
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. 2004. “Room for Experiment: Gallery Films and Vertical Time from Maya Deren to Eija Liisa Ahtila.”Screen 45 (4): 324–43. doi:10.1093/screen/45.4.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. 1987. There Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, A., and A. Ravetz. 2009. “Rethinking Observational Cinema.”The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (3): 538–56. doi:10.1111/jrai.2009.15.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, O., and Z. Hansen. 1961. The Open Form in Architecture – The Art of the Great Number. In CIAM ‘59 in Otterlo, ed. O. Newman, Stuttgart: Karl Krämer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. 2018a. Introduction: On the Visual Cultures of the New Nationalisms. In Nationalism in Contemporary Western European Cinema, ed. J. Harvey, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. 2018b. Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, H.A. 2016. Violent Subjects and Rhetorical Cartography in the Age of the Terror Wars. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kasuya, A. 2017. “An Open Design Theory for Society: From Oskar Hansen’s “Open Form” to Grzegorz Kowalski’s ‘Common Space, Private Space’.”The ACDHT Journal 2 (2017): 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G.H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. “On actor-network theory: A few clarifications.”Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bon, G. 1901. The Crowd: A study of the popular mind. Dunwoody, Georgia: Norman S. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, T.W. 2002. Museum Politics: Power Plays at the Exhibition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, L.U. 2002. Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Militz, E., and C. Schurr. 2016. “Affective Nationalism: Banalities of Belonging in Azerbaijan.”Political Geography 46: 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K. 2011. “Documentary-for-the-Other: Relationships, Ethics and (Observational) Documentary.”Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (3): 224–39. doi:10.1080/08900523.2011.581971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, S. 1979. “Triumph of the Will: Notes on Documentary and Spectacle.”Screen 1 (20): 63–86. doi:10.1093/screen/20.1.63
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, B. 1991. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics. New York, NY and London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2014. The Intervals of Cinema. Translated by John Howe, London and Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Sienkiewicz, K. 2011. Obszar Wspólny, Obszar Własny/Common Space, Individual Space. Warsaw: Instytut Teatralny.
   Google Scholar